buckshot24
Diamond Member
- Nov 3, 2009
- 9,916
- 85
- 91
Is acting white not shooting cops at a disproportionate rate?STFU and read that thread.
Is acting white not shooting cops at a disproportionate rate?STFU and read that thread.
Cop was just shot in St. Louis
Holy shit
http://fox2now.com/2016/07/08/report-officer-shot-in-ballwin-manhunt-underway/
He shot a cop during a traffic stop. Dude is black.
This is not gonna go over well.
Is acting white not shooting cops at a disproportionate rate?
If you're not being sarcastic this is very ironic.lets not jump to conclusions. Lets wait for the evidence. This could of just been any other random cop killing.
I guess you are equating the US to a 2nd or 3rd world shit hole.
Let's look at the modern 1st world countries shall we? How are their murder rates? How often do cops in those countries kill civilians? How often do civilians kill cops?
This bullshit that happens in the US regarding police and civilians is fairly contained to the US when it comes to the first world countries.
I'm just asking since you won't tell us what acting white means.air tight argument right here.
I'm just asking since you won't tell us what acting white means.
God, you're a blathering idiot.
Let see.
Poverty.
Corruption.
*Would have*You asked? No you wanted to argue a straw man. Debate class would of been good for you.
Your first link reads like a nutter site. But if this is one of your go to sites it would help explain some of your posting here.
*Would have*
What does acting white mean? How do you do it?
Please spell out the problem and your solution to it.Glad that you mention Australia. See the true cause of shootings yet? Or shall I spell it out for you so you won't pull out the knee jerk clueless ignorant reaction of let ban gun so we will get peace next time.
So what are you arguing exactly?
That america has the same corruption as brazil and mexico?
You fucking kookoo.
Please spell out the problem and your solution to it.
Only if your reading skill is as strong as your quick knee jerk reaction of "let ban guns so we can have peace".
You mentioned Australia and I just told you why gun ban work there/the true cause(s) of gun violence.
And I also provided cases about 1st world countries that ban guns but still no peace.
Ok, let compare 1st world countries.
How about France? Guns are restrictive yet no peace from guns.
How about Belgium? Same.
Yes, let ban guns => peace per some of you.
Funny how Swiss does not have restriction on guns as the neighbors yet they don't have gun problems as them.
So... just another hateful nut case with a gun, right?
Seems to be a universal right in this country given that they come in all different colors & ideological flavors.
The root causes of crime are lack of education and lack of employment.
And few presidents have done much work to solve these problems.
Lets ask Australia, shall we?
Those things are illegal. Imagine what 80 years of illegal guns would do to our violence levels.
Good then that you agree that the second amendment should open all law abiding citizens to all weapons without limitation. I wouldn't be opposed to the American public securing a few nuclear devices either since that would be checkmate for any potential tyrannical government. As we've seen throughout history simply the possession of such a device can avoid much unneeded bloodshed.
In how far are "non-lethal means" important when you deal with a shooter where you know he already killed 5?
I am no expert by any means, but the main goal sure was to "take out" that guy, no matter how, and in the fastest and most effective way possible. Killing him with a bomb at first sounded "odd" to me too, but at second glance not so much.