ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 32,534
- 15,417
- 136
You picked the loser as your candidate and blame democrats who didn't like her and right wing bigots as the reasons she lost. So what does the mainstream democrat who knew what's best for us do? They emphasized their message to appeal to minority and women voters, people who vote democratic anyway, and failed to message the fact that support for minorities is the result not of their race or color but their abundent representation in class hardest hit by conservative policies. Democrats will just don't want to alienate their major donors with the result that democracy is dead. We are being destroyed by fear of poverty, that somebody will steal our lunch, that the hard working decent in their own minds people will be robbed by the undeserving, by liberals who don't want to work. It is fear that creates the conservative brain defect. With no message of hope to offer those who no longer see a path to the American dream and abandon them to right wing propaganda out of arrogant contempt for their weaknesses, you hand victory to the mass manipulators. That's where democrats fail. You blame the bigots instead of addressing their fears and you do so maybe because you are bigoted similarly just like them, in your case, filled with the arrogance of intellectual superiority.
So we are back to the, "if liberals were nicer to those on the right then they would support more liberals or liberal policies"? Sure. /s
I will say this, I agree that messaging is important in an election and Clinton did not have a good message (or a message at all). To think Bernie's message of negativity (corruption of politics by the millionaire and billionaire class) would have better resonated than trumps "make America great again", despite Bernie's message not even being appealing enough to beat a candidate with no messaging, is quite simply wishful thinking at best and completely ignorant at worst.