Do you still have that 2600K? If I remember correctly it did 5.1GHz without problems, so sandy at 5.1GHz would be just a tad bit slower than IVY at 4.9GHz, certainly not enough for most people to notice. If power consumption was of no importance, and no physical alterations involved, which one would you recommend sandy or ivy? I'm thinking about getting an 8 threaded CPU in my rig, as was the plan from the begging, only I expected IVY to be an improvement on all fronts like Kentsfield to Yorkfield, that's why I cheapened out and bought 2500k instead of 2600k.
I do. The 2600k would do 5GHz without missing beat. For what I do, I need 3-4 desktop computers so the 2600k was already rotated out of my "fun hobby computer" and over into a "it works for a living" computer, but I can certainly rotate it back if need be.
As for your question - SB or IB - once power usage is removed from the equation, if the individual is not using the iGPU then I'd recommend a SB no question. It is a no-fuss no-muss situation where hitting good overclocks on economical air cooling is completely doable.
IB was fun for me because of all the fuss and all the muss, being able to delid opened the door to doing fun stuff as a hobbyist but the fact that you basically have no choice but to go through all that just to get the same upper-end OC's that you can get out of SB makes it a difficult choice to recommend
under the constraints you gave.
Thanks for taking the time to do this, IDC. I have Arctic Silver 5 applied, and have used it for a while. I might pick up some NT-H1, for just a few bucks I may be able to drop 4-5C, if your results carry over to my PhII/Scythe Ninja copper. If nothing else, it'd be interesting to see the difference between well settled AS5 and the NT-H1. Again, thanks for posting all this great info.
I use to use AS5 religiously on all my rigs, I've have since completely switched over to NT-H1. I saw the same sort of improvement in temperatures on my Q6600, Q9505, 2600k and 3770k. I will test both AS5 and NT-H1 on my incoming FX8350, but it would be a damn odd thing if it suddenly didn't show the same kind of improvement
So would NT-H1 be fine with a non-modified SB or IB Core i5 for longterm use??
Absolutely fine. Noctua knows what they are doing and it shows whether you are looking at their NH-D14 coolers or their NT-H1 TIM. I even used NT-H1 on my GTX460 when
I delidded it and remounted an Accelero
XTREME Plus.
(I sound like a damned spokesperson for Noctua D: but I swears I'm just calling it like I sees it)
hey IDC, you pointed out that your AS5 seemed a bit watered down. i'm not bringing this back up to reiterate what others have already mentioned (that AS5 shouldn't be that runny), but rather to get your take on a similar scenario i had w/ Noctua NT-H1. my tube of NT-H1 seemed extremely thick and was a nightmare to spread evenly over my IHS (no de-lidded CPU here). i was wondering if my NT-H1 has possibly "gone bad" like the watered down portion of your AS5 tube, or if that's just the way NT-H1 is. and if so, should i be doing the "rice grain-sized drop" method on the IHS instead of trying to spread it first?
TIA,
Eric
Hi Eric,
Yeah the AS5 seemed odd to me but the performance wasn't any different than what I'm use to.
That said, I've been through 4 tubes of NT-H1 now and they were all very smooth and easy to apply. So it does sound like you either got a bad batch of NT-H1 or it had separated somehow inside the tube...either way you would be better off IMO tossing the tube and getting another one. $10 shipped is a pretty good price for
any TIM IMO, not worth the hassle of wondering if your results are questionable because you think the tube might be questionable.
(FWIW I pitched my AS5 tube too, got two others I will use for future tests)
All the best,
Phil
You or someone else had mentioned that one (or the other) CoolLaboratory products remained in a liquid state -- good in one sense because you may be able to remove the processor from the water-block without damaging it, not so good even for a "reversible" pumping out. So -- yeah -- it probably makes more sense to reinstall the IHS with something like the Indigo: You get lower temperatures than with other solutions that include IHS replacement, but you can compromise those gains with the IHS and still be able to remove the water block or HSF.
So all the readers here have several options worth considering.
Having seen the way the Liquid Ultra sort of bonds and solidifies to my H100 (removable only by lapping, no different than the Indigo Xtreme in that sense) I actually suspect it will perform just fine against pump-out over time. We'll certainly know if it doesn't because it really is a favorite amongst delidders, so we'll be hearing reports of it in about 2-3 months time if that turns out to be the case.
Need me to make a road trip? I kept talking myself out of getting a 3930k when they were at $399 and i'm still telling myself I don't need a 3820 also.
Right now I've got my fingers crossed on snagging a 3770k for $110, so lets see if that pans out.
DOH! Sorry IDC, I just read through the thread, sorry to hear about your CPU.
Thanks for the condolences, I must say the part that sucks is sitting here thinking of all the additional tests that would have been fun to run but I can't because the chip is no longer available.
Would have been nice to make an attempt at that Goldilocks liquid ultra run, or test out the liquid pro, or re-test AS5 with a different tube, or do more tests with MX-4 to figure out how on earth it crapped out on me so badly
I was even wanting to run some tests with the Intel Stock HSF on the bare die to see if the necessity of the IHS as a heat-spreader for the low-cost stock HSF was fact or fiction. Alas, can't do that now.