is unnecessarily redundant. That is all, finished.
You missed the comma after tone.It's actually necessarily redundant in some cases IMO.
Many tautological expressions serve to emphasize a point without use of inflection, tone or by written means.
You missed the comma after tone.
The last comma was not necessary as there was no ambiguity.
That's debatable. Different standards say different things about the comma being required or not.
That is why the military developed a special teaching regiment to train new soldiers.Most people are idiots and you have to repeat things many times. This fact is blatantly obvious.
General comma use should be for clarity and disambiguation, so as not to overuse commas unnecessarily (another tautology here lol), you can err on the side of skipping the commas.
You can argue that putting the comma in makes it mindless to read. You don't have to question whether its implied or not.
For technical writing, you're supposed to put the comma in, even though it may not be necessary, to remove any possibly ambiguities.
Sort of like cheap jew?
^ Disambiguation needed.:hmm: ^_^
It was implied... :sneaky:
And that's why making assumptions based on implications is bad. Therefore you should never used implied commas. I win.