BLM Dallas protest rally shooting

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
Oh, you were responding to my post which was a response to police shooting, right? Or did you get lost and confused?


Ok buddy - continue to be an apologist for your cause. It's really worked well for you the past 30 years. You can't stand statistics or facts that blacks are FAR more likely to kill someone than any other race.

Do you hear Asians, Indians, and other minority's complain and stop being productive members of society? Ask yourself why that is and your answer on the above will follow.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
The problem with shooting back, is it will do nothing but further militarize the police, and further put them into a mentality that all civilians are the enemy.

Although all the gun nuts should be busting a nut over this, since they claim the 2nd amendment is to fight back against a tyrannical government. Looks like some people take that talking point too seriously.

I think cops shoot way too many people, and those responsible should be severely punished. But killing police officers that have nothing to do with the incidents in question, is completely senseless, counterproductive and in no way provides justice.

This was always the illogic I saw with the 2A (and the public ownership of offensive weapons.)

Fighting back against a perceived "tyrannical govt" would always involve individual or small groups of civilians shooting either cops or military personnel.

The Bundy ranch and Oregon standoff can be seen the same way. They came to a conclusion the govt was oppressive and used guns and self-interpreted constitutional rights to fight back.

Yet it takes seeing a bunch of madmen pointing guns and shooting at LEOs to realise the horror and stupidity of this position.



(Who knows what the actual motive of Dallas was ATM, but the potential exists regardless of actual motive.
 

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
Ok buddy - continue to be an apologist for your cause. It's really worked well for you the past 30 years. You can't stand statistics or facts that blacks are FAR more likely to kill someone than any other race.

Do you hear Asians, Indians, and other minority's complain and stop being productive members of society? Ask yourself why that is and your answer on the above will follow.
No, buddy, I'm agreeing with you. Blacks are 5x deadlier than white people. How about we educate police on this, ok?

Tell them that there are five times more white people than black people, yet black people murder just as much as white people.

Every time they do a traffic stop, if the person is black, they are five times more likely to die than if the person was white. Therefore the police must be five times more prepared to shoot in all instances.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
No, buddy, I'm agreeing with you. Blacks are 5x deadlier than white people. How about we educate police on this, ok?

Tell them that there are five times more white people than black people, yet black people murder just as much as white people.

Every time they do a traffic stop, if the person is black, they are five times more likely to die than if the person was white. Therefore the police must be five times more prepared to shoot in all instances.

Ugh taking about Fathers, Mothers, Childrens lives like a statistic = fail
How about we talk about appropriate funding for Police, appropriate spending for Police, appropriate community outreach for Police.
 

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
Ugh taking about Fathers, Mothers, Childrens lives like a statistic = fail
How about we talk about appropriate funding for Police, appropriate spending for Police, appropriate community outreach for Police.
No, no, no, Zstream is onto something here. It's all in the data. Just look at it for yourself. Stop being ignorant, as Zstream likes to say.
 

MrA79

Member
Aug 11, 2012
199
1
76
No, buddy, I'm agreeing with you. Blacks are 5x deadlier than white people. How about we educate police on this, ok?

Tell them that there are five times more white people than black people, yet black people murder just as much as white people.

Every time they do a traffic stop, if the person is black, they are five times more likely to die than if the person was white. Therefore the police must be five times more prepared to shoot in all instances.

Patronizing behavior towards people you don't agree with is rather unbecoming of an AT mod\employee, whichever you are.

You may not comment on a mod's status when they are posting on their regular account.

Perknose
Forum Director
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,443
9,343
136
Patronizing behavior towards people you don't agree with is rather unbecoming of an AT mod\employee, whichever you are.
Just FYI it's considered bad form to call out a mod when they are posting as a member.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,443
9,343
136
Ok buddy - continue to be an apologist for your cause. It's really worked well for you the past 30 years. You can't stand statistics or facts that blacks are FAR more likely to kill someone than any other race.

