Yes but I wind up paying having to defend the truth busting a gut to defend it amongst a bunch of imbeciles. Where's the pity and who will make me a nice cup of tea.
It is a Clinton, but it's also a powerful friend with great influence visiting at a crucial time. If Trump had done the same he should damn well have the same treatment. Lynch for her part is no fool. Perhaps it was bad judgement and I'll go with that since I have no factual basis for malicious intent. What it did however was force her out of participation. I'm not saying that would have been the case otherwise as I think it's very wise for her to pass this to Comey. By doing so whatever conversation she had with Bill is moot since the ball is in someone else's court. What really happened? Lord knows, but I have no good reason to suspect her in collusion. Sometimes very smart people do dumb crap. I suspect that was the case here.
How could there be. The meeting was private. Just imagine somebody saying there is no evidence it was anything but evil. You are just one edge of a two edged sword brain dead to the inevitability of the other edge, absolutely certain that only your edge has any right to exist. You do not know.
I can make a proper cuppa. I learned from a wonderful Englishwoman in times long passed.Yes but I wind up paying having to defend the truth busting a gut to defend it amongst a bunch of imbeciles. Where's the pity and who will make me a nice cup of tea.
Now that the FBI has completed their interview, you know, their security review, as Hillary calls it, we can be assured that all will be resolved before the convention. At least the timing is focused, so if there is an indictment coming, it happens before her official coronation...uh, I mean, nomination.
Don't assume too much. There's interviews, checking, rechecking and re interviewing. When there is so much fat which may be fried those in charge of the investigation must be diligent in their methodology. That can take quite some time.
Usually when they interview the major person, they've done all the groundwork, and their focus might be very different than most think, they typically have all their ducks in a row, and the goal is to catch the person in a lie. I imagine she plead the 5th or ignorance to everything they asked, they literally have years of her public comments to work with, I imagine they worked with them pretty extensively, as well as the testimony of everyone else interviewed. The FBI cares about their track record, particularly in high profile cases, that they interviewed her is indicative of what they have nailed down already instead of dropping it.
Usually when they interview the major person, they've done all the groundwork, and their focus might be very different than most think, they typically have all their ducks in a row, and the goal is to catch the person in a lie. I imagine she plead the 5th or ignorance to everything they asked, they literally have years of her public comments to work with, I imagine they worked with them pretty extensively, as well as the testimony of everyone else interviewed. The FBI cares about their track record, particularly in high profile cases, that they interviewed her is indicative of what they have nailed down already instead of dropping it.
"Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was secretary," Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said in a statement. "She is pleased to have had the opportunity to assist the Department of Justice in bringing this review to a conclusion."
Clinton told MSNBC's Chuck Todd Saturday evening that the interview was something "I had been eager to do."
Trump just posted on Facebook that sources have announced there will be no charges. I wonder who the mole is?
Please. the whole thing can't possibly be complete w/o interviewing Clinton, even if that's merely a formality as I suspect.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/02/politics/clinton-meets-with-fbi-as-part-of-email-probe/
Taking the fifth? What planet are you from, anyway?
The one where a presidential candidate is under investigation by the FBI.
The one where the optics of an arraignment for an interview instead of a voluntary one would be bad.
The one where the Clinton Foundation is under investigation by the FBI.
Hell, you're the one in denial saying no major media outlet covered the Lynch Clinton meeting.
"Sources" have been saying that for months. Other "sources" were saying she'd be indicted within 60 days 4 months ago. Go figure.
No charges is totally proof of how the system is corrupt and rigged and not at all an indication of how the media will just totally BS an issue beyond absurdity for their own gain.
I think the endgame is the Clinton Foundation
Think even bigger than that.
The Agenda21 putsch of US sovereignty through Operation Jade Helm, the imminent use of the Amero currency, and the enactment of Sharia law in the contiguous 48 states.
You'll see.How come Alaska and Hawaii get left out of the fun?
But how many administration officials were removed from office or prosecuted? They can make noise, but the shite hits the fan, they do nothing about it.
So if he's that savvy, and indeed there was something nefarious about this meeting, why did it take place completely out in the open?
it didn't take place completely in the open. the meeting was leaked to a single report, if that reporter wasn't told, we would have never known about this meeting.
The one where a presidential candidate is under investigation by the FBI.
The one where the optics of an arraignment for an interview instead of a voluntary one would be bad.
The one where the Clinton Foundation is under investigation by the FBI.
Hell, you're the one in denial saying no major media outlet covered the Lynch Clinton meeting.
Here is a supposed eye witness' account of the meeting.How was this meeting set up?
Here is a supposed eye witness' account of the meeting.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ed-takeoff-to-ensure-loretta-lynch-encounter/