Benchmark your computer with Handbrake 1.01 and x265

[Teizo]

Is that 3.6ghz on all cores Crono? ThoseRyzen chips are hella quick for productivity tasks.

 

[Kenmitch]

encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10

Nice score! Ryzen is a handbrake monster!

 

[Jan Olšan]

Pretty nice considering it's x265 which uses AVX2 for big boosts on Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake.

 

[ElFenix]

encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10

thanks!

 

[Hail The Brain Slug]

encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10

That's quite interesting, assuming a linear scaling with frequency it should take your 1700x about 106 seconds at 4.5 GHz, and my 5960x takes about 98 seconds at 4.5.

Although frequency scaling may not be linear, so when I get home I'm going to try and clock my 5960x at 3.6 and see how it compares.

 

[Crono]

Is that 3.6ghz on all cores Crono? ThoseRyzen chips are hella quick for productivity tasks.

Yes, all cores.

 

[nevbie]

encoded 1497 frames in 1246.10s (1.20 fps), 3978.83 kb/s, Avg QP:26.14

CPU: Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 9x333=3.0 GHz
RAM: 2x2GB DDR2-800
OS: Win7 64-bit

No extra programs running, stock performance settings.

 

[nk215]

encoded 1497 frames in 144.75s (10.34 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Running on my Win7x64 virtual machine, with 6gb memory allocated, 32 cores

On a dual E5-2670v1 with PC3-10600R DDR3-Server-Memory-ECC-1333MHz; ESXi 5.5

CPU was around 60% utilized all the way. Sever has 7 more VMs running but mostly idle at the moment.

 

[thepaleobiker]

quoting that one line should be sufficient for what we're doing here. there may be a couple other lines that could bear inspection, i'll read through the old thread and see in the morning.

and even if at some point in the future posting the log file is necessary, just don't delete them?

encoded 1497 frames in 544.13s (2.75 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

CPU : Pentium G4560 Kaby Lake (2C/4T at 3.5 GHz) Stock
Memory : 2 x 8 GB DDR4 2400 (dual channel, CL16)
OS : Win 10 Pro Insider 64-Bit
Usual background services + Chrome running + Kaspersky IS (wasnt scanning)

Regards,
Vishnu

 

[thepaleobiker]

My same G4600 @ stock 3.6Ghz with HT, no AVX/AVX2, dual-channel DDR4-2400 @ 2400

encoded 1497 frames in 528.50s (2.83 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

I dont think this above entry has been updated in the main table for your G4600 by OP/Moderator (@ElFenix ). I have a G4560 and completed it in 544 seconds, and in the main post, it says your (@VirtualLarry ) G4600 took 580s with the G4600.... I was surprised because I was expecting mine to come in slightly lower than a G4600..... It looks like the main post is perhaps incorrect.

So G4600 --> 528 seconds
& G4560 --> 544 seconds

Makes sense! I love repeatable, logical results

Regards,
Vishnu

 

[ElFenix]

I dont think this above entry has been updated in the main table for your G4600 by OP/Moderator (@ElFenix ). I have a G4560 and completed it in 544 seconds, and in the main post, it says your (@VirtualLarry ) G4600 took 580s with the G4600.... I was surprised because I was expecting mine to come in slightly lower than a G4600..... It looks like the main post is perhaps incorrect.

So G4600 --> 528 seconds
& G4560 --> 544 seconds

Makes sense! I love repeatable, logical results

Regards,
Vishnu

I think when he originally posted it I saw "my same" and figured he was posting the score again. Didn't notice it was different and one was dual channel and the other was single channel. I'll update tomorrow.

 

[lopri]

encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10

Haha OMG that is crazy. Quoting the 1045T @3.9 GHz result from my earlier post. ^^

encoded 1497 frames in 695.45s (2.15 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

 

[Kallogan]

Dat rizen beast

 

[thepaleobiker]

I think when he originally posted it I saw "my same" and figured he was posting the score again. Didn't notice it was different and one was dual channel and the other was single channel. I'll update tomorrow.

