By what?
The world doesn't owe me jack fucking shit. if something "triggered" me, I wouldn't get on the internet and cry about it.
Triggered?
He's pretty much correct though. Except for the option to "upgrade" from direct impingement action to piston and some evolutionary changes (rail systems, free floating barrels, etc.) the designs you mentioned aren't THAT much different. The only truly 'modern' rifle design you can likely point to would be the H&K G11 cartridgeless ammunition system and that never even made it into production.
Definitely triggeredBy what?
The world doesn't owe me jack fucking shit. if something "triggered" me, I wouldn't get on the internet and cry about it.
Meh, the AR is the Honda Civic of weapons, I'd argue all the others are better. Have owned several on that list over the years.
Yes, but to keep up the car comparison today's Civic isn't completely indistinguishable from 60s era Civic, just as the rifles you mentioned aren't that much different than the original mk 1 version of the AR15. There hasn't been an equivalent major technology or design change to rifles akin to hybrid engines and regenerative braking for Civics (and other models).
Triggered?
Yeah, it's so easy to trigger the cucks, as evidenced by Painman and LK.
Definitely triggered
He's pretty much correct though. Except for the option to "upgrade" from direct impingement action to piston and some evolutionary changes (rail systems, free floating barrels, etc.) the designs you mentioned aren't THAT much different. The only truly 'modern' rifle design you can likely point to would be the H&K G11 cartridgeless ammunition system and that never even made it into production.
glenn1 & mongrel, have either of you used a modern bullpup?
I find the design a significant improvement, and I suggest if either of you consider the AR "state of the art" you're behind by nearly 60 years.
glenn1 & mongrel, have either of you used a modern bullpup?
I find the design a significant improvement, and I suggest if either of you consider the AR "state of the art" you're behind by nearly 60 years.
Definitely triggered
Noooooo... you're again assuming everyone thinks like you do - that's called "projection".
Only the regressive super-lefts behave as you do. No one else gets "triggered" and needs "safe spaces"... and the "cucks" are most definitely in your camp loudly proclaiming their own masculinity is "toxic", etc, etc, etc.
So, no. The only folks "triggered" around here are you folks screaming your heads off and repeating the doctrines of progressivism over and over again, and calling anyone who disagrees "evil".
WORSE, you're doing the same thing as BLM at the candlelight vigil for the gay club shootout - hijacking an event to push your narratives and get your doctrines signed into law.
I think I would personally rather have a
the dead cops weren't wearing bullet proof vests?
or were they not enuf protection vs a wwII rifle?
or headshot?
cool story bro
Most vests are designed to stop pistol rounds. Those that will stop rifle rounds are very bulky, generally not police issue-
http://www.safeguardarmor.com/support/body-armor-protection-levels/
Even the best are probably ineffective against a heavier hunting round like a 338 Winchester magnum.
thx. so im assuming dallas cops doesn't wear lvl III body armor?
no idea how much power a 338 Winchester magnum round does but lvl III stops .308/7.62 aka M14 assault rifles that was US Army standard in 1960s b4 the M16 (aka ar-15).
woah.. lvl III also stop 30-06?
Klondike Bar?
I had a Steyr Aug, only thing I didn't like was the optics.
Am hearing it may not have been an SKS used in Dallas, not going to post what I read, the official stuff will be out soon.