Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: JujuFish
Wow, Vic, you are one sad little man.
Nah he's kind of like O'Riely, he doesn't suffer fools well.
He does meltdown well though. :laugh:
Please provide evidence of me having a meltdown in this thread.
BTW, it doesn't look like the mods agree with your crybaby act.
Brag all you want. Anyone can read the thread and see you tossing personal attacks for no reason. That's a meltdown. :light: :laugh:
I have been civil the entire thead, but when someone doesn't agree with you then you attack them like a child.
I don't have to show you anything because you have already shown the entire ATOT.
I provided reason, and no, you haven't been civil, and you definitely played the child.
I do have difficulty understanding why playing stupid in the face of overwhelming logic and evidence somehow equates to oneupsmanship, but apparently Bill taught you how to do it well.
odd. when i read the thread i see him being civil then you calling him a idiot. then you call people names who say they can understand why he did it.
these glasses are kinda old though might be seeing things.but don't think so.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
LOL @ those bickering over the degree of O'Rielly's Douchebaggery:laugh:
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: JujuFish
Wow, Vic, you are one sad little man.
Nah he's kind of like O'Riely, he doesn't suffer fools well.
He does meltdown well though. :laugh:
Please provide evidence of me having a meltdown in this thread.
BTW, it doesn't look like the mods agree with your crybaby act.
Brag all you want. Anyone can read the thread and see you tossing personal attacks for no reason. That's a meltdown. :light: :laugh:
I have been civil the entire thead, but when someone doesn't agree with you then you attack them like a child.
I don't have to show you anything because you have already shown the entire ATOT.
I provided reason, and no, you haven't been civil, and you definitely played the child.
I do have difficulty understanding why playing stupid in the face of overwhelming logic and evidence somehow equates to oneupsmanship, but apparently Bill taught you how to do it well.
odd. when i read the thread i see him being civil then you calling him a idiot. then you call people names who say they can understand why he did it.
these glasses are kinda old though might be seeing things.but don't think so.
Willful and/or ignorant obfuscation does not fall under my definition of civil behavior. I called him an idiot because he was acting it, and I stand by that. I mean, c'mon... when the subject of the sexual harassment lawsuit came up (which O'Reilly started BTW by suing the woman before she even sued him, a new low for anyone), Pale Rider's response was that he was never found guilty by a court. Forget the fact that sexual harassment isn't a crime, or that Bill couldn't settle out of court fast enough as soon as word of the tapes came out... this guy deserves the benefit of the doubt that he has never given others.
So let's over ourselves, eh? O'Reilly is a tool.. He makes a living off kicking people when they're down, all vitriol and lies, and yet his fans tell us we're supposed to be kind to him when he has off-moment? If that isn't hypocrisy, I don't know what is.
But hey, as fighting fire with fire is the only way known to deal with these tactics, I did enjoy showing you guys what it feels like. Maybe... just maybe... you'll quit excusing it (or even endorsing it) when your little heroes on TV do it to others. Nah... that'd be too much to hope for...
Originally posted by: Vic
Meh. My sense of humor is off today. I cut off nearly half the fingernail of my left index finger while chopping an onion yesterday, and it throbs like hell with every keystroke.
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Vic
Meh. My sense of humor is off today. I cut off nearly half the fingernail of my left index finger while chopping an onion yesterday, and it throbs like hell with every keystroke.
you should be used to typing with one hand anway!
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Wow, so being a moron gets you pretty far in life.
LINK DELETED
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....
So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?
No?
Then it's all hearsay.
You don't think they settled for a reason?
That doesn't matter to the O'Reilly worshipers. They're going to rally 'round and protect their totem....
i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: moshquerade
i'll try to be civil, but will say this isn't P&N, and you've made anyone reading this thread question that.Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....
So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?
No?
Then it's all hearsay.
First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."
And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.
Semantics Vic. You know the point he was making.
UberNeuman convicted O'Rielly of sexual harassment just by the sentence he typed up to link the article.
