Bill O'Reilly having a meltdown.

[Throckmorton]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."

And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.

 

[UberNeuman]

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

That doesn't matter to the O'Reilly worshipers. They're going to rally 'round and protect their totem....

 

[Jschmuck2]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Jschmuck2

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Jschmuck2

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

Yeah, sure. But most, if not all, are the incomprehensibly awful, pigheaded asshole that Bill O' Reilly is.

Also, I don't like you - stay away from my threads

sarcasm?

anyways... like Bill O'Rielly or not, his strong opinions and reactions have gotten him where he is today which isn't a bad spot to be in.

2005

Pay $9 million
Power Rank 76
N 2005 Rank: NR



E-Score Rank 85

Top Attributes
Aggressive, Intelligent

Talking head

Fox News' bombastic vox populi makes much more than the average-Joe viewers of "The O'Reilly Factor," last year's top-rated cable news program. In addition to his Fox salary, O'Reilly hosts a syndicated radio program and regularly hits the lecture circuit, charging a reported $50,000 per speaking engagement. Author of four best sellers, he also penned "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids," last year's best-selling nonfiction children's book.

http://64.233.169.104/search?q...=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

This is very true. Although I suppose one could say the same of Adolph Hitler. Of course, there is really no comparison between the two. O'Reilly has murdered far fewer innocent Jews.

That we know of, anyhow.

Godwin's Law rears its' ugly head. :laugh:

Would Pol Pot have been a more timely reference?

 

[xSauronx]

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

i curse about things that annoy me, and i do it on a regular basis. *shrug* i wish i had some of them on video, however

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."

And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.

Semantics Vic. You know the point he was making.
UberNeuman convicted O'Rielly of sexual harassment just by the sentence he typed up to link the article.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

You realize you're talking about someone who has made a successful career of acting superior and tearing apart people when they're down, right?

Irrelivent. We aren't talking about the man's career, we are talking about him being stressed over coworkers incompetance. His point was that everyone has reacted the same way at some point over their coworkers incompetance.

No matter how much everyone might have reacted the same at some point in their lives, you should be able to recognize that O'Reilly has made a career of attacking others for even less, so it's all well and good for him to be attacked in this fashion. Don't you believe in accountability?

None of which is relevant to the point being made that everyone has reacted in a similar fashion to coworker incompetence. If you want to start a Bill bashing thread go ahead and do that.

As attacking people at these kind of inopportune moments is how O'Reilly has made his career, I said it's fully relevant, and you're supporting hypocrisy.

And this is a Bill bashing thread, idiot.

 

[HannibalX]

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

I don't presume to judge people where I do not have accurate information. What we know is that someone accused Bill of sexual harassment and sued him in civil court. This person didn't call the police, they didn't try to have him held criminally accountable - they sued him for monetary gain. That is the information we have. I can't judge a person with that information.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Jschmuck2

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Jschmuck2

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Jschmuck2

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

Yeah, sure. But most, if not all, are the incomprehensibly awful, pigheaded asshole that Bill O' Reilly is.

Also, I don't like you - stay away from my threads

sarcasm?

anyways... like Bill O'Rielly or not, his strong opinions and reactions have gotten him where he is today which isn't a bad spot to be in.

2005

Pay $9 million
Power Rank 76
N 2005 Rank: NR



E-Score Rank 85

Top Attributes
Aggressive, Intelligent

Talking head

Fox News' bombastic vox populi makes much more than the average-Joe viewers of "The O'Reilly Factor," last year's top-rated cable news program. In addition to his Fox salary, O'Reilly hosts a syndicated radio program and regularly hits the lecture circuit, charging a reported $50,000 per speaking engagement. Author of four best sellers, he also penned "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids," last year's best-selling nonfiction children's book.

http://64.233.169.104/search?q...=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

This is very true. Although I suppose one could say the same of Adolph Hitler. Of course, there is really no comparison between the two. O'Reilly has murdered far fewer innocent Jews.

That we know of, anyhow.

Godwin's Law rears its' ugly head. :laugh:

Would Pol Pot have been a more timely reference?

you're a nutjob. :laugh:

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

That doesn't matter to the O'Reilly worshipers. They're going to rally 'round and protect their totem....

i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.

