Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
Originally posted by: her209
I caught part of the Florida-Arkansas game and the refs gave the game to the Gators. That pass interference call followed by the unnecessary roughness call allowed Florida to score their tying TD.Originally posted by: Adrenaline
Florida had 4 turnovers, some were really bad. They won the game though with 4 turnovers to 0. Arkansas may not be ranked, but they are a good team. Didn't they beat undefeated Auburn the week before? Arkansas can run the score up in a hurry on any team. Florida dropped in the polls because of the way they played, but they still won the game.
The PI call was legit, sorry, but the UR was a joke. You can't touch a person before the ball gets there right in front of a ref and expect him to just let it slide.
Yeah you can. It was an underthrown ball and the DB turned to make a play on it. There was nothing wrong. If that BS was supposed to be called like that, every QB would intentionally underthrow the ball and let the WR get a pass interference call on every down. It was a weak sauce pussy ass call. Not nearly as bad as the personal foul on the next play though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN3Xq9BXu8c
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: SirStev0
Originally posted by: CPA
Oh please, I'm not a Cinci fan but Tony Pike would surgically dismantle Iowa's secondary. Iowa doesn't have Cinci's speed. Of course, Big Ten homers would say differently.
This isn't basketball. There is no team in the Big East that could beat any team in the top half of the Big Ten in football.
Typical Big Ten fantacism. Your conference is once again overrated but you are blind to it. I guarantee Cinci, WVU (with a health Jarrett Brown) and even SFU could be OSU, Michigan or Iowa on a consistent basis. Take off the blinders and stop listening to ESPN. Watch some actual games outside of your conference once in a while.
Originally posted by: Fmr12B
Originally posted by: SirStev0
I love how Cincinnati and Boise State are both above Iowa. So ridiculous. Does anyone really think head to head either of these teams would have a chance against any of the Top teams in other divisions. Seriously who have they beaten? Nobodies. VTech which is so overranked it wasn't funny.
Boise Sate beat the #13 ranked team in the nation - U of Oregon.
I would not consider them to be nobodies.
Also Boise State has a history of winning their bowl games against top rated teams.
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
2002 - 2 losses. WSU was ok then but KSU was ALWAYS overrated and played nobody EVER
WSU played the Rose Bowl game on 1/1 and lost to Oklahoma
KSU played the Holiday Bowl game on 12/27 and beat Arizona State
2003 - a 6 loss team
2004 - YAY
2005 - I have no idea how they lost to run all over the place while bing a horrible passer Young. I was rooting for them to win. I can't stand Texas.
2006 - a 4 loss team and 5 loss team
2007 - LOL
2008 - a 4 loss team that was actually decent, didn't they run the ball all over USC? (Florida lost to Ole Miss a 4 loss team by a blocked extra point for a 1 point defeat and Oklahoma lost to Texas, don't recall the score)
2009 - Washington? Really?
They lose to HORRIBLE teams. A 4 loss team in college is not that great, sorry. Have a quality loss and it can be acceptable, but some of the teams listed should NOT have beaten USC. Only one or two teams have played in the NCG with a 2 loss record. But yeah, grats on the NC in 2004 and what should have been in 2005 but USC loses games they should win when they should not. I just get tired of hearing about them year in and year out when they lose to a bad team and then complain about playing in the Rose Bowl when other teams handle their business.
If USC had handled Washington like they should have, then we would not even be talking about this right now. USC for some reason has a total oddball loss in their conference to some team not even close to their level.
Maybe I should not have said "every year" but it has come pretty close. It is sad to see. Washington is not any good this year and neither is Notre Dame, sorry.
Saying Washington is better this year is like saying the Detroit Lions are better this year. It is bound to happen but they are still horrible.
LOL @ calling WSU and Kansas St from the late 90's-03 Ok. What the fuck exactly is your idea of a good football team? is there only one good football team every year?
Lol @ criticizing them for losing to a 6 loss team. Three of their losses that year were to top 25 teams, and none of their losses came from an opponent under .500
Lol @ replying "yay" to one of the greatest football teams in NCAA history going undefeated and smoking an undefeated Oklahoma team featuring a returning Heisman winner and Adrian Peterson.
Again lol @ 4 and losses. The 4 loss team beat Chase Daniel and Tony Temple in the Sun Bowl and the 5 loss team lost to Florida St in a bowl game.