Do you hear Asians, Indians, and other minority's complain and stop being productive members of society? Ask yourself why that is and your answer on the above will follow.
So do you have some sort of solution to this?

Maybe a post penultimate solution?
 

MrA79

Member
Aug 11, 2012
199
1
76
Just FYI it's considered bad form to call out a mod when they are posting as a member.

Apologies if so. As my post count might indicate, I am probably not intimately familiar with the unwritten laws of etiquette here.
 

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
Patronizing behavior towards people you don't agree with is rather unbecoming of an AT mod\employee, whichever you are.
How is it patronizing? He served up the statistics himself and I'm simply following his own line of logic.
 

Knowing

Golden Member
Mar 18, 2014
1,522
13
46
This was always the illogic I saw with the 2A (and the public ownership of offensive weapons.)

Fighting back against a perceived "tyrannical govt" would always involve individual or small groups of civilians shooting either cops or military personnel.

The Bundy ranch and Oregon standoff can be seen the same way. They came to a conclusion the govt was oppressive and used guns and self-interpreted constitutional rights to fight back.

Yet it takes seeing a bunch of madmen pointing guns and shooting at LEOs to realise the horror and stupidity of this position.

(Who knows what the actual motive of Dallas was ATM, but the potential exists regardless of actual motive.


“Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world.” - Abraham Lincoln
 

MrA79

Member
Aug 11, 2012
199
1
76
“Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world.” - Abraham Lincoln

Said while actively and violently fighting against a collective that was following that principle.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,129
30,523
136
I hope it was terrorists and not BLM extremists. Just saying.

Don't see why terrorists would target police as they usually just want as big a death count as possible, but I guess we can't rule it out.

I'll say this, whenever there is a terrorist attack, people say Muslims should call out and stop their own extremists because otherwise they are just enabling them. Well the same should be true for cops, then. Start calling out your "bad apples." Police unions keep protecting the thugs in blue and incidents like this will happen more often.

As someone said, this is why we have the 2A, right? So we can fight back against government tyranny? I bet the shooters feel they were fighting government tyranny. If you are going to go vigilante though, you should at least try to target people that have committed actual offenses. The officers killed and hurt were probably good people.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
This is what you get when you are perceived as ignoring peoples concerns.

I'm really not understanding the surprise or outrage in this thread.

This is why you have guns in the US isn't it? To fight back against a repressive government. Well that's what a significant amount of people in the US think that you have.

There's huge amount of rhetoric from all sides that your establishment are illegitimate and overbearing. You don't get to walk away from that just because the guy that acted on that shot someone from "your side".

How about you all wind the rhetoric back a bit, realise that the whole "but guns are the answer!" comes with consequences and start listening to the people and their concerns.

This is exactly right. Violence as a solution to "oppression" is part of the American mythos.

Your "good guy with a gun stopping a bad guy with a gun" is highly dependent on your perception of who the good guys and bad guys are.


As it's subjective, the answer is never black and white.
Sad.
 

CLite

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2005
1,726
7
76
There is a pretty good video of an interview of the former "suspect" and his brother after coming out of the police station. They are obviously both emotionally frazzled, but the brother is quite a good speaker.

They received a call from family saying they were on the Dallas twitter as a prime suspect, they instantly went to find a Police Officer to hand in their AR-15. There is another video of them handing in the gun, and the cop was pretty chill the whole time. They later got pulled into the interrogation room, asked if they like killing cops, and told there was video and eye witness evidence of them shooting police (there was not). They are unnerved since they are still getting streamed death threats and the police won't exonerate them until after the formal investigation is concluded.

The brother speaks about how BLM is about showing to the world the humanity of the victims of injustice. My uneducated guess is that the individuals whom carried this out hate both what BLM stands for and the police and were trying to incite something even worse than the immediate death and destruction they wrought onto the police and their families. I hope that the victims' families can find peace, that justice is swiftly found for them, and that whatever the perpetrators were hoping to accomplish in the long-term does not come to pass.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
Don't see why terrorists would target police as they usually just want as big a death count as possible, but I guess we can't rule it out.

