Can we also say it destroys the gun free zone BS and the if only there was a good guy with a gun it would be over quick arguments too?
So the guy was ex-military and used an SKS rifle. Talk about destroying the magazine limit laws prevent killings.
Can we also say it destroys the gun free zone BS and the if only there was a good guy with a gun it would be over quick arguments too?
I am anti-gun but I have to disagree with your logic. The argument wasn't that nobody would be killed but that fewer would get killed. If nobody (including the cops) had guns, I am sure the body count could have been much higher.
Can we also say it destroys the gun free zone BS and the if only there was a good guy with a gun it would be over quick arguments too?
Sure and let's get rid of the first amendment while we're at it huh! FN idiot! Come and try to take my guns and see what happens. You won't though because you're just some coward behind a keyboard. You want your elected officials to do your dirty work for you. Do you want to see real bloodshed here? Try taking our second amendment away.
If you want to live in a country without a second amendment there's many in the world to suit your Fd up needs. Get the F out.
There was some discussion earlier in the thread speculating on what kind of weapon was used in Dallas.
Turns out it is an SKS (image below).
It has a non removable magazine that holds 10 7.62x39 mm rounds, slightly less punchy than the .308 which is 7.62x51. Anyway, these kinds of rounds are meant to kill, not wound like the AR-15's .223 / 5.56
This technically is not an assault rifle. It's just a rifle.
The scenario argument for guns is this:
If the Dallas shooter had picked a theater, would you rather be able to shoot back, or sit there helpless? Imagine if the Orlando shooter had been put down in the first minute. There are situations where an armed population makes for much better outcomes.
I dont give a fuck if a PD has any in their inventory or not, that is their deal. And you can use them in non-enclosed spaces by making 40mm grenades filled with the gas, and then firing them from a grenade launcher within 10 feet or so of the shooter. And while a parking garage is not a fully enclosed space, it isnt a fully open space either. Any gas cloud is unlikely to instantly disperse.
No, I was agreeing with someone who was responding to someone who said something along the lines that "why did they blow up an explosive instead of disarming it", when blowing up IEDs remotely is a common occurrence, since cutting wires means a human who is next to a bomb for a notable length of time, and more time means more exposure. Disarming them, or blowing them up, is all fine with me, whatever is most appropriate for the situation. And the video I was mentioning, and linked for you, was just how they dealt with one particular IED. Basically I was saying, that just blowing up an IED, instead of taking the time and risk to disarm it, isnt necessarily a bad thing on its own.
I assume its driving while black.
First time anyone has asked me to compare bodies on the internet. :wub:
oh and dont think about my body when you sex your wife. It will be weird
You're clueless about the SK. Just open Mag and drop ten rounds in. It's faster then using stripper clip which usually binds up.so he had to insert bullets into the rifle 1 at a time?
snip
non-removable clip?
so he had to insert bullets into the rifle 1 at a time?
imagine how many could have been hurt if it was an ar-15, 30round mag (ie: removable).
btw- how many shots did he fire from this WWII rifle?
and the only people he hit in a crowd of thousands were cops?!
damn accurate!
um.. how far away was he?
non-removable clip?
so he had to insert bullets into the rifle 1 at a time?
imagine how many could have been hurt if it was an ar-15, 30round mag (ie: removable).
btw- how many shots did he fire from this WWII rifle?
and the only people he hit in a crowd of thousands were cops?!
damn accurate!
um.. how far away was he?
I'm thinking if it was modified, the media would be all over it.
He was specifically targeting cops and white people, from his own words.
Unless it was modified, just 10 rounds.
However, this gun can be loaded using a 'clip' as opposed to pre-loading a magazine. It only takes a few seconds to reload it if you use a clip.
No pictures, just police sources.
Anyway, clip or mag doesn't really matter.
This is how long it takes to reload the 10 rounds on an unmodified SKS using a clip. About 6.5s total in this gif :
“It’s like we got a target on our back even if we innocent, it hurts. You don’t even want to walk outside your house no more. But to all the young black men and young black women out there, all black people do something positive.”
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016...lice-forced-shoot-armed-black-man-waving-gun/
Yet another case of idiots using youtube to destroy cops.
She says, “The man did not do nothing y’all.
Gawd. Apparently it does matter or modern military firearms wouldn't use drop magazines.
That article is full of ignorance and idiots. It appears to be a good shoot, claiming the cops just drove up and shot him appears to be the furthest thing from the truth. I am sure we will find out more facts from it. Once again though, white male shot and killed by police without a gun barely a week ago doesn't get all the press and hate this gets where someone had a gun and pointed it at an officer.
Yet they are far more likely to die by someone who looks just like them rather than police. The target they are claiming that is on their back, is put there by themselves.
non-removable clip?
so he had to insert bullets into the rifle 1 at a time?
imagine how many could have been hurt if it was an ar-15, 30round mag (ie: removable).
btw- how many shots did he fire from this WWII rifle?
and the only people he hit in a crowd of thousands were cops?!
damn accurate!
um.. how far away was he?