Originally posted by: crystal
Originally posted by: moshquerade
they should move his name to the "Wall of Shame".Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I say take his name down. The guy killed two people in cold blood...He's lucky he's not in prison.
His peers judged him not guilty of the crimes. Whether or not you agree with the decision, you don't want this country court system turns into guilty until proven innocence.
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: crystal
Originally posted by: moshquerade
they should move his name to the "Wall of Shame".Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I say take his name down. The guy killed two people in cold blood...He's lucky he's not in prison.
His peers judged him not guilty of the crimes. Whether or not you agree with the decision, you don't want this country court system turns into guilty until proven innocence.
wow you're kidding right?
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: akshatp
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: akshatp
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I say take his name down. The guy killed two people in cold blood...He's lucky he's not in prison.
You can prove this? Damn they should have came to you during the trial!
It was proven with the evidence during the trial. The jury acquitted him because they are a bunch of blithering idiots.
Let me ask you this, do you believe he didn't commit those murders? And don't give me the crap about he was acquitted therefore he is innocent and/or not guilty either. I'm asking you what you believe.
There are people guilty of murder running around free in this country and there are innocent people who are in prison. The justice system fails. It failed miserably in this case.
I believe he is guilty. I beleive he killed those people.
But the bottom line is the judicial system, no matter how flawed, found him innocent. This and only this is what counts in this country, so you can't go pulling his name down for something he did that wasn't proven.
I'm not saying its right. Its just the way it is.
Sure you can.
Proof.
Just like Hollywood can, and did, stop hiring him for movies following his acquittal. OJ's acting career came to a halt faster than a Mazda Miata in a NHTSA front impact crash test.
More proof.
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: akshatp
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: akshatp
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I say take his name down. The guy killed two people in cold blood...He's lucky he's not in prison.
You can prove this? Damn they should have came to you during the trial!
It was proven with the evidence during the trial. The jury acquitted him because they are a bunch of blithering idiots.
Let me ask you this, do you believe he didn't commit those murders? And don't give me the crap about he was acquitted therefore he is innocent and/or not guilty either. I'm asking you what you believe.
There are people guilty of murder running around free in this country and there are innocent people who are in prison. The justice system fails. It failed miserably in this case.
I believe he is guilty. I beleive he killed those people.
But the bottom line is the judicial system, no matter how flawed, found him innocent. This and only this is what counts in this country, so you can't go pulling his name down for something he did that wasn't proven.
I'm not saying its right. Its just the way it is.
Sure you can.
Proof.
Just like Hollywood can, and did, stop hiring him for movies following his acquittal. OJ's acting career came to a halt faster than a Mazda Miata in a NHTSA front impact crash test.
More proof.
How is it proven? That's not "proof" of anything.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: akshatp
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: akshatp
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I say take his name down. The guy killed two people in cold blood...He's lucky he's not in prison.
You can prove this? Damn they should have came to you during the trial!
It was proven with the evidence during the trial. The jury acquitted him because they are a bunch of blithering idiots.
Let me ask you this, do you believe he didn't commit those murders? And don't give me the crap about he was acquitted therefore he is innocent and/or not guilty either. I'm asking you what you believe.
There are people guilty of murder running around free in this country and there are innocent people who are in prison. The justice system fails. It failed miserably in this case.
I believe he is guilty. I beleive he killed those people.
But the bottom line is the judicial system, no matter how flawed, found him innocent. This and only this is what counts in this country, so you can't go pulling his name down for something he did that wasn't proven.
I'm not saying its right. Its just the way it is.
Sure you can.
Proof.
Just like Hollywood can, and did, stop hiring him for movies following his acquittal. OJ's acting career came to a halt faster than a Mazda Miata in a NHTSA front impact crash test.
More proof.
How is it proven? That's not "proof" of anything.
Did you even read my post? :roll: Nevermind, it's quite clear to me that you did not.
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Give the guy a break. Jeez. The jury found him innocent. INNOCENT.
Innocent until proven guilty and he has been proven inocent. End os discussion. I dont care what all those crackpot conspiracy theory armchair psychics/lawyers/prosecutors/and executioners think.
The system proved him innocent so let it go already.
Originally posted by: Number1
The only thing that should be taken down is OJ himself.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
yeh, but Simpson was found liable for their deaths in civil court where they didn't have a starstruck jury presiding.Originally posted by: crystal
Originally posted by: moshquerade
they should move his name to the "Wall of Shame".Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I say take his name down. The guy killed two people in cold blood...He's lucky he's not in prison.
His peers judged him not guilty of the crimes. Whether or not you agree with the decision, you don't want this country court system turns into guilty until proven innocence.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Give the guy a break. Jeez. The jury found him innocent. INNOCENT.
Innocent until proven guilty and he has been proven inocent. End os discussion. I dont care what all those crackpot conspiracy theory armchair psychics/lawyers/prosecutors/and executioners think.
WRONG!!! The jury did NOT find him innocent. They found him not guilty...not the same thing.
The system proved him innocent so let it go already.
This is a completely ridiculous statement. The only thing the system proved in this case was how fallible it can be.
Originally posted by: Beachboy
Geez, kill a couple of people and everybody is on your case. :roll:
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Give the guy a break. Jeez. The jury found him innocent. INNOCENT.
Innocent until proven guilty and he has been proven inocent. End os discussion. I dont care what all those crackpot conspiracy theory armchair psychics/lawyers/prosecutors/and executioners think.
WRONG!!! The jury did NOT find him innocent. They found him not guilty...not the same thing.
The system proved him innocent so let it go already.
This is a completely ridiculous statement. The only thing the system proved in this case was how fallible it can be.
Oh you must be the omniescent almighty. Why dont you go Smite OJ then, obviously you know better than the court system and the court sytem cant be right because you "Know" he did it.
Wave hi to buddha to me by the way.
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Give the guy a break. Jeez. The jury found him innocent. INNOCENT.
Innocent until proven guilty and he has been proven inocent. End os discussion. I dont care what all those crackpot conspiracy theory armchair psychics/lawyers/prosecutors/and executioners think.
WRONG!!! The jury did NOT find him innocent. They found him not guilty...not the same thing.
The system proved him innocent so let it go already.
This is a completely ridiculous statement. The only thing the system proved in this case was how fallible it can be.
Oh you must be the omniescent almighty. Why dont you go Smite OJ then, obviously you know better than the court system and the court sytem cant be right because you "Know" he did it.
Wave hi to buddha to me by the way.
Please, if you have that much faith in the judiciary system then you are a tard. Are people really this stupid?
Originally posted by: mwmorph
aka the 12 people that actually sat in and voted him not guilty.