LMAO what a tepid endorsement. Who gives a shit about "policy competence" if the policies are bad? I don't want someone that can "find the middle ground" between right wing lunacy and corporate liberalism, that's how you get a kludge like the ACA.
She was a great candidate in terms of policy competence and working with people to find middle ground.
LMAO what a tepid endorsement. Who gives a shit about "policy competence" if the policies are bad? I don't want someone that can "find the middle ground" between right wing lunacy and corporate liberalism, that's how you get a kludge like the ACA.
Her policies (at the big picture level, you know, where you are able to grasp) were the same as Bernie's you ignorant twat.
Yeah, I've heard that talking point before. Two thoughts on that:
1. No they weren't. Universal Single Payer health care is not the same as the ACA no matter how big picture you get.
2. Sanders had a lot of shitty ideas too.
She was a great candidate in terms of policy competence and working with people to find middle ground.
A singular campaign message of Trump = bad does not, a great candidate, make.
And that cherished middle ground is called Wall Street.
A singular campaign message of Trump = bad does not, a great candidate, make.
And that cherished middle ground is called Wall Street.
Lol. You clearly aren't familiar with her policies. She supports universal single payer but unlike Sanders, she realizes that there is no path to that
Link? Hillary has no path to USP because she gets paid too much by the industry. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/10/14/hillary-takes-millions-in-campaign-cash-from-enemies
It's increasingly obvious that USP is the only viable system, so there's a path to it.
Yes, USP, is the way to get there but Bernie did not have a path and Clinton's plan for us closer.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-single-payer-health-care-will-never-ever-happen/
You continue to spout Republican talking points, do you like being a tool for the right?
Universal Single Payer is a Republican talking point. Oookay...
You contradicted yourself from your earlier post that Sanders and Clinton were widely similar. Now, they're not similar, but Clinton is pragmatic while Sanders's policies are "good" but not viable. Turns out the "viable" way involves protecting an industry that gives her huge campaign contributions. Weird how that works out.
You forgot vote for my vagina. That's two campaign messages.A singular campaign message of Trump = bad does not, a great candidate, make.
WTF dude, do you really think she was that great? Forget Bernie, Trump, Putin and the rest. Hillary Clinton in a vacuum. Was she a good candidate?
Yeah, no kidding.
Running away from your own words? Just here to tear down Hilary & the dirty Democrats?
Apparently so.
Running away from your own words? Just here to tear down Hilary & the dirty Democrats?
Apparently so.
Link? Hillary has no path to USP because she gets paid too much by the industry. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/10/14/hillary-takes-millions-in-campaign-cash-from-enemies
It's increasingly obvious that USP is the only viable system, so there's a path to it.
So you're just going with "Crooked Hillary", right?
Where have I heard that before?
You're right. Hillary was a great candidate, ran a great campaign, her policies are the same as Sanders's were, except more practical. Any criticism of her is just repeating Republican talking points. The fact that she was hugely unpopular was just because people couldn't see through the Republican lies.
I have soccer soon. Good night.
You're right. Hillary was a great candidate, ran a great campaign, her policies are the same as Sanders's were, except more practical. Any criticism of her is just repeating Republican talking points. The fact that she was hugely unpopular was just because people couldn't see through the Republican lies.
I have soccer soon. Good night.
Yeah but Trump called Ms Venezuela fat, or something.
HES LITERALLY HITLER ALMOST
It still bottles the mind (like when you're thoughts are trapped in a bottle?) she was schlepping ms venezuela out during the final days of the campaign.
Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign ran television advertisements more "devoid of policy discussions" than any presidential candidate since at least the year 2000, according to a new study published Monday.
The study, conducted by the Wesleyan Media Project, examined political advertising during the 2016 election. Among other conclusions, it found that only 25 percent of Clinton's ads focused on policy, while over 60 percent were personal, or as the study described, "solely about candidate characteristics."
Clinton is the only presidential candidate since at least the 2000 campaign, from either political party, to devote less than 40 percent of her television ads to focus on policy.
"In a typical campaign, ads that focus on candidate character have comprised less than 20 percent of total ad airings, and in some years like 2000, there were hardly any ads that focused on the candidates' character," the study stated.
In comparison, over 70 percent of Donald Trump's television ads "contained at least some discussion of policy."
"The majority of the Clinton campaign's negative advertising attacked Trump’s characteristics and personality," the study found, noting that "fewer than 10 percent of ads attacking Trump focused on his policies whereas about 90 percent was focused on Trump as an individual."
http://freebeacon.com/politics/study-nearly-all-hillary-clintons-tv-ads-didnt-discuss-policy/
Shocked it's only 61%. He was the greatest runnig back of all time!
Showing my age here, but he was awesome.
She was doing fine until buried under a tsunami of slime about Benghazi, her emails, DNC emails, Podesta emails, Wall St, the Clinton Foundation, a fainting spell, Poor Bernie! So cheated! & all the other FUD heaped upon her from Bill's affairs to fucking Pizzagate.
You've repeated most of the memes flung against her while ignoring what Sanders said about it entirely. He endorsed her & called on his supporters to vote for her but they were too involved in propagandized outrage to listen.