 

[UberNeuman]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

I don't presume to judge people where I do not have accurate information. What we know is that someone accused Bill of sexual harassment and sued him in civil court. This person didn't call the police, they didn't try to have him held criminally accountable - they sued him for monetary gain. That is the information we have. I can't judge a person with that information.

It's too bad that O'Reilly doesn't hold himself to your standards then........

 

[HannibalX]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

You realize you're talking about someone who has made a successful career of acting superior and tearing apart people when they're down, right?

Irrelivent. We aren't talking about the man's career, we are talking about him being stressed over coworkers incompetance. His point was that everyone has reacted the same way at some point over their coworkers incompetance.

No matter how much everyone might have reacted the same at some point in their lives, you should be able to recognize that O'Reilly has made a career of attacking others for even less, so it's all well and good for him to be attacked in this fashion. Don't you believe in accountability?

None of which is relevant to the point being made that everyone has reacted in a similar fashion to coworker incompetence. If you want to start a Bill bashing thread go ahead and do that.

As attacking people at these kind of inopportune moments is how O'Reilly has made his career, I said it's fully relevant, and you're supporting hypocrisy.

And this is a Bill bashing thread, idiot.

A personal attack? Come on now, isn't that what you are acusing Bill of?

Again - the original comment was that anyone here has reacted the same way to coworker incompetence at some point. All you have done is attack the man. I never said he is or is not guilty of what you accuse him of. I simply am agreeing with Amused that anyone here has reacted the same way at some point because of coworker incompetence. You seem to just want to bash the guy.

 

[HannibalX]

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

I don't presume to judge people where I do not have accurate information. What we know is that someone accused Bill of sexual harassment and sued him in civil court. This person didn't call the police, they didn't try to have him held criminally accountable - they sued him for monetary gain. That is the information we have. I can't judge a person with that information.

It's too bad that O'Reilly doesn't hold himself to your standards then........

Perhaps.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."

And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.

Semantics Vic. You know the point he was making.
UberNeuman convicted O'Rielly of sexual harassment just by the sentence he typed up to link the article.

I'm not even sure how to interpret this crock of sh!t.
So a windbag of spewing negative emotion and propagandistic lies is your hero too?

 

[HannibalX]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

That doesn't matter to the O'Reilly worshipers. They're going to rally 'round and protect their totem....

i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.

I think it's damn funny as well. I don't really care for him, and I choose not to watch his show. Simple as that.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."

And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.

Semantics Vic. You know the point he was making.
UberNeuman convicted O'Rielly of sexual harassment just by the sentence he typed up to link the article.

I'm not even sure how to interpret this crock of sh!t.
So a windbag of spewing negative emotion and propagandistic lies is your hero too?

i'll try to be civil, but will say this isn't P&N, and you've made anyone reading this thread question that.

as far as your question, i take it you didn't read my last post:

i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.

 

[OrByte]

forgive me for not going hogsh!t wild over Bill O'Reilly.

Still I do think he is a douche...without going hogsh!t wild that is...



he is a propoganda machine that no one should take seriously.

The video certainly shows a stressed out person. Since I don't know what its like working in front of a camera like that I can't imagine the level of stress involved.

he isnt someone I'd want to work with.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You don't think they settled for a reason?

That doesn't matter to the O'Reilly worshipers. They're going to rally 'round and protect their totem....

i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.

I think it's damn funny as well. I don't really care for him, and I choose not to watch his show. Simple as that.

i don't watch it either. i know who he is. i know he's succesful. i know people have strong opinions about his opinions.

also, i agree with you that this thread didn't start out as a bash-everything-about-Bill-O'Reilly thread. it was, for a short time, about losing your temper when people and equipment screw up.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

You realize you're talking about someone who has made a successful career of acting superior and tearing apart people when they're down, right?

Irrelivent. We aren't talking about the man's career, we are talking about him being stressed over coworkers incompetance. His point was that everyone has reacted the same way at some point over their coworkers incompetance.

No matter how much everyone might have reacted the same at some point in their lives, you should be able to recognize that O'Reilly has made a career of attacking others for even less, so it's all well and good for him to be attacked in this fashion. Don't you believe in accountability?

None of which is relevant to the point being made that everyone has reacted in a similar fashion to coworker incompetence. If you want to start a Bill bashing thread go ahead and do that.

As attacking people at these kind of inopportune moments is how O'Reilly has made his career, I said it's fully relevant, and you're supporting hypocrisy.

And this is a Bill bashing thread, idiot.

A personal attack? Come on now, isn't that what you are acusing Bill of?

Again - the original comment was that anyone here has reacted the same way to coworker incompetence at some point. All you have done is attack the man. I never said he is or is not guilty of what you accuse him of. I simply am agreeing with Amused that anyone here has reacted the same way at some point because of coworker incompetence. You seem to just want to bash the guy.

I'm not accusing O'Reilly of being anything but a media talking head who spews opinionated nonsense for entertainment purposes.

What you are doing is defending someone in a situation for which that same someone is famous for attacking people in. In other words, you're supporting hypocrisy. That it's alright for O'Reilly to kick people when they're down but it's not alright to kick O'Reilly when he is down.
This is so painfully obvious that, like your comments that I should start my own "Bill bashing" thread when we are already in a Bill bashing thread, that the only conclusion that any reasonable person could possibly come to is that you're an idiot and you're trying to beat me over the head with your idiocy.

 

[Vette73]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

You do know he came out saying it was ALL untrue and false and the courts would show that. In fact HE filed the lawsuit first not her.
Then it came out she recorded what he did/said and all of a sudden he paid several million dollars to keep the tapes closed. If I remember correct 1 part of the settlemnst was that the tapes never see the day of light and if they do she has to pay back all the money.

Thats not hearsay, thats fact.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."

And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.

Semantics Vic. You know the point he was making.
UberNeuman convicted O'Rielly of sexual harassment just by the sentence he typed up to link the article.

I'm not even sure how to interpret this crock of sh!t.
So a windbag of spewing negative emotion and propagandistic lies is your hero too?

i'll try to be civil, but will say this isn't P&N, and you've made anyone reading this thread question that.

as far as your question, i take it you didn't read my last post:

i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.

So this explains why you're going so "hogshit wild" over defending him that you could find the mental wherewithal to flip the logical world upside-down and call it "semantics?"



Clearly to you, all animal are equal, but some are more equal than others...

 

[HannibalX]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

You realize you're talking about someone who has made a successful career of acting superior and tearing apart people when they're down, right?

Irrelivent. We aren't talking about the man's career, we are talking about him being stressed over coworkers incompetance. His point was that everyone has reacted the same way at some point over their coworkers incompetance.

No matter how much everyone might have reacted the same at some point in their lives, you should be able to recognize that O'Reilly has made a career of attacking others for even less, so it's all well and good for him to be attacked in this fashion. Don't you believe in accountability?

None of which is relevant to the point being made that everyone has reacted in a similar fashion to coworker incompetence. If you want to start a Bill bashing thread go ahead and do that.

As attacking people at these kind of inopportune moments is how O'Reilly has made his career, I said it's fully relevant, and you're supporting hypocrisy.

And this is a Bill bashing thread, idiot.

A personal attack? Come on now, isn't that what you are acusing Bill of?

Again - the original comment was that anyone here has reacted the same way to coworker incompetence at some point. All you have done is attack the man. I never said he is or is not guilty of what you accuse him of. I simply am agreeing with Amused that anyone here has reacted the same way at some point because of coworker incompetence. You seem to just want to bash the guy.

I'm not accusing O'Reilly of being anything but a media talking head who spews opinionated nonsense for entertainment purposes.

What you are doing is defending someone in a situation for which that same someone is famous for attacking people in. In other words, you're supporting hypocrisy. That it's alright for O'Reilly to kick people when they're down but it's not alright to kick O'Reilly when he is down.
This is so painfully obvious that, like your comments that I should start my own "Bill bashing" thread when we are already in a Bill bashing thread, that the only conclusion that any reasonable person could possibly come to is that you're an idiot and you're trying to beat me over the head with your idiocy.