Thank you for the clarification! Yes Single Channel vs Dual Channel....makes a big difference.

 

[nickmania]

intel Q6600 3.0 GHz
4gb RAM
win 10 64 bits

encoded 1497 frames in 1077.10s (1.39 fps), 4190.35 kb/s, Avg QP:25.27

I also have made a test of this file with my AMD RX460 2GB to encode and resize the file in A´s Video Converter using similar settings to handbrake but the GPU instead the CPU. The result is:

encoded in 35 sec. at 42 fps

 

[thepaleobiker]

intel Q6600 3.0 GHz
4gb RAM
win 10 64 bits

encoded 1497 frames in 1077.10s (1.39 fps), 4190.35 kb/s, Avg QP:25.27

I also have made a test of this file with my AMD RX460 2GB to encode and resize the file in A´s Video Converter using similar settings to handbrake but the GPU instead the CPU. The result is:

encoded in 35 sec. at 42 fps

That's a really cool tidbit of a data point. I'll have to go back and do similar test with my RX480. Your RX460 is encoding at > 25x the pace of the Q6600. That's beautiful.

 

[ElFenix]

problem with graphics card conversion is that the quality isn't consistent with using the cpu.

i still need to update the OP.

 

[Huberopa]

encoded 1497 frames in 273,93s (5,46 fps), 3968,06 kb/s, Avg QP:26,15

Processor: AMD FX-6300
Processor Speed: 4.025GHz (17,5x230)
RAM: DDR3-1532 (6.67x230), 4x8GB
CPU_NB 2300
Operating System: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS

 

[Huberopa]

encoded 1497 frames in 616,71s (2,43 fps), 4036,02 kb/s, Avg QP:26,24

AMD A8-5600K 3.60GHz (stock), 16GB DDR3@1866. Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS

Additionally, on Windows 7 it took about 707 seconds.

encoded 1497 frames in 1246.10s (1.20 fps), 3978.83 kb/s, Avg QP:26.14
CPU: Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 9x333=3.0 GHz

and 1207s on stock E8500.

 

[krumme]

encoded 1497 frames in 128.12s (11.68 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Ryzen 1700 non x at 3.8
16 GB DDR4 2666 16 15 15 15 35
Win 10

Well done avx2 performance on a 320 usd processor on a 90usd asus b350m mb, using the cheapest brand 2*8 ram i could get (corsair lpx 3000). Edge out oc 6850. Pretty impressive stuff.

 

[ElFenix]

encoded 1497 frames in 144.75s (10.34 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Running on my Win7x64 virtual machine, with 6gb memory allocated, 32 cores

On a dual E5-2670v1 with PC3-10600R DDR3-Server-Memory-ECC-1333MHz; ESXi 5.5

CPU was around 60% utilized all the way. Sever has 7 more VMs running but mostly idle at the moment.

10th fastest result so far but i'm not sure it should be included in the chart due to the VM handicap

 

[Chiropteran]

encoded 1497 frames in 132.63s (11.29 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Ryzen 1800X Stock CPU (3.64ghz reported during encoding)
32GB DDR4 2666 14-14-14-34
Windows 10

 

[krumme]

encoded 1497 frames in 132.63s (11.29 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

Ryzen 1800X Stock CPU (3.64ghz reported during encoding)
32GB DDR4 2666 14-14-14-34
Windows 10

On such a run what is the cpu voltage then?

 

[mnewsham]

encoded 1497 frames in 146.23s (10.24 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24

5820K @ 4.3GHz
24GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz CL18
Windows 10 x64

 

[lopri]

problem with graphics card conversion is that the quality isn't consistent with using the cpu.

Is it because of the way program is written (software), the way graphics cards works (hardware), or something else? I have been curious about it now that GPUs can do both single/double-precisions.