Lol @ "a 4 loss team that was actually decent" And yeah I guess you can say they "ran all over USC". They had an All American RB and a very good offensive line. That team also went to pitch a shutout against a top 20 team that hadn't been shut out in a decade. They lost by a TD on the road. Yeah Florida lost on a blocked kick, but they lost on a blocked kick, at home, to a team with a 12 game conference losing streak. I think Oklahoma lost to Texas by 10, and they gave up over 40 points. I don't know why you brought all that up though.
Lol @ "Washington really?". Yes Washington. They lost on a last second field goal. Washington played LSU to eight fucking points, and took ND (and yes they are a good team) to overtime. What don't you get about Washington being a good team? Jake Locker is one of the top 5 QBs in the country.
Yes, KSU was horrible, sorry, they NEVER played anyone that was really good, decent maybe, but nothing spectacular. When they played highly ranked opponents they lost. But at least they beat up on all the underachieving teams all the time. I don't follow WSU.
A 6 loss team is a 6 loss team, they suck.
Oklahoma's returning Heisman winner was Jason White? Don't make me laugh. A huge joke. I said YAY, congrats on a title.
2005 was a heartbreak I know.
2 losses, NEXT !
Stanford at home, nothing needs to be said.
Washington is HORRIBLE, PATHETIC, CRAPPY, anything else I can think of. They had to get better from last year, heck they would not get any worse. Notre Dame has beaten NOBODY of relevence.
Originally posted by: Fmr12B
Originally posted by: SirStev0
I love how Cincinnati and Boise State are both above Iowa. So ridiculous. Does anyone really think head to head either of these teams would have a chance against any of the Top teams in other divisions. Seriously who have they beaten? Nobodies. VTech which is so overranked it wasn't funny.
Boise Sate beat the #13 ranked team in the nation - U of Oregon.
I would not consider them to be nobodies.
Also Boise State has a history of winning their bowl games against top rated teams.
Originally posted by: DT4K
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
2002 - 2 losses. WSU was ok then but KSU was ALWAYS overrated and played nobody EVER
WSU played the Rose Bowl game on 1/1 and lost to Oklahoma
KSU played the Holiday Bowl game on 12/27 and beat Arizona State
2003 - a 6 loss team
2004 - YAY
2005 - I have no idea how they lost to run all over the place while bing a horrible passer Young. I was rooting for them to win. I can't stand Texas.
2006 - a 4 loss team and 5 loss team
2007 - LOL
2008 - a 4 loss team that was actually decent, didn't they run the ball all over USC? (Florida lost to Ole Miss a 4 loss team by a blocked extra point for a 1 point defeat and Oklahoma lost to Texas, don't recall the score)
2009 - Washington? Really?
They lose to HORRIBLE teams. A 4 loss team in college is not that great, sorry. Have a quality loss and it can be acceptable, but some of the teams listed should NOT have beaten USC. Only one or two teams have played in the NCG with a 2 loss record. But yeah, grats on the NC in 2004 and what should have been in 2005 but USC loses games they should win when they should not. I just get tired of hearing about them year in and year out when they lose to a bad team and then complain about playing in the Rose Bowl when other teams handle their business.
If USC had handled Washington like they should have, then we would not even be talking about this right now. USC for some reason has a total oddball loss in their conference to some team not even close to their level.
Maybe I should not have said "every year" but it has come pretty close. It is sad to see. Washington is not any good this year and neither is Notre Dame, sorry.
Saying Washington is better this year is like saying the Detroit Lions are better this year. It is bound to happen but they are still horrible.
LOL @ calling WSU and Kansas St from the late 90's-03 Ok. What the fuck exactly is your idea of a good football team? is there only one good football team every year?
Lol @ criticizing them for losing to a 6 loss team. Three of their losses that year were to top 25 teams, and none of their losses came from an opponent under .500
Lol @ replying "yay" to one of the greatest football teams in NCAA history going undefeated and smoking an undefeated Oklahoma team featuring a returning Heisman winner and Adrian Peterson.
Again lol @ 4 and losses. The 4 loss team beat Chase Daniel and Tony Temple in the Sun Bowl and the 5 loss team lost to Florida St in a bowl game.