I'll say this, whenever there is a terrorist attack, people say Muslims should call out and stop their own extremists because otherwise they are just enabling them. Well the same should be true for cops, then. Start calling out your "bad apples." Police unions keep protecting the thugs in blue and incidents like this will happen more often.

As someone said, this is why we have the 2A, right? So we can fight back against government tyranny? I bet the shooters feel they were fighting government tyranny. If you are going to go vigilante though, you should at least try to target people that have committed actual offenses. The officers killed and hurt were probably good people.

Just heard a brief new conference with the Police chief. The guy they have said he hates cops, white people and especially white cops. They won't rule out anything at this time but to me this sounds like anarchist/racist remarks.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,161
136
I MUST bring Donald Trump into this because Trump adds to this atmosphere of hate.
And this week, today, we have the black community and law enforcement both as victims.
Just imagine the intensity for hate if Donald Trump were allowed to be president.
The formula is simple.
Just add into this mix the hispanic community and the Muslim community.
Probably not involving law enforcement so much, but the lone wolf of hate.
I expect the Dallas shootings were planned by the lone wolf(s) of hate targeting law enforcement.
If Donald Trump were president, with his twisted insane viewpoint of the world, and his encouragement for hate, we would see an great increase of the lone wolf targeting hispanics assuming all were illegal, and targeting anyone appearing as Muslim because the lone wolf would assume they were radical Islamic terrorist.

I can not imagine the hate that would erupt if someone as Donald Trump were president.
And while the reactions and leadership from president Obama after such tragedies can appear a bit lacking, too scripted, a president Donald Trump as leader would not even feel the need to try.
All a president Donald Trump would do is to add to the confusion, further the hate and further the division one against another.

Trump may be fun and funny and interesting and amusing and cakrasimatic as an individual, however running a country is an entirely different matter. And never a game.
A leader must have his or her feet firmly planted on the ground and capable as a leader.
Otherwise, the result would be utter national chaos.
Under someone as Donald Trump, tragedy as this could easily become a weekly occurrence.
And the nation at war with itself. Race against race. Neighbor against neighbor. Religion against religion.
And law enforcement caught in the middle.

What has happened in the last week has been extremely ugly for America.
And under the wrong leadership, the ugliness could and would become much worse.
And Donald Trump would no longer seem that fun nor funny.
.
.
.
 
Last edited:

MrA79

Member
Aug 11, 2012
199
1
76
Just heard a brief new conference with the Police chief. The guy they have said he hates cops, white people and especially white cops. They won't rule out anything at this time but to me this sounds like anarchist/racist remarks.

Per the DOJ, racism\hate crime laws don't apply to minorities. This was clearly a case of disenfranchisement and anger at white privilege.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
I hope it was terrorists and not BLM extremists. Just saying.

Well obama won't say it but it was BLM terrorists. One of the suspects said he wanted to kill white people and kill white police officers. Of course this will never be called a hate crime. I just hope under obamas gun control plan he lists BLM members as terrorists and removes their right to purchase firearms.

Fuck violent leftists.
 

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
Well obama won't say it but it was BLM terrorists. One of the suspects said he wanted to kill white people and kill white police officers. Of course this will never be called a hate crime. I just hope under obamas gun control plan he lists BLM members as terrorists and removes their right to purchase firearms.

Fuck violent leftists.

I agree. The world will be a better place when all those BLM protestors are labeled as terrorists. The peaceful protesting by the BLM in Dallas and other cities is simply a cover for a terrorist organization. All of them need to go.

All of them.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,669
266
126
By your reasoning, it would be the next logical step for people to start shooting Muslims.

I don't imagine many are surprised by this? Seems like the next logical step.

There is only so much crap, real or perceived, that people will take before they begin to fight back in whatever way they feel best.

My heart goes out to the families of the murdered officers.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |