Depending on the news source, she's either encouraging rape, or discouraging it with her new plans on changing the rules.
http://www.salon.com/2017/07/14/rep...-bizarre-christian-right-tilt-is-no-accident/
Such groups actively promote the idea that most such accusations come from women who lie about rape to conceal their supposedly slutty behavior or lie about domestic violence to get an advantage in divorce proceedings. MRA groups also argue, in cases where they can’t deny the violence happened, that the victim had it coming.
I tried to steady the boat: “But, I mean, that's just playground logic. You realize we're talking about a 200-pound man assaulting a woman less than half his size. Can we really claim self-defense here?”
“You simply can't scapegoat one participant just because he has the penis,” Crouch said. “If a little person without a penis instigates, she will never be accountable for her actions.”
“I still don't understand how you can see this as a fair fight,” I said. “You're actually defending Ray Rice?”
“I'm not saying he's a good guy. But if she hadn't aggravated him, she wouldn't have been hit. They would say that's blaming the victim. But I don't buy it. And anyway football is always happy to put on pink suits to celebrate women. Why can't they have a week, or just one day, where they celebrate men?”
“They sort of celebrate men every day in the NFL though, right?”
“Sure, but the men are taking all the hits, and then the players' wives organize the NFL breast cancer initiative. Shouldn't football participate in Movember, or do something for prostate awareness?”
In other words, fake news? It starts with a dubious association between "rape culture" skepticism and the christian right, when plenty of people who aren't religious are also skeptical. I think the author of the article probably knows this, and it's therefore a knowingly dishonest angle. Then it claimed that MRA groups have argued that the victims have had it coming, and linked to an article that seemingly doesn't support that statement at all, further proving her dishonesty (I assume it's a woman).
The author claimed MRA(s) argued, in cases undeniably involving sexual violence, that the victims had it coming. This wasn't supported by the link. None of the replies were relevant to this point. It's like you guys don't even care about the truth
I'm sorry, but this woman is an embarrassment to women and mothers everywhere.
Ignore the male part of the equation and just have women up their jesus intake to address campus rape? Go hump a bible you dumb bitch.
If you read the articles, it's more like the men's organization has no problem publicly attacking rape accusers, whether it's true or not.
Or this little gem...regarding ray rice
From the article, aka she had it coming.
That attitude doesn't stop at hitting women either.
Men are not the victims. If you don't want to be accused of rape, don't nail drunk chicks. Oh those poor poor persecuted men
No seriously, tell us how you really feel, man. Dont hold back.
In that case Off is the direction in which I'd like you to fook. Not an issue to be flippant about, certainly not when you know the numbers of victims that I do. Rapists are a special breed of evil to me, if it sounds like I'm a little pissed it's because I am.
While I'm here, you dress funny and should shower more. Your jokes are lame and I resent your halitosis. Should I keep going?
Not if you're going to keep going on shorty. Rape is an act of domination, the affliction of pain by one suffering ego on another. It is an act of utmost violence and cruelty because it is intended to shame and destroy innocence. In any person who is remotely human the act of rape will produce maximum rage but that rage is the desire to make the rapist suffer from exactly what he does. The only problem with that, of course, is that you can't get your hands on all who rape. Your rage is impotent. What we can perhaps do is to create a world where there are less people who have a desire to dominate other and make them suffer what they have suffered. We need to find a way to heal to weaponized our rage in a constructive manner.In that case Off is the direction in which I'd like you to fook. Not an issue to be flippant about, certainly not when you know the numbers of victims that I do. Rapists are a special breed of evil to me, if it sounds like I'm a little pissed it's because I am.
While I'm here, you dress funny and should shower more. Your jokes are lame and I resent your halitosis. Should I keep going?
Needless hostility in a serious P&N thread.
No seriously, tell us how you really feel, man. Dont hold back.
Oh sure, I'm excusing DUi'S with my logic. /'sAnd if that drunk chick drives home after her drunken sexual encounter and gets pulled over can she tell the officer don't arrest me for being over the DWI limit, it's not her fault because she was drunk and couldn't make a coherent decision not to drive just like she wouldn't have had sex with that guy (she is now accusing of rape) while sober?
And for those pedantic type I am not talking about passed out drunk during sex, but an active participant.
And if that drunk chick drives home after her drunken sexual encounter and gets pulled over can she tell the officer don't arrest me for being over the DWI limit, it's not her fault because she was drunk and couldn't make a coherent decision not to drive just like she wouldn't have had sex with that guy (she is now accusing of rape) while sober?
And for those pedantic type I am not talking about passed out drunk during sex, but an active participant.