No, that is not the same comparison. But, yes-conversing with passengers int eh car is very distracting. Don't tell me that you haven't missed exits or forgotten where you are going because you were engaged in conversation with your passenger(s). I know that I have, multiple times. That is absolutely distracting, but I digress...
The data clearly shows that some object in your hand, when controlled for other objects, is no more an indicator of any other object, individually. We haven't banned french fries or the freaking gear shift, have we?
No, we haven't. It is a pointless designation because is it lost in data.
conversing with a passenger is not the same as conversing with someone on the phone.
Why? Let's get down to the history of communication and human evolution. Won't this be fun!
Do you honestly believe that conversation between 2 people is purely an issue of voice? Do you think meaning is derived explicitly from aural signals? If you do, then I imagine the entire country of Italy would love to have a
conversation with you.
Why is photography important? Why was film silent, and yet entirely effective at conveying meaning for the first 4 decades of its existence? Why do we even give a shit about portraiture or any type of art that is not directly speaking to us? Do we just blindly stare at it, assuming it says nothing? How do we speak with humans that speak another language? I've traveled quite a bit in my life, and I manage quite well, even when I don't know they language. How can this be?
What about animal models? You know...our cousins. How do they communicate with such a limited spoken vocabulary? More interestingly, how do we manage to communicate with various animal species so effectively?
...and on and on.
Point is, speaking is merely a rather small percent of human conversation. it is a well-documented fact that phone conversation requires far, far, far more attention of the individual, than does a comparative conversation in person. Our brain has to fill in these gaps of the vast chasm of missing information that we have
long evolved to interpret as legitimate information.
Bullshit! you say. sorry, it's the truth. Distracted driving is, first and foremost, an issue of our caveman brain working behind the curtain to fill in the gaps of information that you are denying it. Unwittingly, sure; but denying that this effect isn't real is a hubristic (I invented a word!) behavior that does nothing but cost real lives, the more we choose to accept this status quo.
Here's ~ 30 studies, with the data, that explain this.
http://www.nsc.org/learn/NSC-Initiatives/Pages/distracted-driving-research-studies.aspx
Too bad Rudeguy isn't here to repeatedly demand that I show him the data, again and again, after refusing to look at the data that I showed him, again and again. :\
But I suspect the rest of you are smarter than Rudeguy. Sup, Rudeguy!