Why are you are trying to FUD the issues.
1. Van and Intel. Sure there is a history. Doesn't affect the "real" discussion as to whether the benchmark is good and whether it is intetionally biased. I doubt Anand is biased when he says he's able to reproduce these findings.
2. SSE2 in Tbred? "IF" intel/bapco is constantly changing the benchmarks, AMD will never be able to make a processor that will score well on the benches. What about SSE3 ...
3. Whatever. So does Intel and any company that wants to sell something.
4. While this is true, that has nothing to do with the current issue. You are suggesting that sysmark 2002 favors the PIV because the new versions of the programs contain more SSE2 due to Intels efforts (which is true of certain benchmarks that used to favor the athlon). However, from what AMD said, and verified by others, this is unlikely to be the case. This suggests that either (1) you did not read the analysis by AMD as well as what other have said about their analysis of the actual benchmark, or (2) you decided that the analysis was wrong (? reason) and substituted your own. If it is #1, then your commentary is useless conjecture in light of what I perceive to be real data. If it is #2, maybe you should share the data and not just your take on things