Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
This is perhaps the worst poll ever.
Originally posted by: jjsole
Sean Connery is an alltime great, but what has he done lately...
Depp, Pitt, and DiCaprio are at the top of their game. My preference goes to Pitt. I also think Philip Seymor Hoffman and Daniel Day Lewis are outstanding.
For old timers that are still great, that would be Hopkins and Freeman. Hoffman and Deniro...can't think of an outstanding performance by them in over a decade.
Originally posted by: elmro
Philip Seymour Hoffman or Daniel Day Lewis
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: angminas
Gary Oldman.
Daniel Day-Lewis is not far behind, and Sir Ian definitely has his moments. Leo is incredible physically, but his diction is often distractingly amateur. Johnny Depp...I like the guy, and he's pretty good, but I'm still waiting to see this elite acting everyone talks about.
Overrated- Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Anthony Hopkins, Jack Nicholson, Christian Bale, Christopher Lee, Kevin Spacey, Bill Murray
Underrated- Tom Cruise, Bruce Willis, Kate Winslet, Dennis Quaid, Brad Pitt, Tim Curry, Sally Field, Keanu Reeves
Untapped potential- Colin Farrell, Louis Gossett Jr., Harrison Ford, Patrick Stewart, Ralph Macchio, Nicholas Cage, Cuba Gooding Jr., Sean Connery, Morgan Freeman, Christopher Lloyd
Notes
I didn't say all the overrated were worthless and all the underrated were gods, or any other retarded nonsense. Don't even start being utterly stupid.
Acting is a combination of physicality, intelligence, script memory, ad lib ability, charisma...a whole list of things. Being great at one or two of them doesn't necessarily mean you're great overall. Nor does being very good at a lot of them.
Figuring out how William Shatner can sometimes be so good when he's usually so bad is the real reason they built the LHC.
And, just kidding about Keanu Reeves :sun:
Tom Cruise and Keanu Reeves are underrated? :laugh: When the best role of your career is playing yourself (asshole movie producer) I'm not sure that qualifies for any award recognition.
Originally posted by: darkxshade
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Jack Nicholson and Leonardo DiCaprio.
I really disliked him for some reason early in his career, maybe it's the pretty boy fad everyone had on him at the time but after seeing his films after Titanic, I'm convinced I was wrong about him. I'm a fan of his work now.
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
It took longer than I thought for Ed Norton to be mentioned.
I'd put him there with Leonardo DiCaprio and probably Kevin Spacey.
And probably Morgan Freeman's voice.
He's mentioned as "the other dude from fight club."
Have you seen Gran Torino?Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: loki8481
Meryl Streep > *
I think so. I'm not a huge fan, but she's very talented. I also like Gary Oldman.
Clint Eastwood is a badass, but that's what he is. A badass.
His talent was clear way before Titanic. What's Eating Gilbert Grape and Romeo and Juliet for example. And the fact is that even though Titanic was a sappy, mushy, romantic chick flick, he was still very good in that movie. He's just solidified his place at the top with The Aviator, The Departed, and Blood DiamondOriginally posted by: darkxshade
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Jack Nicholson and Leonardo DiCaprio.
I really disliked him for some reason early in his career, maybe it's the pretty boy fad everyone had on him at the time but after seeing his films after Titanic, I'm convinced I was wrong about him. I'm a fan of his work now.
Absolutely. It's easy for guys who look like Brad Pitt to become blockbuster stars, although he happens to be a talented actor too. But a guy like Hoffman isn't going to make it without a huge amount of talent.Originally posted by: Locut0s
Philip Seymour Hoffman.
Totally agree. Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Dead Man Walking, I am Sam. You can't get much more range than that.Originally posted by: Mo0o
I hate Sean Penn but that guy has ridiculous range.
Most actors end up just playing 1 character, albeit very well, but still just one character.
Yeah, but American History X alone was enough to show that he's got serious talent.Originally posted by: zinfamous
He hasn't really done anything that great, or even challenging, since Sleepers, or American History X. I feel like Norton has been on the opposite trajectory of DiCaprio.