Biden hints at Obama executive order (concerning guns)

Page 25 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
Actually it doesn't say much.

"Hi, I'm the President, and there are things, vague, nebulous things, that we can and will do through executive order."

That's all we know. I think it's been pretty well established that something like an AWB or magazine ban would require legislation.

I don't know about that...you would think that if something like warrant-less wire taps can be done by EO a silly AWB or magazine ban could be too.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
Actually it doesn't say much.

"Hi, I'm the President, and there are things, vague, nebulous things, that we can and will do through executive order."

That's all we know. I think it's been pretty well established that something like an AWB or magazine ban would require legislation.

It states that he is looking to use his authority through executive order to deal with guns in America. How he plans to do everything has not been shown, but it does show he is willing to use EO. How far he will use it? I have no clue. I can speculate like everyone else, but I'll keep my speculations to myself unless anyone else really wants to know.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,884
569
126
You can ban all the guns you want but the people will still be violent. Our society is based upon personal ambition and greed. If the people are still just as violent inside, gun or no gun, it will make no difference. But I guess the politicians need to score some points by passing more laws.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
You can ban all the guns you want but the people will still be violent. Our society is based upon personal ambition and greed. If the people are still just as violent inside, gun or no gun, it will make no difference. But I guess the politicians need to score some points by passing more laws.

Humans have always been violent and always will be. That's the nature of our evolution. Survival of the fittest and can be seen in every living organism on this planet.

That being said, taking away all guns will not stop people from being violent, but that is not the point to this kind of legislation or EO decision. It never has been.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,884
569
126
Humans have always been violent and always will be. That's the nature of our evolution. Survival of the fittest and can be seen in every living organism on this planet.

That being said, taking away all guns will not stop people from being violent, but that is not the point to this kind of legislation or EO decision. It never has been.

So all humans are violent because of their survival of the fittest mentality? I thought we had higher intelligence and capacity. I thought science cured all our problems dealing with survival. We supposedly have abundant food now, so what is creating more problems?

So you are saying that humans are violent (and supposedly always will be). Therefore, removing guns doesn't really solve any problem, whatsoever. It is like stopping a major leak with a gum. More gun laws will create more government bureaucracy without doing anything. The larger problem remains and that will never be talked about by politicians or the vast majority of people.
 
Last edited:

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
So all humans are violent because of their survival of the fittest mentality? I thought we had higher intelligence and capacity. I thought science cured all our problems dealing with survival. We supposedly have abundant food now, so what is creating more problems?

So you are saying that humans are violent (and supposedly always will be). Therefore, removing guns doesn't really solve any problem, whatsoever. It is like stopping a major leak with a gum. More gun laws will create more government bureaucracy without doing anything. The larger problem remains and that will never be talked about by politicians or the vast majority of people.

Humans can use their intelligence to curb their natural instincts. Just like a dog can learn to obey commands and go against it's natural instinct. Still, that instinct NEVER goes away.

And human nature is the rat race. Always has been and always will be. If violence doesn't make you the biggest alpha male or put you on top of that rat race, then those seeking the top will find what will get them there. The fact many fail to understand this basic principle of human nature is astounding. Humans are animals like any other animal on this planet. Without a toilet we would shit in the mud like them all. Think on what that means.

Humans always have had elements that have done violence for whatever reason. The motive ultimately does not matter. Motives are from an individual standpoint. Whether someone kills for a religious idea, to stop another man from sleeping with his woman, because of a robbery gone wrong, or whatever it doesn't matter. The violence happened. Trying to curb "gun" violence is just dumb. It's just displacement of one type of violence to another. It doesn't solve the problem of human violence against fellow humans. Gun control never will.
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
The frustrating thing about all this is that the controls being discussed will do NOTHINGZ. An "assault weapon" means nothing. Semi auto rifles exist outside of this meaningless concept and shrinking clip size is fucking brain dead.

Why isn't the government addressing things that might actually help? This is just knee jerk nonsense and is not evidence based. Moreover it doesn't even make sense on an intuitive level.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,473
2
0
The frustrating thing about all this is that the controls being discussed will do NOTHINGZ. An "assault weapon" means nothing. Semi auto rifles exist outside of this meaningless concept and shrinking clip size is fucking brain dead.

Why isn't the government addressing things that might actually help? This is just knee jerk nonsense and is not evidence based. Moreover it doesn't even make sense on an intuitive level.

+1000
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Apparently you would like to punish the 99.99% of law abiding gun owners to make yourself feel better. Have you seen the statistics of gun owners who prevent crime? It is a lot higher than the mass murder figures, and I do not believe any NRA member has been found guilty of a horrible crime like in Sandy Hook.

