Yea, that's what pushed me out of finance. I can't imagine people who use money as a scoreboard and a way to judge self worth. Operations/Strategy is a waaay better fit for me.
Don't you ever run into moral hazard issues in your job? The money has to come from someone somewhere in a zero sum game. In essence the better you are at your job the more poor you make another. You can see this in how Wall Street salaries and bonuses have exploded at the cost of taking wage increases from other sectors. Is society really benefiting by having a 25 year old Investment Banker making $300k? One of my good friends lost his job at Citadel(when he was 20) because of moral issues and someone stabbing him in the back.
I saw the back stabbing, especially during the downturn. It was brutal. Every little thing that somebody could use as leverage, they used. My group went from 9 to 3 pretty quickly.
I saw some pretty amoral things but I wasn't in trading so I didn't see the worst of it.
Mostly I just saw stupid things. People just didn't understand the business they were in.
As far as this whole TA BS, it doesn't do a single thing for you. There's a reason why the wealthiest people in the world are not technical traders, they fundamental investors.
As halik said, the fools using TA as some proof of concept are falling for confirmation bias and reporting bias. They are more than willing to tell you when it works but are not willing to tell you when it doesn't. Furthermore, in investing, it is far better to be good than lucky because the margin of error is low and the severity is high. You only have to look at somebody like Ackman or Paulson (sino forest) to see that. Instead you look towards somebody like Seth Klarman or Gundlach and see what real investors are like.