Interestingly enough, I have had great CPUs fail Intel's Burn Test at stock settings. I really don't trust the program, to be honest. Same with LinX. I'll use Prime95 for 10 hours or so on Large FFT's to verify any ballpark guesses I've made and access thermal management. Beyond that, I just use a rig as normal. I've had CPU's overclocked using this method run F@H without error for 120 days straight with no reboots.at 3.8ghz (20x190, or 19x200) and 1.27 vcore, prime95 passes for 12+ hours with temps around 68 C. however, intel burntest fails randomly under the "maximum" test, sometimes after 15 runs, sometimes after 2 runs. "standard" test passes. temps never gets higher than 68-70 C.
i then tried to lower it to 3.4 ghz (19x180) and upping vcore to 1.325, burntest at maximum still randomly fails with the temp even lower than before.
any ideas? i've yet to run memtest because i don't have a dvd drive hooked up, will do that tonight.
at 3.8ghz (20x190, or 19x200) and 1.27 vcore, prime95 passes for 12+ hours with temps around 68 C. however, intel burntest fails randomly under the "maximum" test, sometimes after 15 runs, sometimes after 2 runs. "standard" test passes. temps never gets higher than 68-70 C.
i then tried to lower it to 3.4 ghz (19x180) and upping vcore to 1.325, burntest at maximum still randomly fails with the temp even lower than before.
any ideas? i've yet to run memtest because i don't have a dvd drive hooked up, will do that tonight.
i remember the maximum test tooks about 200+ seconds and about 50something gflops. i don't know how to read those results. i was just looking for the other number to be same as the rest.