Because a long focal length is used, exaggerating the movement of distant objects. Do we need a geometry lesson here? (By the way I would estimate around 5-15 seconds of exposure depending on the focal length, maybe even more).OK so why did stars move that far in 2.012 seconds.
Because it's very dark, but the lightening is acting as a flash to freeze motion in the scene.Why to is the flum not blurring from 2.012 exposer.
I don't see any stars or debris in the upper right, just ash.upper right side by small bolt your left why are those stars streaking vertical.
Still the stars streak yet the flum doesn't perfet pic of flum no blurring that flum is not rising up yet the stars are moving . Ithought stars were stationary and flum was in motion
Because it's very dark, but the lightening is acting as a flash to freeze motion in the scene.
I have to weild on this as I haven't done alot pics with long exposer . So the lighting freezes the motion on everthing in pic but the stars . Ok I will buy that. Only because I haven't taken pics like that but still seems odd to me . Than there is the streaking star that has heavey flum in background. Explain that one.
"A bit too close to be honest. I drove about 1 hour passed the police block. I wanted to get as close as possible without getting a heart attack. Goal was a 17-20mm wide angle sunset shot of a mirror in the river which turned out great. But then it just went absolutely crazy. I was not sure if I should escape or continue shooting, but I realized I was probably far too close to get away anyway. However the 2-3km lava that shot up landed on the back side of the volcano. I believe I must have been about 4-7km away from the eruption site.
This is taken with 70-200/2.8IS at about 70mm."
Because it's very dark, but the lightening is acting as a flash to freeze motion in the scene.
I have to weild on this as I haven't done alot pics with long exposer . So the lighting freezes the motion on everthing in pic but the stars . Ok I will buy that. Only because I haven't taken pics like that but still seems odd to me . Than there is the streaking star that has heavey flum in background. Explain that one.
I vote for photoshop. Can't be the lighting freezing the action on a single exposure because of the additional lighting in the fire/lava on the right. That part would be all blurred. I am think two separate exposures one of for the right and one of the lighting and what it lit up.
What the hell is flum?
Yeah, but it isn't the same as bedding a real woman.Whoa!
You know you can embed pics right?
Flum =Flume you couldn't reason that out . spelling nazi I suppose your stuck on logs. But flume can and is used in this manner also .
I raise 1 gay= happy to 1 gay = homosexual.
Interestingly it looks like this picture has a very long exposure but the lightening acted as a flash to freeze that one moment. Look at the sky - there are star streaks. Looks like a fairly long focal length, maybe 400mm, without bothering to do the maths on the star streaks I'd guess that was a ~5-15 second exposure. Neato.
Awesome. So does the volcano actually cause the lightning storm, or is it just coincidence? I would imagine that much ash going in the air would make weird things like that happen.
Wonder how this looks like from space.
As for the stars, I was wondering too why they moved so much without the rest of the pic blurring if it was in fact at a long exposure. That's one thing I miss from my old camera, my current one does not have the option to set exposure. You can take really cool pics in the dark with that setting.
5-15 seconds? No way. Those star streaks are very long, I would say minutes. I have never seen star streaks that long with even a 15 second exposure.
I wonder if the pic is a composite of several exposures or something. The star streaks don't really jive with the composition of the rest of the photo.
Ya I have same problem with cameria But friend is goingt o take pick of stars for me with long exposure so we can see the result. He to says that those streaks won't appear but like me he has never tried that on stars,
Flum =Flume you couldn't reason that out . spelling nazi I suppose your stuck on logs. But flume can and is used in this manner also .
I raise 1 gay= happy to 1 gay = homosexual.