I'm not even sure how to interpret this crock of sh!t.
So a windbag of spewing negative emotion and propagandistic lies is your hero too?
as far as your question, i take it you didn't read my last post:
i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.
So this explains why you're going so "hogshit wild" over defending him that you could find the mental wherewithal to flip the logical world upside-down and call it "semantics?"
Clearly to you, all animal are equal, but some are more equal than others...
you have some anger issues. i hope you find help soon. under all of it there is probably a good guy who has some love in his heart.
have a good day Vic. i won't be responding to your vitriol again in this thread.
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: JujuFish
Wow, Vic, you are one sad little man.
Nah he's kind of like O'Riely, he doesn't suffer fools well.
He does meltdown well though. :laugh:
Please provide evidence of me having a meltdown in this thread.
BTW, it doesn't look like the mods agree with your crybaby act.
Brag all you want. Anyone can read the thread and see you tossing personal attacks for no reason. That's a meltdown. :light: :laugh:
I have been civil the entire thead, but when someone doesn't agree with you then you attack them like a child.
I don't have to show you anything because you have already shown the entire ATOT.
I provided reason, and no, you haven't been civil, and you definitely played the child.
I do have difficulty understanding why playing stupid in the face of overwhelming logic and evidence somehow equates to oneupsmanship, but apparently Bill taught you how to do it well.
odd. when i read the thread i see him being civil then you calling him a idiot. then you call people names who say they can understand why he did it.
these glasses are kinda old though might be seeing things.but don't think so.
Willful and/or ignorant obfuscation does not fall under my definition of civil behavior. I called him an idiot because he was acting it, and I stand by that. I mean, c'mon... when the subject of the sexual harassment lawsuit came up (which O'Reilly started BTW by suing the woman before she even sued him, a new low for anyone), Pale Rider's response was that he was never found guilty by a court. Forget the fact that sexual harassment isn't a crime, or that Bill couldn't settle out of court fast enough as soon as word of the tapes came out... this guy deserves the benefit of the doubt that he has never given others.
So let's over ourselves, eh? O'Reilly is a tool.. He makes a living off kicking people when they're down, all vitriol and lies, and yet his fans tell us we're supposed to be kind to him when he has off-moment? If that isn't hypocrisy, I don't know what is.
But hey, as fighting fire with fire is the only way known to deal with these tactics, I did enjoy showing you guys what it feels like. Maybe... just maybe... you'll quit excusing it (or even endorsing it) when your little heroes on TV do it to others. Nah... that'd be too much to hope for...
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: moshquerade
i'll try to be civil, but will say this isn't P&N, and you've made anyone reading this thread question that.Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Stop picking on Big Bill, it's perfectly normal to have a bad day and sexually harass women....
So a court of law found him guilty of sexual harrasment?
No?
Then it's all hearsay.
First, sexual harassment is not a crime, so he could have never have been found "guilty."
And second, he did pay a very large settlement to keep it out of court IIRC.
Semantics Vic. You know the point he was making.
UberNeuman convicted O'Rielly of sexual harassment just by the sentence he typed up to link the article.
I'm not even sure how to interpret this crock of sh!t.
So a windbag of spewing negative emotion and propagandistic lies is your hero too?
as far as your question, i take it you didn't read my last post:
i don't worship the guy. i do think it's funny that people go hogshit wild over someone like him, practically calling him the anti-christ.
So this explains why you're going so "hogshit wild" over defending him that you could find the mental wherewithal to flip the logical world upside-down and call it "semantics?"
Clearly to you, all animal are equal, but some are more equal than others...
you have some anger issues. i hope you find help soon. under all of it there is probably a good guy who has some love in his heart.
have a good day Vic. i won't be responding to your vitriol again in this thread.
Because Vic completely and utterly OWNED you, eh Mosh?
And so you pull the kumbaya card? Lame. Very, very lame.
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Wow, so being a moron gets you pretty far in life.