You sure don't.Do you know Georgia law?
Do you know any state laws on this? There is no universal law of what a deadly weapon is. You're clearly not a lawyer because you would understand how asinine your statement was.
You didn't refute shit.
Ok, good to know you are conceding this issue since the DA has clearly indisputably taken the position the taser is not a deadly weapon in this specific context.lol there is simply no better source for Georgia law then the Georgia DA himself.
Ok, good to know you are conceding this issue since the DA has clearly indisputably taken the position the taser is not a deadly weapon in this specific context.
A DA misspeaking or verbally misstating a law on the spot is not very relevant, especially compared to after reviewing the law and consulting with staff and legal texts before making a charging decision. (If a DA misspeaking once somehow actually changed the law we would all be in a heck of allot of trouble.)
Nope that is clearly not how the law works. Again if this is actually how things worked, there would be essentially no point in police ever using a taser instead of a gun, or at least police would be constantly facing attempting murder charges or at minimum assault related charges for the use of tasers. (For that matter any civilian ever using a taser for self defense would be treated to the same standard to its use as if they fired a gun, which would mean charges would be fired in a huge number of cases.)Here kiddos, I'll spoon feed it to you - By law in Georgia a "stun gun" is lumped in as a "firearm" https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-11/article-4/part-1/16-11-106/
Hence, it is considered a deadly weapon.
Nope that is clearly not how the law works. Again if this is actually how things worked, there would be essentially no point in police ever using a taser instead of a gun, or at least police would be constantly facing attempting murder charges or at minimum assault related charges for the use of tasers. (For that matter any civilian ever using a taser for self defense would be treated to the same standard to its use as if they fired a gun, which would mean charges would be fired in a huge number of cases.)
You can continue to wrongly mistake what the laws are in the this case, but that certainly does not change what is actually the law and at this point simply serves to personally make you look bad.
The law enforcment orginization page setup for donations for the two cops even lists:Here kiddos, I'll spoon feed it to you - By law in Georgia a "stun gun" is lumped in as a "firearm" https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-11/article-4/part-1/16-11-106/
Hence, it is considered a deadly weapon.
Next up is law that states when use of deadly force is permissable:
He meets all 4 criteria - and in reality he only has to meet 1.
He didn't misspeak moron. You have no basis to insinuate that in anyway - it just doesn't jive with your opinion so you just dismiss it as "Oh, it must have just been a mistake". There is simply no level of ignorance that is greater than what you just proposed for dismissing something that didn't agree with your opinion.
The FUCKING DA that is literally charging the cop with murder SPECIFICALLY said it's a deadly weapon.
DEEEEEEEEEERP. Do not pass go. Do not collect a guilty murder charge.
No PD in the country promotes tasers as deadly weapons. If they were they wouldn't need them.Do you know Georgia law?
Do you know any state laws on this? There is no universal law of what a deadly weapon is. You're clearly not a lawyer because you would understand how asinine your statement was.
You didn't refute shit.
You made the leap a firearm is a deadly weapon. Law does not state that. Not all firearms are deadly weapons. Paintball guns are firearms but not a deadly weapons.Here kiddos, I'll spoon feed it to you - By law in Georgia a "stun gun" is lumped in as a "firearm" https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-11/article-4/part-1/16-11-106/
Hence, it is considered a deadly weapon.
Next up is law that states when use of deadly force is permissable:
He meets all 4 criteria - and in reality he only has to meet 1.
He didn't misspeak moron. You have no basis to insinuate that in anyway - it just doesn't jive with your opinion so you just dismiss it as "Oh, it must have just been a mistake". There is simply no level of ignorance that is greater than what you just proposed for dismissing something that didn't agree with your opinion.
a) For the purposes of this Code section, the term "firearm" shall include stun guns and tasers.
I'll just leave this here.
Someone (and everyone else) seems to have skipped over this post.Another execution by the cops, this time a security guard in LA
'He Ran Because He Was Scared': LASD Deputies Shoot, Kill Auto Body Shop Security Guard In Gardena
This is the second fatal shooting involving a deputies with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department in two days.losangeles.cbslocal.com
Have you watched the video from the DA spelling each of the charges out? If so what are your thoughts?
