Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Sadly, Blade II is not is good, and Blade III is barely watchable.
But yes, Blade I was most excellent.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Sadly, Blade II is not is good, and Blade III is barely watchable.
But yes, Blade I was most excellent.
Originally posted by: LordMaul
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Sadly, Blade II is not is good, and Blade III is barely watchable.
But yes, Blade I was most excellent.
Wow, one time where we rarely disagree. Personally, I wasn't all that amazed by Blade I (esp. with the exploding-pimple-man ending), and thought Blade II was better, with Blade III being the best.
Oh well, its ok, you can be wrong every once in a while.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: LordMaul
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Sadly, Blade II is not is good, and Blade III is barely watchable.
But yes, Blade I was most excellent.
Wow, one time where we rarely disagree. Personally, I wasn't all that amazed by Blade I (esp. with the exploding-pimple-man ending), and thought Blade II was better, with Blade III being the best.
Oh well, its ok, you can be wrong every once in a while.
To me, III spent too much time on other characters not enough on Snipes/Blade. He just didn't seem as fierce and unstoppable in III as in I. The comedy was pretty decent, it just seemed more like an episode of Buffy than Blade. And if you think about it the ending of III was kind of similar to I.
II also didn't have (in my opinion) as much cool fight choreography as I did, or as good of a story.
Action movies are definitely "to each their own" though, I really liked Equilibrium for the choreography and the Brave New World/1984 hybrid story, but a lot of people thought it was awful.
Originally posted by: LordMaul
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Sadly, Blade II is not is good, and Blade III is barely watchable.
But yes, Blade I was most excellent.
Wow, one time where we rarely disagree. Personally, I wasn't all that amazed by Blade I (esp. with the exploding-pimple-man ending), and thought Blade II was better, with Blade III being the best.
Oh well, its ok, you can be wrong every once in a while.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Sadly, Blade II is not is good, and Blade III is barely watchable.
But yes, Blade I was most excellent.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Sadly, Blade II is not is good, and Blade III is barely watchable.
But yes, Blade I was most excellent.
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
My man Snipes deserves a moment in the spotlight. He earned it moreso than in Murder at 1600.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
underworld was better
Originally posted by: BigB10293
All I could think of during Blade III is "Why is Van Wilder killing vampires?".
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
underworld was better
I loved Underworld, and the fact that Kate Beckinsale was in it just put it over the top for me.
Originally posted by: forcesho
Originally posted by: BigB10293
All I could think of during Blade III is "Why is Van Wilder killing vampires?".
me 2 ... i was watching the white castle movie and im like hey its van wilder again.. lol
I loved Underworld, and the fact that Kate Beckinsale was in it just put it over the top for me.