Originally posted by: ddd25
Originally posted by: Sentential
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: sangyup81
I'll second the Biostars.
BUT, that proc is not worth getting a new MB. If it doesn't work, RMA the chip or sell it on ebay and move up to socket 754. It's a world of difference even if you get a s754 Sempron 2600+.
Really the chip format affects performance?
Yes it does, more than you can possibly imagine. A64s are the genuine article. They are significantally faster than any AthlonXP. It would be well advised to move to it asap.
In addition to 64bit support (for windows64 which will be out very soon) the peformance is anywhere from 25-35% faster @ the same clock frequency compared to the previous AthlonXPs
I agree that the A64 are better, however, does a stock s754 Sempron 2600+ perform better than a stock AMD Barton 2800+????
The Sempron 2800+ is only $10 more and the Sempron 3000+ is another $10.
If I weren't overclocking, I'd go for the 3000+ but if you overclock, the 2600+ will do just as well as the 3000+. I'm running my Sempron 2600+ at 2.4ghz (stock is 1.6ghz) 1.55v 52°C max load
The XP 2800+ will
not be able to achieve a 50% stable overclock.
The biggest difference between the SocketA and Socket754/939 cpus are that the SocketA memory controllers are on the North Bridge while the Socket 754/939's are directly on the chip. This reduces latencies tremendously and eliminates the performance penalties for using memory asynchronously which you would have to do with your XP2800+.
I wish you coulda asked us before you bought the chip.
If you wanted to keep your mobo, we could have recommended you a chip as well.