encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10
encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10
encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10
Is that 3.6ghz on all cores Crono? ThoseRyzen chips are hella quick for productivity tasks.
quoting that one line should be sufficient for what we're doing here. there may be a couple other lines that could bear inspection, i'll read through the old thread and see in the morning.
and even if at some point in the future posting the log file is necessary, just don't delete them?
My same G4600 @ stock 3.6Ghz with HT, no AVX/AVX2, dual-channel DDR4-2400 @ 2400
encoded 1497 frames in 528.50s (2.83 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
I think when he originally posted it I saw "my same" and figured he was posting the score again. Didn't notice it was different and one was dual channel and the other was single channel. I'll update tomorrow.I dont think this above entry has been updated in the main table for your G4600 by OP/Moderator (@ElFenix ). I have a G4560 and completed it in 544 seconds, and in the main post, it says your (@VirtualLarry ) G4600 took 580s with the G4600.... I was surprised because I was expecting mine to come in slightly lower than a G4600..... It looks like the main post is perhaps incorrect.
So G4600 --> 528 seconds
& G4560 --> 544 seconds
Makes sense! I love repeatable, logical results
Regards,
Vishnu
encoded 1497 frames in 132.90s (11.26 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Processor Speed: 3.6GHz
RAM: DDR4-2666
Operating System: Windows 10
encoded 1497 frames in 695.45s (2.15 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Thank you for the clarification! Yes Single Channel vs Dual Channel....makes a big difference.I think when he originally posted it I saw "my same" and figured he was posting the score again. Didn't notice it was different and one was dual channel and the other was single channel. I'll update tomorrow.
That's a really cool tidbit of a data point. I'll have to go back and do similar test with my RX480. Your RX460 is encoding at > 25x the pace of the Q6600. That's beautiful.intel Q6600 3.0 GHz
4gb RAM
win 10 64 bits
encoded 1497 frames in 1077.10s (1.39 fps), 4190.35 kb/s, Avg QP:25.27
I also have made a test of this file with my AMD RX460 2GB to encode and resize the file in A´s Video Converter using similar settings to handbrake but the GPU instead the CPU. The result is:
encoded in 35 sec. at 42 fps
Additionally, on Windows 7 it took about 707 seconds.AMD A8-5600K 3.60GHz (stock), 16GB DDR3@1866. Ubuntu 16.04.1LTSCode:encoded 1497 frames in 616,71s (2,43 fps), 4036,02 kb/s, Avg QP:26,24
and 1207s on stock E8500.encoded 1497 frames in 1246.10s (1.20 fps), 3978.83 kb/s, Avg QP:26.14
CPU: Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 9x333=3.0 GHz
10th fastest result so far but i'm not sure it should be included in the chart due to the VM handicapencoded 1497 frames in 144.75s (10.34 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Running on my Win7x64 virtual machine, with 6gb memory allocated, 32 cores
On a dual E5-2670v1 with PC3-10600R DDR3-Server-Memory-ECC-1333MHz; ESXi 5.5
CPU was around 60% utilized all the way. Sever has 7 more VMs running but mostly idle at the moment.
On such a run what is the cpu voltage then?encoded 1497 frames in 132.63s (11.29 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
Ryzen 1800X Stock CPU (3.64ghz reported during encoding)
32GB DDR4 2666 14-14-14-34
Windows 10
Is it because of the way program is written (software), the way graphics cards works (hardware), or something else? I have been curious about it now that GPUs can do both single/double-precisions.problem with graphics card conversion is that the quality isn't consistent with using the cpu.