The shooter fine charge him, the other officer WTF man.
What did he do wrong besides attempt to put handcuff's on the man and get his taser taken while he tried to tase.
So he is charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.... I thought tasers were not a dead weapon.. wait i thought it police were allowed to tackle or attempt to tase a suspect which is resisting arrest.
Do they honestly think the other office misbehaved?
Seriously... what the hell is up with the entire City.
My thoughts, Atlanta is a messed up city period.
The original police chief resigning is probably the smartest thing anyone could of done.
She is probably chilling at her house going thank god im not knee deep in this mess giving me acid reflux and stomach ulcers.
No wonder all the cops are leaving, and are most likely going to be sick on blue flu day.
They dug themselves there own graves, there is no adjacent police force that will back them up because they will get charged for even looking at a suspect wrong.
The city wants to defund and demoralize the police... well GG, you wont need to defund jack, most likely the police will be dissolved from no one being there.
Who is defending the bumb part. You cant shoot someone because they did something incredibly stupid.Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
B...b....but a taser is not a <insert weapon of mass destruction / firearm / insert other term>.
The end result is the same. If you do something fucking dumb infront of a cop, expect an equal or opposite reaction. Don't be fucking dumb. But for some reason morons are defending the dumb part...
But for some reason our average IQ is declining. Whodathunkit?
Who is defending the bumb part. You cant shoot someone because they did something incredibly stupid.
I'd like to see the digitally footage and see all the fact but from what I have seen so far the other cop should not be charged. We shall see once more evidence is presented. That charge relates to not providing immediate medical attention so probably going to have to hear what all the eye witnesses and the cops on testimony to determine get the full picture on that.The shooter fine charge him, the other officer WTF man.
What did he do wrong besides attempt to put handcuff's on the man and get his taser taken while he tried to tase.
So he is charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.... I thought tasers were not a dead weapon.. wait i thought it police were allowed to tackle or attempt to tase a suspect which is resisting arrest.
Do they honestly think the other office misbehaved?
Seriously... what the hell is up with the entire City.
My thoughts, Atlanta is a messed up city period.
The original police chief resigning is probably the smartest thing anyone could of done.
She is probably chilling at her house going thank god im not knee deep in this mess giving me acid reflux and stomach ulcers.
No wonder all the cops are leaving, and are most likely going to be sick on blue flu day.
They dug themselves there own graves, there is no adjacent police force that will back them up because they will get charged for even looking at a suspect wrong.
The city wants to defund and demoralize the police... well GG, you wont need to defund jack, most likely the police will be dissolved from no one being there.
I'd like to see the digitally footage and see all the fact but from what I have seen so far the other cop should not be charged. We shall see once more evidence is presented. That charge relates to not providing immediate medical attention so probably going to have to hear what all the eye witnesses and the cops on testimony to determine get the full picture on that.
Who are you quoting?"I agree the charges are excessive - though I'm simply too inept to outright admit it".
Yea, if there is reason to charge the second officer, it may be related to things he did or didn't do after the shooting.I'd like to see the digitally footage and see all the fact but from what I have seen so far the other cop should not be charged. We shall see once more evidence is presented. That charge relates to not providing immediate medical attention so probably going to have to hear what all the eye witnesses and the cops on testimony to determine get the full picture on that.
He brings up an interesting point but not a valid one. In that case the cops misused the taser and abusively attached the man. And he died.
A deadly weapon is any object capable of inflicting serious harm to another person. ... But even more common place objects such as a baseball bat, lamp, or even a pencil can qualify as a deadly weapon. Basically, any object used in a deadly manner can give rise to an assault with a deadly weapon charge.
In this case it aprears that the officer's life was not in jeopardy when he drew his weapon and shot the man dead.
Have you watched the video from the DA spelling each of the charges out? If so what are your thoughts?