So he tells the cop he is licensed to carry and then says he is getting his wallet and the cop just shoots him through the window....with his kid in the backseat.
Meanwhile, White Nationalists in Georgia can reach for their holsters in heated arguments and the Police stand there and try to calm things down. You can go on Youtube and find plenty of videos of white people disobeying Police orders, some of them have weapons, and the first thing that comes out are tasers and pleas to drop weapons and get down on the ground. But yall want to tell me how to feel about it.
What a time to be alive. Whats going to happen next is white folks are going to try and find some dirt on this guy so they can call him a thug and say it was a good shoot.
So he tells the cop he is licensed to carry and then says he is getting his wallet and the cop just shoots him through the window....with his kid in the backseat.
Meanwhile, White Nationalists in Georgia can reach for their holsters in heated arguments and the Police stand there and try to calm things down. You can go on Youtube and find plenty of videos of white people disobeying Police orders, some of them have weapons, and the first thing that comes out are tasers and pleas to drop weapons and get down on the ground. But yall want to tell me how to feel about it.
What a time to be alive. Whats going to happen next is white folks are going to try and find some dirt on this guy so they can call him a thug and say it was a good shoot.
I'm glad you already know all you need to know to make a decision and stick with it.
Hopefully, the rest of us will wait a few days at least, until accurate info is released, before attacking groups of people over what happened.
I'm glad you already know all you need to know to make a decision and stick with it.
Hopefully, the rest of us will wait a few days at least, until accurate info is released, before attacking groups of people over what happened.
Are you nuts? You need the police spin to know the truth? ITS ON FUCKING FILM FOR GODS SAKE!
Just saw some of it on the news. I have a problem with a broken tail light stop ending up with a shooting.
I will say I believe there is more to this than it appears, maybe he didn't communicate well about his legal gun but I do agree black guys are definitely under more obligation when they carry a gun and that's not right if you support open carry.
Love how the cop is just nervous shouting the F word and screaming and making all that noise.
You ask a guy for his ID, he goes to get it...and you kill him.
Then you detain his girlfriend in handcuffs and put the kid in the backseat of the cop car with her.
God Bless America.
Open carry, concealed carry, any carry is only for real Americans.
Are you nuts? You need the police spin to know the truth? ITS ON FUCKING FILM FOR GODS SAKE!
Legally carrying doesn't count for black people.
rest of history of racist gun control at linkThe historical record provides compelling evidence that racism underlies gun control laws -- and not in any subtle way. Throughout much of American history, gun control was openly stated as a method for keeping blacks and Hispanics "in their place," and to quiet the racial fears of whites. This paper is intended to provide a brief summary of this unholy alliance of gun control and racism, and to suggest that gun control laws should be regarded as "suspect ideas," analogous to the "suspect classifications" theory of discrimination already part of the American legal system.
Racist arms laws predate the establishment of the United States. Starting in 1751, the French Black Code required Louisiana colonists to stop any blacks, and if necessary, beat "any black carrying any potential weapon, such as a cane." If a black refused to stop on demand, and was on horseback, the colonist was authorized to "shoot to kill." [1] Slave possession of firearms was a necessity at times in a frontier society, yet laws continued to be passed in an attempt to prohibit slaves or free blacks from possessing firearms, except under very restrictively controlled conditions. [2] Similarly, in the sixteenth century the colony of New Spain, terrified of black slave revolts, prohibited all blacks, free and slave, from carrying arms. [3]
In the Haitian Revolution of the 1790s, the slave population successfully threw off their French masters, but the Revolution degenerated into a race war, aggravating existing fears in the French Louisiana colony, and among whites in the slave states of the United States. When the first U. S. official arrived in New Orleans in 1803 to take charge of this new American possession, the planters sought to have the existing free black militia disarmed, and otherwise exclude "free blacks from positions in which they were required to bear arms," including such non-military functions as slave-catching crews. The New Orleans city government also stopped whites from teaching fencing to free blacks, and then, when free blacks sought to teach fencing, similarly prohibited their efforts as well. [4]
It is not surprising that the first North American English colonies, then the states of the new republic, remained in dread fear of armed blacks, for slave revolts against slave owners often degenerated into less selective forms of racial warfare. The perception that free blacks were sympathetic to the plight of their enslaved brothers, and the dangerous example that "a Negro could be free" also caused the slave states to pass laws designed to disarm all blacks, both slave and free. Unlike the gun control laws passed after the Civil War, these antebellum statutes were for blacks alone. In Maryland, these prohibitions went so far as to prohibit free blacks from owning dogs without a license, and authorizing any white to kill an unlicensed dog owned by a free black, for fear that blacks would use dogs as weapons. Mississippi went further, and prohibited any ownership of a dog by a black person. [5]
Your thread title is incorrect. Falcon Heights doesn't have police, they pay Roseville for that. A Roseville officer fatally shot the guy. I'm just messing with you and don't really care about the title. But FYI.
As far as the point of the post, I haven't seen the video but also believe it didn't get started until after the shooting. Please tell me if I'm wrong and I'll find a way to watch it.
I find it hard to believe someone with a wife and kid in their car would want to shoot an officer who pulled them over for a traffic stop, and I also find it hard to believe that in that area of town in 2016 an officer would be itching for an opportunity to shoot someone. I'd guess it was a brief moment of fear, reaction and probably error on the cop's part but it's nothing more than my guess. I wasn't there and I don't have any evidence whatsoever.
The occifer is just doing his part to make sure the widow gets on welfare. Gotta increase those democrat voter rolls somehow.
The occifer is just doing his part to make sure the widow gets on welfare. Gotta increase those democrat voter rolls somehow.