But on topic, I think this thread is absolutely ridiculous and misleading. I am a conservative (libertarian) but holy christ you people need to go. The most that will come of this is;

- More indepth background checks
- Mental health legislation
- Possible ban on magazine sizes
I'd be up for the first two, but the third is merely insane. Not only does it criminalize many existing magazines (at least, to have any effect) but its supposed utility is allowing more breaks so that unarmed people have more of a "chance" to charge the shooter during magazine changes.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
So all humans are violent because of their survival of the fittest mentality? I thought we had higher intelligence and capacity. I thought science cured all our problems dealing with survival. We supposedly have abundant food now, so what is creating more problems?

So you are saying that humans are violent (and supposedly always will be). Therefore, removing guns doesn't really solve any problem, whatsoever. It is like stopping a major leak with a gum. More gun laws will create more government bureaucracy without doing anything. The larger problem remains and that will never be talked about by politicians or the vast majority of people.

Sorry for going way off topic but...
I think over all wise, it will be just what humans are proned to. Just like ants how they rule over there space an elimanate everything in there boundries so do humans...its sort of enivetable. Ice-boxes for example=revolutionary thing...it could be implimented in a good way or a bad way. For instances ice boxes preserve food, so in-terms we dont have to kill so much animals because the food is now rationed which gives the animal more time to recover from what we occaisionally take form there amount...but the flip side is, Ice-boxes can catter to another catagorie of people like wood cutters, in ancient times survival was more just survival. Now it is commercialized...so more wood cutters in terms will cut more wood which has a devistating effect on the eco-system becuse more of the modern prospects is to survive in that fashion.

So in ways science can be more destructive than religon, because most religon respect animals, an so I think if theres a 50/50 religon incorpertaed with science then an agreement can be sought out for the saying as uhh...just like they have animal control, we should have human control as well. Same goes with guns, it could be good an it could be bad, its up the the individual.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
The frustrating thing about all this is that the controls being discussed will do NOTHINGZ. An "assault weapon" means nothing. Semi auto rifles exist outside of this meaningless concept and shrinking clip size is fucking brain dead.

Why isn't the government addressing things that might actually help? This is just knee jerk nonsense and is not evidence based. Moreover it doesn't even make sense on an intuitive level.

This whole thing stems from emotion, which is why it makes no logical sense. Emotion is something that the left and liberals are very good at controlling and molding. Its also why we don't allow victium set sentences for criminals.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,077
136
As gun/ammo sales continue to soar due to speculation, I was wondering if Obama repealed the 2nd amendment yet? I haven't paid the news much attention recently.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
There's plenty. Obama wants an AWB. That means any magazine or weapon capable of firing more than 10 rounds could be made an NFA item. Possession of NFA item without appropriate tax stamp is a felony. This thread shows this administration is willing to do anything including EO to achieve that goal.

Most all weapons people own would be considered an assault weapon because they hold more than 10 rounds = most gun owners would become felons with the stroke of a pen.

Not paying attention, are you?
Do you ever spend time in introspection on why your over-the-top claims are consistently wrong? Obama has announced his executive orders. His "stroke of a pen" includes things like more actively enforcing current background check laws, making it easier for schools to hire safety resources and prepare emergency plans, helping mental health professionals better understand their options for dealing with potentially violent people, and doing more research on preventing violence. Yet for all the hysterical cries in this thread, there is nothing about banning weapons, or even magazines, by executive order. Nothing.

Instead, for such legislative changes Obama's making proposals to Congress for potential legislative action ... just as the Constitution requires. All the attacks insisting he was too stupid or corrupt to understand the Constitution, that they could read Biden's mind and know that what he said wasn't really what he meant, that Obama was certain to use executive orders to violate the 2nd Amendment, all that crazy noise and outrage ... wrong. Again. Which is exactly what the rational people in this thread tried to point out all along. This whole thread, that Obama was going to repeal he 2nd Amendment via executive order, was baseless paranoia by the same gullible puppets who become outraged on demand, over and over and over again.

Pavlov's Clowns, yelping right on cue, just as they've been programmed to do.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
He would if he could, have you not listened to him? Listened to "he demands a stop to any magazine over 10 rounds", "I demand congress pass AWB"

That is a fucking dictator. Thankfully the constitution can stop him. And thank GOD for republicans in the house otherwise his dictatorial demands would be lapped up and passed by the legislative branch. All you need to do is look at NY state for what obama and liberals want.

I am right, you are wrong and purely delusional to what the fuckstain in office really is and what his goals are.
 
Last edited:
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
He would if he could, have you not listened to him? Listened to "he demands a stop to any magazine over 10 rounds", "I demand congress pass AWB"

That is a fucking dictator. Thankfully the constitution can stop him. And thank GOD for republicans in the house otherwise his dictatorial demands would be lapped up and passed by the legislative branch.


