Best cell phone maker?

[kstu]

Originally posted by: Azurik
Sanyo

/end thread

QFT

 

[geckojohn]

Sony Ericsson are the best! Very good quality.

 

[Captante]

I've had at least one of every phone on your list (except Sanyo) & 2 Audiovox phones ... Motorola is overall by far the best.

 

[vshah]

Originally posted by: mzkhadir
Sony Ericsson

t610 still going strong....hopefully getting a k750i for my birthday

 

[MikeyIs4Dcats]

Originally posted by: Zebo
I just called nextel and they said moto is my only choice because I'm on corp plan there!!!

OK I'm think this has my name all over it with 5 hours talk time and should be pretty rugged.



http://nextelonline.nextel.com/assets/images/phones/i355_l.gif

a friend has one. he's a construction superintendent. It's a rugged phone, but I couldn't imagine carrying one for personal use.

 

[Rock Hydra]

I've had a Nokia and an Audiovox. My Audiovox was by far the better. Thanks for including it in your poll.

 

[bhanson]

I've always had motos. (V710 right now)

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Nokia.

 

[suse920]

moto>lg>nokia from my experience

 

[mugs]

Originally posted by: Azurik
Sanyo

/end thread

Strange, despite your declaring Sanyo the winner and the thread over, it only has 5.33% of the votes.

 

[dug777]

My CDMA nokia 2280 is bullet proof and going strong two years after i bought it

 

[Rubycon]

OKI

 

[merlocka]

If by "good", you mean overall best quality with a focus on cellular performance, audio quality, design, and quality... I would say hands down Motorola.

They tend to lag in features a bit, but as someone that spends too many thousands of minutes a month on a mobile, I'm willing to live without the newest megapixle camera or mp3 player function.

Moto has had their flubs here and there, but overall I think they are putting out good stuff these days. I'm very much looking forward to the Moto Q phone.

 

[vi edit]

After having owned Motorolas for close to 10 years and finally making the switch to a Samsung....I want my Motorola back.

While have more features on paper, the Samsung just seems to take so many more button hits to accomplish the same task. The voice dial on my phone sucks too. My old Motorola had limited voice storage, but at least I only had to hit a button and say a name...virtually hands free.

The Samsung I have to push several buttons before getting there...but with the advantage of having a more "robust" capability of name recognition since it's based on text and not a recorded voice key. While providing virtually unlimited name recognition, it sacrafices convenience.

That...and on the Samsung the buttons are backwards. Very frustrating after using a Moto for nearly 10 years.

I might end up reactivating my old phone. :frown:

 

[NutBucket]

Originally posted by: mugs

Originally posted by: Azurik
Sanyo

/end thread

Strange, despite your declaring Sanyo the winner and the thread over, it only has 5.33% of the votes.

Only because the ONLY makes phones for Sprint.

Sayno does make excellent phones though. Can't say I really have any complaints except some of their phones I've had were ok plagued by rather bad earpieces.

LG is total crap. The only one I've ever owned crapped out after 3.5 months. Got a warranty replacement that is now on ebay.

Current phone is a Samsung A900 and so far so good. Samsung has had a mixed reputation with Sprint anyway. Recent phones have been better though and this one seems just as good as every Sanyo I've had.