Benchmark your Computer with the New Geekbench 3

[BallaTheFeared]

Yeah, I noticed that nice low voltage at 4.9 as well, hyperthreading still enabled even. He just might, and if he doesn't that's just wrong for him to get such a chip. :awe:

I think he needs to tweak his settings, he could get more performance at the same clocks with a bit of work. ()


5.1GHz core 5.1GHz cpuNB - This is all the higher I will go on my $50 air cooler :sneaky:

There is an itch to dust off my custom loop, must resist. :|

 

[Enigmoid]

2931/11277
3630qm @ 3.2 ghz

 

[Pseudoics]

4770K @ 4.8GHz w/HT DDR3 2133

Single: 4547
Multi: 17836

 

[Udgnim]

I think he needs to tweak his settings, he could get more performance at the same clocks with a bit of work. ()

5.1GHz core 5.1GHz cpuNB - This is all the higher I will go on my $50 air cooler :sneaky:

There is an itch to dust off my custom loop, must resist. :|

uncore is at 35X

BLCK 100

RAM is some lower end Corsair DDR 1600 memory

not sure if the benchmark responds to uncore but it definitely responds to RAM speed

what's your RAM running at?

 

[BallaTheFeared]

G-Skill Sniper 1600MHz 9-9-9-24 2T

Running them at 2400MHz 10-13-12-28 1T.


Probably a combination of your ram, and that uncore. Raising your uncore is going to feed your cpu quicker so you might lose the clock speed @ voltage that you're currently achieving, though maybe not.

 

[sefsefsefsef]

I tested out my A10-5750m with and without the ICC patch.

PRE-patch:
1730 / 4873
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8780

POST-patch:
1722 / 4880
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8820

I verified that the ICC patch did its job correctly by having it search again for executables with Intel-specific paths in the Geekbench folder after I patched them up, and it didn't find any.

 

[BallaTheFeared]

Well now, that's disappointing.

 

[crashtech]

I'll be resubmitting my 32-bit scores in a new post.

 

[MontyAC]

S = 3619
M = 14570

cpu -3770K

 

[BallaTheFeared]

How much of a boost is the 64 bit over 32 bit for you?

 

[Udgnim]

messing around with Uncore & RAM

4.6 36X UNCORE, DDR3 1600

4206 / 16586

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8801

4.6 40X UNCORE, DDR3 1600

4222 / 16549

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8809

4.6 43X UNCORE, DDR3 1600

4218 / 16545

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8826

4.6 46X UNCORE, DDR3 1600

BSOD 124 code


4.6 35X UNCORE, DDR3 1800

4284 / 16787

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8859

4.6 35X UNCORE, DDR3 2000

4335 / 16915

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8870

4.6 35X UNCORE, DDR3 2133

4376 / 16925

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8880

4.8 35X UNCORE, DDR3 2133

4528 / 17601

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8901

4.8 35X UNCORE, DDR 2200

4549 / 17607, my top benchmark

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8920

4.8 35X UNCORE, DDR 2400

NO BOOT


got a strange result using 4.9 35X UNCORE, DDR3 1800. I checked that it still had HT enabled.

4517 / 14545

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8945

second attempt to run 4.9 35X UNCORE, DDR3 1800 resulted in a BSOD 101 code

Also BSODed 101 using 4.9 35X UNCORE DDR 2133 some time earlier

Could not boot using 4.8 40X or 35X UNCORE DDR3 2200

 

[CHADBOGA]

CHADBOGA: I just bought a licensed version and the scores increase in 64 bit mode.

Yeah, but I doubt most people here will do that and this is just meant to be a bit of lighthearted fun, so comparing the 32bit scores on the freebie version would appear to be the way to go.

 

[jfpoole]

And even better considering it s compiled with ICC
with numerous "intel only paths"....

Geekbench 3 for Windows is built with Visual C++ 2012 Update 2.

Geekbench 3 for OS X, Linux are built with Clang 3.3.

I'm not sure where the "Intel-only" paths are coming from in the executable. We'll dig into it and I'll post here once we've figured it out.

 

[BallaTheFeared]

4.6 46X UNCORE, DDR3 1600

BSOD 124 code

Your vcore was too low, 4.6GHz was unstable with the faster uncore.

124 is generally vcore

101 is generally uncore.


Edit: As to your strange results, check the timings, are you manually setting them or letting the board auto them?

 

[monstercameron]

PII x4 965BE @ 4.1GHz w/ ddr3 1600MHz

ubuntu 12.04:http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/9232

linux v. windows
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/9232?baseline=8573
single| multi
2070/2063| 7226/7358

it seems that under linux integer and stream scores are higher but windows has floating point perf.
could this be down to the compiler?


​

 

[2is]

2500K @stock, 2780 single 8820 multi. Only using 4GB single channel RAM and it's been a few months since I last fresh installed so that's probably causing a drop.

You don't need to fresh install every few months. Doubt that would help your score outside of the margin of error for this test.

 

[monstercameron]

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/9417

Intel Core Solo T1300 @ 1.66 GHz
ubuntu 12.04

first gen core vs. amd bobcat
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/9417?baseline=8797

clovertrail+ vs. amd bobcat c-50 apu
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/8957?baseline=8797
don't believe this...

also does anyone expect me to believe this??
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/8701?baseline=4252 [exynos 5 octa vs amd a8-4555m]
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/5818?baseline=9439 [i3-3217u vs iphone 5]

this is my all time favorites
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/728?baseline=2553 [i7-4770k vs exynos 5 dual]
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/2631?baseline=2553 [a10-4600m vs exynos 5 dual]

 

[mikk]

How much of a boost is the 64 bit over 32 bit for you?

On my system 5% faster in 64bit mode.

 

[Dresdenboy]

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/9417

Intel Core Solo T1300 @ 1.66 GHz
ubuntu 12.04

first gen core vs. amd bobcat
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/9417?baseline=8797

clovertrail+ vs. amd bobcat c-50 apu
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/8957?baseline=8797
don't believe this...

also does anyone expect me to believe this??
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/8701?baseline=4252 [exynos 5 octa vs amd a8-4555m]
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/5818?baseline=9439 [i3-3217u vs iphone 5]

this is my all time favorites
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/728?baseline=2553 [i7-4770k vs exynos 5 dual]
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/2631?baseline=2553 [a10-4600m vs exynos 5 dual]

The compiler used certainly adds a bias in some inter processor family comparisons.

 

[Arachnotronic]

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/9417

Intel Core Solo T1300 @ 1.66 GHz
ubuntu 12.04

first gen core vs. amd bobcat
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/9417?baseline=8797

clovertrail+ vs. amd bobcat c-50 apu
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/8957?baseline=8797
don't believe this...

also does anyone expect me to believe this??
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/8701?baseline=4252 [exynos 5 octa vs amd a8-4555m]
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/5818?baseline=9439 [i3-3217u vs iphone 5]

this is my all time favorites
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/728?baseline=2553 [i7-4770k vs exynos 5 dual]
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/2631?baseline=2553 [a10-4600m vs exynos 5 dual]

LOL! At least it's not as bad as GB 2 where it showed a 4770k slower than a SHIELD...

 

[monstercameron]

150+W 965BE @ 4.1 vs 35W 5750M @2.5/3.5GHz

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/1619?baseline=9232

looks almost competitive, should it be?

 

[0___________0]

FX-6300 at 4.2ghz.

Single Core: 2221
Multi-Core: 9377

The single threaded increase over Ph II is so small it's irrelevant; kind of sad since it has been 5 years.

 

[Sweepr]

150+W 965BE @ 4.1 vs 35W 5750M @2.5/3.5GHz

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/1619?baseline=9232

looks almost competitive, should it be?

Thats a much higher score than sefsefsefsef and apparently the same notebook (HP Envy 15). Is this because of different OS (Windows vs Linux)?

 

[monstercameron]

Thats a much higher score than sefsefsefsef and apparently the same notebook (HP Envy 15). Is this because of different OS (Windows vs Linux)?

throttling and os?

 

[BallaTheFeared]

On my system 5% faster in 64bit mode.

5% would put me over 5100 in st