I have been saying this all along, This POS has violated the Constitution and his lapdogs still defend him. The leftists kept attacking Conservatives over being so scared but now look at what obama is doing and we were right
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,302
144
106
Do you ever spend time in introspection on why your over-the-top claims are consistently wrong? Obama has announced his executive orders. His "stroke of a pen" includes things like more actively enforcing current background check laws, making it easier for schools to hire safety resources and prepare emergency plans, helping mental health professionals better understand their options for dealing with potentially violent people, and doing more research on preventing violence. Yet for all the hysterical cries in this thread, there is nothing about banning weapons, or even magazines, by executive order. Nothing.

Instead, for such legislative changes Obama's making proposals to Congress for potential legislative action ... just as the Constitution requires. All the attacks insisting he was too stupid or corrupt to understand the Constitution, that they could read Biden's mind and know that what he said wasn't really what he meant, that Obama was certain to use executive orders to violate the 2nd Amendment, all that crazy noise and outrage ... wrong. Again. Which is exactly what the rational people in this thread tried to point out all along. This whole thread, that Obama was going to repeal he 2nd Amendment via executive order, was baseless paranoia by the same gullible puppets who become outraged on demand, over and over and over again.

Pavlov's Clowns, yelping right on cue, just as they've been programmed to do.
qft

Bowfinger GO BOOM!
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
He would if he could, have you not listened to him? Listened to "he demands a stop to any magazine over 10 rounds", "I demand congress pass AWB"

That is a fucking dictator. Thankfully the constitution can stop him. And thank GOD for republicans in the house otherwise his dictatorial demands would be lapped up and passed by the legislative branch. All you need to do is look at NY state for what obama and liberals want.

Lulz! Further evidence Spidey is incapable of accepting reality. Deep in his bunker of denial, he sees only the 3% of the world that matches his fringe beliefs, not the 97% that contradicts them. The simple FACT of the matter is no matter what Obama may personally want, he did not DO what you loudly and repeatedly insisted he would DO. You were wrong. Again.
 
Last edited:

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Lulz! Further evidence Spidey is incapable of accepting reality. Deep in his bunker of denial, he sees only the 3% of the world that matches his fringe beliefs, not the 97% that contradicts them. The simple FACT of the matter is no matter what Obama may personally what, he did not DO what you loudly and repeatedly insisted he would DO. You were wrong. Again.

I explained the potential EO action that could be taken to turn most law abiding gun owners into felons. that was the analysis of the time on what he COULD accomplish.

It has since been found that legislative action would be required to declare AWB and magazines NFA items. But make no mistake that's what he wants. Take a look at what NY state did.

I will continueally knock your dick in the dirt with fact and logic. You are WRONG AGAIN!
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
I have been saying this all along, This POS has violated the Constitution and his lapdogs still defend him. The leftists kept attacking Conservatives over being so scared but now look at what obama is doing and we were right

I usually just ignore you, but I am compelled to quote this as the latest example of why you are widely considered the stupidest and most trollish "person" here. GG.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,473
2
0
Do you ever spend time in introspection on why your over-the-top claims are consistently wrong? Obama has announced his executive orders. His "stroke of a pen" includes things like more actively enforcing current background check laws, making it easier for schools to hire safety resources and prepare emergency plans, helping mental health professionals better understand their options for dealing with potentially violent people, and doing more research on preventing violence. Yet for all the hysterical cries in this thread, there is nothing about banning weapons, or even magazines, by executive order. Nothing.

Instead, for such legislative changes Obama's making proposals to Congress for potential legislative action ... just as the Constitution requires. All the attacks insisting he was too stupid or corrupt to understand the Constitution, that they could read Biden's mind and know that what he said wasn't really what he meant, that Obama was certain to use executive orders to violate the 2nd Amendment, all that crazy noise and outrage ... wrong. Again. Which is exactly what the rational people in this thread tried to point out all along. This whole thread, that Obama was going to repeal he 2nd Amendment via executive order, was baseless paranoia by the same gullible puppets who become outraged on demand, over and over and over again.

Pavlov's Clowns, yelping right on cue, just as they've been programmed to do.

Say what you want but " Acknowledging the difficulty of the Congressional fight ahead, Obama appealed for public support, slamming - as he did in a press conference earlier this week - conservative commentators and the most vocal pro-gun activists for "ginning up" opposition to gun reforms for political reasons.*" reads as a tacit admission that they modified their course of action based on the amount of resistance.

I support universal background checks if they're opening NICS to everyone. I doubt it. If this is a ploy to require FFL only transfers, fuck that unless they are going to mandate free transfers.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |