darthsidious
Senior member
- Jul 13, 2005
- 481
- 0
- 71
Originally posted by: athithi
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Wow you really are grasping at straws now. So a no-name Indian propaganda site has more credibility than the US Dept of State? :roll:
So basically you latch on to one point, state it, plug your ears with your fingers and go nah-nah-nah-nah-nah?
Sorry to interrupt, but why a thread hijack? India does have it's own issues, there is no denying that, including kashmir and the north east. There almost certainly have been human rights violations, and india still has a long way to go to get rid of those. Yet, you miss one very crucial point. In the near 60 years since independence, India has remained democratic straight through, without a military coup, or even coming close to state where it looked like the govt would be overthrown by seperatist movements. That's more than can be said of most newly independent nations. India has a responsible civilan govt, and a consistent, no first use nuclear policy. Therefore I don't see the objection in supplying fuel for nuclear reactors; it's not like the US is teaching india how to build nuclear weapons
PS: for purposes of full disclousure, and if anyone cares, I'm of indian descent