AVX/2 causes the difference.
the E5420 doesn't support AVX and it got the same as the AVX CPUs, it's something else.
AVX/2 causes the difference.
with a "Core 2 Duo" Pentium(T4400):
encoded 1497 frames in 2798.17s (0.53 fps), 3978.85 kb/s, Avg QP:26.14
if you can disable 2 cores of a quad core to test if it changes the bitrate it could be interesting
AVX/2 causes the difference.
Xeon E5-2699v4@2.2GHz, DDR4-2400 (Broadwell server, 22 core, 55MB L2)
encoded 1497 frames in 85.59s (17.49 fps), 4058.76 kb/s, Avg QP:26.32
Surprisingly close to The Stilt's number considering the 4 extra cores, slightly faster memory and the 10MB more cache.
Edit: clean reboot knocked 1s off of my score... no idea why except that Windows likes it's reboots. Updated score.
Blame Intel for confusingthe consumerseven the enthusiasts.
Win 10 // i7-4770k@4.2Ghz DDR3-1600
encoded 1497 frames in 204.90s (7.31 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
PD: Dud OC chip, I have a heat wall with 1.25v but haven´t had the time and need to delid it. Also, I've always regretted not buying faster ram (ddr3 2133) when I built this. I would love to see how much differece It makes in haswell.
Still, 25% slower than a 10% higher clocked Skylake with much faster ram. It really shows how little there's to gain by upgrading right now.
My 4770k would barely do 4.0 before I delidded it. Afterward I was able to get 4.3 stable.
Do I get to do two entries? if so,
4770k 4.3 core/4.1 cache DDR3 2400 10-12-12-32 Windows 10
encoded 1497 frames in 193.74s (7.73 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
193.74 vs my 5960x at 4.5 GHz at 98.12 shows some bad scaling from 4c/8t to 8c/16t
OK . . . HEre it is -- my 6700K Skylake sig system: i7-6700K @ 4.7 Ghz; DDR4-3200 14-14-14 @ XMP spec; Z170 in Sabertooth Z170 S. Currently booted to the Win7-64 OS. Hyperthreading enabled.
I'd never tried running this before, although I thought it was a component of ROG RealBench, which I've used in stress-testing. My CPU temperatures went up to about 60C +/- all cores.
Here's the output line:
encoded 1497 frames in 168.77s (8.87 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Hmm . . . falls short of bbhaag's i7-6700K @ 4.6. What does that mean? I've got a single GTX 1070 OC'd to ~2,038 core and 8,904 Mhz memory.
i7-3770 @ 4.0GHz (100x40) 16GB DDR3 8-8-8-24-2T Windows 7.
encoded 1497 frames in 281.67s (5.31 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
I gather some scores and try to make chart.
i7-3770 @ 4.0GHz (100x40) 16GB DDR3 8-8-8-24-2T Windows 7.
encoded 1497 frames in 281.67s (5.31 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
I gather some scores and try to make chart.