Yeah, just look at all their accomplishments when they controlled the Whits House and both houses of congress with a super majority in the senate. All they managed to do was pass a republican health plan.
They can't find enough money for programs that benefit working americans , but they have no problem not only spending over 700 billion on the military, but they find an extra 20-30 billion to give them.
I see you're delusional. That senate supermajority lasted a whopping ~80 days, and had a number of conservative Democrats in the Senate. However, the House under Pelosi's leadership did pass a bill with a public option (it was unfortunately stymied in the Senate by a death and some conservative Democrats opposing it); regardless, many pieces of legislation were signed into law including some banking reforms and the greatest expansion of the social safety net in my lifetime. If you don't think giving millions of people access to health insurance via Medicaid expansion and millions more subsidized private coverage (while also bolstering what that private coverage is required to provide - no lifetime caps, preventative care coverage, etc), then I have some beach front property in Wyoming that you just might be interested in.
To call the ACA a republican healthcare plan is pretty dishonest. Maybe it was roughly aligned with something Heritage came up with in the 90s to make it look like they were Serious People when opposing HillaryCare, and something the conservative state of Massachusetts enacted, but in the late 2000s, the Republican healthcare plan was, as Alan Grayson so elegantly out: Don't get sick, but if you get sick, die quickly.
Edit:
Everyone loves to cry about military spending, but just try cutting it: it's a giant jobs program. Can't kill outdated and not needed aircraft from the Cold War; we need two armies for some reason (looking at you Marine Corp), each with their own toys; we can't decide on what we want our military to do, so they need to do everything ($$$$)...