No, I was agreeing with Amused's comment and defending that which really has nothing to do with Bill at all. Anyone could have been in the video. The point was that anyone here has reacted the same way at some point because of coworker incompetence.

You look like the one having the melt down now. :laugh:

Now you have called me an idiot twice for no real reason. Mods? I don't want to have to send a PM about your personal attacks.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....

So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?

No?

Then it's all hearsay.

First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."

And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.

Semantics Vic. You know the point he was making.
UberNeuman convicted O'Rielly of sexual harassment just by the sentence he typed up to link the article.

I'm not even sure how to interpret this crock of sh!t.
So a windbag of spewing negative emotion and propagandistic lies is your hero too?

i'll try to be civil, but will say this isn't P&N, and you've made anyone reading this thread question that.

as far as your question, i take it you didn't read my last post:

i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.

So this explains why you're going so "hogshit wild" over defending him that you could find the mental wherewithal to flip the logical world upside-down and call it "semantics?"



Clearly to you, all animal are equal, but some are more equal than others...

you have some anger issues. i hope you find help soon. under all of it there is probably a good guy who has some love in his heart.

have a good day Vic. i won't be responding to your vitriol again in this thread.

 

[RightIsWrong]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Irrelivent. We aren't talking about the man's career, we are talking about him being stressed over coworkers incompetance. His point was that everyone has reacted the same way at some point over their coworkers incompetance.

Why are you assuming that it was "co-worker's incompetence"?

It sounded to me like it was his own issue. One that was set off by not knowing what a simple phrase meant and his inability to be able to read the line as written.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Pale Rider

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Amused
Amazing. I will bet money most, if not all the people tearing him apart have, at least once in their lives, reacted the very same way when in an extremely frustrating situation and pressed by time and the screw ups of others. Their fits just weren't recorded, so they can act all superior.

You realize you're talking about someone who has made a successful career of acting superior and tearing apart people when they're down, right?

Irrelivent. We aren't talking about the man's career, we are talking about him being stressed over coworkers incompetance. His point was that everyone has reacted the same way at some point over their coworkers incompetance.

No matter how much everyone might have reacted the same at some point in their lives, you should be able to recognize that O'Reilly has made a career of attacking others for even less, so it's all well and good for him to be attacked in this fashion. Don't you believe in accountability?

None of which is relevant to the point being made that everyone has reacted in a similar fashion to coworker incompetence. If you want to start a Bill bashing thread go ahead and do that.

As attacking people at these kind of inopportune moments is how O'Reilly has made his career, I said it's fully relevant, and you're supporting hypocrisy.

And this is a Bill bashing thread, idiot.

A personal attack? Come on now, isn't that what you are acusing Bill of?

Again - the original comment was that anyone here has reacted the same way to coworker incompetence at some point. All you have done is attack the man. I never said he is or is not guilty of what you accuse him of. I simply am agreeing with Amused that anyone here has reacted the same way at some point because of coworker incompetence. You seem to just want to bash the guy.

I'm not accusing O'Reilly of being anything but a media talking head who spews opinionated nonsense for entertainment purposes.

What you are doing is defending someone in a situation for which that same someone is famous for attacking people in. In other words, you're supporting hypocrisy. That it's alright for O'Reilly to kick people when they're down but it's not alright to kick O'Reilly when he is down.
This is so painfully obvious that, like your comments that I should start my own "Bill bashing" thread when we are already in a Bill bashing thread, that the only conclusion that any reasonable person could possibly come to is that you're an idiot and you're trying to beat me over the head with your idiocy.

No, I was agreeing with Amused's comment and defending that which really has nothing to do with Bill at all. Anyone could have been in the video. The point was that anyone here has reacted the same way at some point because of coworker incompetence.

You look like the one having the melt down now. :laugh:

Now you have called me an idiot twice for no real reason. Mods? I don't want to have to send a PM about your personal attacks.

Ah... cry to the mods... :roll:

I explained my reasoning quite clearly. Your next tactic, I am sure, will be to argue steadfastly that 2+2=5 and then play the victim card when people get sick of your bullshit.