Lol @ "a 4 loss team that was actually decent" And yeah I guess you can say they "ran all over USC". They had an All American RB and a very good offensive line. That team also went to pitch a shutout against a top 20 team that hadn't been shut out in a decade. They lost by a TD on the road. Yeah Florida lost on a blocked kick, but they lost on a blocked kick, at home, to a team with a 12 game conference losing streak. I think Oklahoma lost to Texas by 10, and they gave up over 40 points. I don't know why you brought all that up though.
Lol @ "Washington really?". Yes Washington. They lost on a last second field goal. Washington played LSU to eight fucking points, and took ND (and yes they are a good team) to overtime. What don't you get about Washington being a good team? Jake Locker is one of the top 5 QBs in the country.
Yes, KSU was horrible, sorry, they NEVER played anyone that was really good, decent maybe, but nothing spectacular. When they played highly ranked opponents they lost. But at least they beat up on all the underachieving teams all the time. I don't follow WSU.
A 6 loss team is a 6 loss team, they suck.
Oklahoma's returning Heisman winner was Jason White? Don't make me laugh. A huge joke. I said YAY, congrats on a title.
2005 was a heartbreak I know.
2 losses, NEXT !
Stanford at home, nothing needs to be said.
Washington is HORRIBLE, PATHETIC, CRAPPY, anything else I can think of. They had to get better from last year, heck they would not get any worse. Notre Dame has beaten NOBODY of relevence.
Dude, you are making me LMFAO. I love it.
Sorry, but you aren't going to convince anyone that an 11-2 team is HORRIBLE. Sure, you can argue that they didn't play any "spectactular" teams, and you can argue that they are overrated. But any 11-2 team in divison 1 football is at least a "good" team. By no stretch of the imagination can you consider them horrible.
An 8-6 teams sucks? Personally, my definition of something sucking is that it's really bad, as in a team that is worse than most other teams, you know, like a team with a losing record? An 8-6 team is better than average. Not great, but again, by no stretch of the imagination, could you consider them to be "horrible".
Yes, USC has lost 1 game they should have won almost every year. The reason they should have won is because they are one of the best teams in college football. But they haven't all been to horrible teams, unless your definition of a horrible team is everyone except the top 10, which seems like a pretty ridiculous definition.
By the way, I'm a duck fan, so I've got no love for USC at all. But anyone with a brain can admit that they have been one of the most dominant teams in college football in the past 7 or 8 years.
Originally posted by: vi edit
Go Hawkeyes! We're like the Rodney Dangerfield of the Big-10. We get no respect. We go 7-0 and take the top of the Big 10 and there's hardly even a one line blip on the major sports sites.
Oh well.
Now if we could just get Stanzi to do a warm up quarter and get the INT's out of his system before the game actually starts maybe we'd do even better. He's HORRIBLE that first quarter/half. But then just lights it up the next 2 or 3 quarters.
University of South Carolina? Southern Cal doesn't run a spread offense.Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Exactly. I bet even UCONN or Rutgers could beat Michigan (until they get coach Rod's guys in there) in the least. He's a total Big Ten homer and it's hilarious how many morons don't give the Big East any respect yet they consistently destroy other conferences in Bowls. Hell, Michigan even had to steal Rich Rodriguez from WVU, WVU practically invented the spread with Slaton/White and copycat schools like OSU and USC studied Rich Rod's system. WVU was the first dominant school to implement the spread but Rich was always one big win away from a national title.
Until the Big Ten can beat the Big East's record in bowls I say: STFU!!!
Originally posted by: her209
University of South Carolina? Southern Cal doesn't run a spread offense.Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Exactly. I bet even UCONN or Rutgers could beat Michigan (until they get coach Rod's guys in there) in the least. He's a total Big Ten homer and it's hilarious how many morons don't give the Big East any respect yet they consistently destroy other conferences in Bowls. Hell, Michigan even had to steal Rich Rodriguez from WVU, WVU practically invented the spread with Slaton/White and copycat schools like OSU and USC studied Rich Rod's system. WVU was the first dominant school to implement the spread but Rich was always one big win away from a national title.
Until the Big Ten can beat the Big East's record in bowls I say: STFU!!!
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: vi edit
Go Hawkeyes! We're like the Rodney Dangerfield of the Big-10. We get no respect. We go 7-0 and take the top of the Big 10 and there's hardly even a one line blip on the major sports sites.
Oh well.
Now if we could just get Stanzi to do a warm up quarter and get the INT's out of his system before the game actually starts maybe we'd do even better. He's HORRIBLE that first quarter/half. But then just lights it up the next 2 or 3 quarters.
even though I am a USC fan it would be funny it Iowa somehow gets going and eeks out a win in the NCG vs an SEC team.
Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Queasy
Georgia opened at Oklahoma St and also played Arizona State
Alabama opened with Va Tech on a neutral field
Tennessee played UCLA in their 2nd game
LSU opened at Washington
Arkansas played Texas A&M in Texas on a neutral field
Auburn played West Virginia
South Carolina opened at North Carolina State and plays Clemson later
Florida closes with Florida State
Kentucky played Louisville
Vanderbilt plays Georgia Tech
The only SEC schools without at least one BCS conference opponent are Ole Miss and Miss St. Try again.
Try what again? The SEC does in fact play the fewest number of BCS teams out of conference on average. He didn't say they don't play any, he said they play the fewest... which is 100% accurate.
In the past years, that has been accurate. But the SEC has picked up their out of conference schedules the last two years and are scheduling better ooc games in the future.
He also said that they open up against the weak sisters of the poor at home. Which is inaccurate this year if you look at the list. The only truly embarrassing OOC schedules for the SEC this year is Florida's opening schedule and the two Mississippi schools.
Ummmm.. and what do you call playing Missouri State, Louisiana Tech, Western Carolina, and Miami of Ohio? So that's seven schools with pathetic opening games, not only 3. You could count Washington coming off an 0-12 year for LSU, but they played LSU, Notre Dame, and USC very tough and appear to be very much improved, so they don't count. Otherwise it would be eight.
Originally posted by: vi edit
Go Hawkeyes! We're like the Rodney Dangerfield of the Big-10. We get no respect. We go 7-0 and take the top of the Big 10 and there's hardly even a one line blip on the major sports sites.
Oh well.
Now if we could just get Stanzi to do a warm up quarter and get the INT's out of his system before the game actually starts maybe we'd do even better. He's HORRIBLE that first quarter/half. But then just lights it up the next 2 or 3 quarters.
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Queasy
Georgia opened at Oklahoma St and also played Arizona State
Alabama opened with Va Tech on a neutral field
Tennessee played UCLA in their 2nd game
LSU opened at Washington
Arkansas played Texas A&M in Texas on a neutral field
Auburn played West Virginia
South Carolina opened at North Carolina State and plays Clemson later
Florida closes with Florida State
Kentucky played Louisville
Vanderbilt plays Georgia Tech
The only SEC schools without at least one BCS conference opponent are Ole Miss and Miss St. Try again.
Try what again? The SEC does in fact play the fewest number of BCS teams out of conference on average. He didn't say they don't play any, he said they play the fewest... which is 100% accurate.
In the past years, that has been accurate. But the SEC has picked up their out of conference schedules the last two years and are scheduling better ooc games in the future.
He also said that they open up against the weak sisters of the poor at home. Which is inaccurate this year if you look at the list. The only truly embarrassing OOC schedules for the SEC this year is Florida's opening schedule and the two Mississippi schools.
Ummmm.. and what do you call playing Missouri State, Louisiana Tech, Western Carolina, and Miami of Ohio? So that's seven schools with pathetic opening games, not only 3. You could count Washington coming off an 0-12 year for LSU, but they played LSU, Notre Dame, and USC very tough and appear to be very much improved, so they don't count. Otherwise it would be eight.
It's not just the first game but the first four games of the season. sciencewhiz said, "Have everyone start conference play 4-0." Also, the criteria was BCS teams. These schedules are made a couple to several years in advance so you never know when the team you'll be playing will be a quality opponent or at the bottom of the barrel. And you can't always get a quality BCS opponent as the first game of the season. Scheduling home and homes or even neutral site games between BCS teams takes alot of work juggling schedules. Alot moreso than scheduling non-BCS teams.
But let's look go ahead and take a look at next year's OOC schedule for BCS teams:
Alabama - 2nd game is against Penn St. 1st game in a home and home series.
LSU - Opens with North Carolina on a neutral site. 4th game at home vs West Virginia (home and home)
Florida - Ends the season at Florida State
Georgia - 5th game is at Colorado (home and home). Ends the season hosting Ga Tech.
Auburn - Hosts Clemson in the 3rd game (home and home).
Tennessee - Hosts Oregon in the 2nd game (home and home).
Arkansas - 4th game is Texas A&M on a neutral site in Texas
South Carolina - Closes at Clemson
Kentucky - Opens at Louisville
Ole Miss - No BCS opponents
Miss St - No BCS opponents
Vanderbilt - Opens with Northwestern. Closes with Wake Forest.
Originally posted by: SirStev0
Originally posted by: Queasy
But let's look go ahead and take a look at next year's OOC schedule for BCS teams:
Alabama - 2nd game is against Penn St. 1st game in a home and home series.
LSU - Opens with North Carolina on a neutral site. 4th game at home vs West Virginia (home and home)
Florida - Ends the season at Florida State
Georgia - 5th game is at Colorado (home and home). Ends the season hosting Ga Tech.
Auburn - Hosts Clemson in the 3rd game (home and home).
Tennessee - Hosts Oregon in the 2nd game (home and home).
Arkansas - 4th game is Texas A&M on a neutral site in Texas
South Carolina - Closes at Clemson
Kentucky - Opens at Louisville
Ole Miss - No BCS opponents
Miss St - No BCS opponents
Vanderbilt - Opens with Northwestern. Closes with Wake Forest.
Can I even begin to say how excited I am for that game? I have a bunch of buddies who are huge Bama fans and we have been talking about this forever. It is just a shame we can't put this years defense out there right now against Bama.
Originally posted by: DT4K
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
Originally posted by: JDawg1536
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
2002 - 2 losses. WSU was ok then but KSU was ALWAYS overrated and played nobody EVER
WSU played the Rose Bowl game on 1/1 and lost to Oklahoma
KSU played the Holiday Bowl game on 12/27 and beat Arizona State
2003 - a 6 loss team
2004 - YAY
2005 - I have no idea how they lost to run all over the place while bing a horrible passer Young. I was rooting for them to win. I can't stand Texas.
2006 - a 4 loss team and 5 loss team
2007 - LOL
2008 - a 4 loss team that was actually decent, didn't they run the ball all over USC? (Florida lost to Ole Miss a 4 loss team by a blocked extra point for a 1 point defeat and Oklahoma lost to Texas, don't recall the score)
2009 - Washington? Really?
They lose to HORRIBLE teams. A 4 loss team in college is not that great, sorry. Have a quality loss and it can be acceptable, but some of the teams listed should NOT have beaten USC. Only one or two teams have played in the NCG with a 2 loss record. But yeah, grats on the NC in 2004 and what should have been in 2005 but USC loses games they should win when they should not. I just get tired of hearing about them year in and year out when they lose to a bad team and then complain about playing in the Rose Bowl when other teams handle their business.
If USC had handled Washington like they should have, then we would not even be talking about this right now. USC for some reason has a total oddball loss in their conference to some team not even close to their level.
Maybe I should not have said "every year" but it has come pretty close. It is sad to see. Washington is not any good this year and neither is Notre Dame, sorry.
Saying Washington is better this year is like saying the Detroit Lions are better this year. It is bound to happen but they are still horrible.
LOL @ calling WSU and Kansas St from the late 90's-03 Ok. What the fuck exactly is your idea of a good football team? is there only one good football team every year?
Lol @ criticizing them for losing to a 6 loss team. Three of their losses that year were to top 25 teams, and none of their losses came from an opponent under .500
Lol @ replying "yay" to one of the greatest football teams in NCAA history going undefeated and smoking an undefeated Oklahoma team featuring a returning Heisman winner and Adrian Peterson.
Again lol @ 4 and losses. The 4 loss team beat Chase Daniel and Tony Temple in the Sun Bowl and the 5 loss team lost to Florida St in a bowl game.
Lol @ "a 4 loss team that was actually decent" And yeah I guess you can say they "ran all over USC". They had an All American RB and a very good offensive line. That team also went to pitch a shutout against a top 20 team that hadn't been shut out in a decade. They lost by a TD on the road. Yeah Florida lost on a blocked kick, but they lost on a blocked kick, at home, to a team with a 12 game conference losing streak. I think Oklahoma lost to Texas by 10, and they gave up over 40 points. I don't know why you brought all that up though.
Lol @ "Washington really?". Yes Washington. They lost on a last second field goal. Washington played LSU to eight fucking points, and took ND (and yes they are a good team) to overtime. What don't you get about Washington being a good team? Jake Locker is one of the top 5 QBs in the country.
Yes, KSU was horrible, sorry, they NEVER played anyone that was really good, decent maybe, but nothing spectacular. When they played highly ranked opponents they lost. But at least they beat up on all the underachieving teams all the time. I don't follow WSU.
A 6 loss team is a 6 loss team, they suck.
Oklahoma's returning Heisman winner was Jason White? Don't make me laugh. A huge joke. I said YAY, congrats on a title.
2005 was a heartbreak I know.
2 losses, NEXT !
Stanford at home, nothing needs to be said.
Washington is HORRIBLE, PATHETIC, CRAPPY, anything else I can think of. They had to get better from last year, heck they would not get any worse. Notre Dame has beaten NOBODY of relevence.
Dude, you are making me LMFAO. I love it.
Sorry, but you aren't going to convince anyone that an 11-2 team is HORRIBLE. Sure, you can argue that they didn't play any "spectactular" teams, and you can argue that they are overrated. But any 11-2 team in divison 1 football is at least a "good" team. By no stretch of the imagination can you consider them horrible.
An 8-6 teams sucks? Personally, my definition of something sucking is that it's really bad, as in a team that is worse than most other teams, you know, like a team with a losing record? An 8-6 team is better than average. Not great, but again, by no stretch of the imagination, could you consider them to be "horrible".
Yes, USC has lost 1 game they should have won almost every year. The reason they should have won is because they are one of the best teams in college football. But they haven't all been to horrible teams, unless your definition of a horrible team is everyone except the top 10, which seems like a pretty ridiculous definition.
By the way, I'm a duck fan, so I've got no love for USC at all. But anyone with a brain can admit that they have been one of the most dominant teams in college football in the past 7 or 8 years.
Originally posted by: thepd7
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
2002 - 2 losses. WSU was ok then but KSU was ALWAYS overrated and played nobody EVER
WSU played the Rose Bowl game on 1/1 and lost to Oklahoma
KSU played the Holiday Bowl game on 12/27 and beat Arizona State
2003 - a 6 loss team
2004 - YAY
2005 - I have no idea how they lost to run all over the place while bing a horrible passer Young. I was rooting for them to win. I can't stand Texas.
2006 - a 4 loss team and 5 loss team
2007 - LOL
2008 - a 4 loss team that was actually decent, didn't they run the ball all over USC? (Florida lost to Ole Miss a 4 loss team by a blocked extra point for a 1 point defeat and Oklahoma lost to Texas, don't recall the score)
2009 - Washington? Really?
They lose to HORRIBLE teams. A 4 loss team in college is not that great, sorry. Have a quality loss and it can be acceptable, but some of the teams listed should NOT have beaten USC. Only one or two teams have played in the NCG with a 2 loss record. But yeah, grats on the NC in 2004 and what should have been in 2005 but USC loses games they should win when they should not. I just get tired of hearing about them year in and year out when they lose to a bad team and then complain about playing in the Rose Bowl when other teams handle their business.
If USC had handled Washington like they should have, then we would not even be talking about this right now. USC for some reason has a total oddball loss in their conference to some team not even close to their level.
Maybe I should not have said "every year" but it has come pretty close. It is sad to see. Washington is not any good this year and neither is Notre Dame, sorry.
Saying Washington is better this year is like saying the Detroit Lions are better this year. It is bound to happen but they are still horrible.
Who has been better since 2002 from a consistency standpoint?
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Just goes to show that most voters are high on crack when voting.
Originally posted by: Adrenaline
I am glad I can provide you with some entertainment. Until we have a playoff in college football, rarely will the true nation champion be 100% correct. The BCS comes close but will not be 100%. KSU was unfortunately a team that could beat everyone they were supposed to but when it came to playing good teams, I would be surprised if they won 3 out of 20 games. They were overrated and overhyped and thus just were not a good football team despite their over bloated record every year. An 8-6 team is not great by any means no matter how you look at it.
I retracted when I saidi all HORRIBLE teams, it was in a post, but the fact remains most have been HORRIBLE nonetheless. I also said USC should have won at least 3 national titles in this decade but they have not. I would have loved to see USC play Florida last year instead of the overhyped OK team that ran the score up on EVERY team they played.
Talking football is fun !!!