BMW Driver Blocks Hydrant.....7 Alarm Fire Breaks Out

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126


im surprised that with the kink in the hose thre was enough pressure. They had 3 choices for ports, the front and two ports to connect the hose. why not use one of the side ports?

“You can’t really bend a charged 4-inch feed line. Straight and a slight bend is about as good as you can do. And they will never park in front of a hydrant again. Water is everything at a fire and you need it ASAP.”

look at the pic, that statement is a lie.
 
Last edited:

drinkmorejava

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
3,567
7
81
Those are intake ports for boosting flow, they aren't for output.

Edit: To better explain, pumps are hooked up to either of the "splitter". This boosts pressure above normal hydrant levels, allowing water to reach higher heights and longer distances.

Thank you
 

Tommy2000GT

Golden Member
Jun 19, 2000
1,832
3
81
What a dick move by the firemen. They could have used another connection on the outlet to ease the bend.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,578
146
...the article says they couldn't bend a 4" line, but that's exactly what they did trying to get it though the car. It would have been 10 times less bent if they used the side port and went around the car.

Looks a lot more like they were trying to ruin the guys day than fix the problem in the most expeditious and reliable manner.

who cares?
 

BrayD

Member
Oct 12, 2012
32
0
0
What a dick move by the firemen. They could have used another connection on the outlet to ease the bend.

No, the dick move was the BMW owner who parked in front of a hydrant. A lot of you are seeming to forget, had he not broken the law, he wouldn't have brought this upon himself.

It truly is a shame that people are blaming the Firemen who arrived to save lives and try to prevent people from losing their homes. Have we, as a nation, really turned to blaming those who are in the right and refuse to put blame on the offender? I guess to some people, a car is worth more than a house and people's safety.
 
Last edited:

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,573
5,096
136
we are talking about the 3 ports on the actual hydrant, not the silver shiny thing the FD put on.


Let's try this again. The front port is a 4" port, the side ports are 2.5" ports. You'll never flow enough water out of the side ports to match the main front port's flow rate. Here, maybe a picture will help.....

 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,578
146
ITT: lots of BMW drivers who have parked in front of fire hydrants when a fire broke out.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
63,440
11,767
136
While I don't have a problem with them doing it, I'm surprised they didn't just hook up to the car and tow it out of the way with one of the trucks. It would have actually made more sense. That would have cleared a nice path to the hydrant and allowed a better run for the hose. As it is, it still has a decent kink in the hose.
 

Stopsignhank

Platinum Member
Mar 1, 2014
2,339
1,534
136
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...-fire-scene/U6jeEBScIhlW3YutCLPS8L/story.html

At the fire scene, MacDonald said, firefighters noticed that the way the hose was snaked through the car created a major kink, slowing down the volume of water flowing to fight the fire that eventually displaced an estimated 30 people.


A small platoon of firefighters circled the two-door, lifted it slightly and moved it about a foot away from where the driver had originally parked it, MacDonald said.



“I’ve seen that done many times,’’ MacDonald said of the “lift and slide” maneuver firefighters used. “It was a small car, and you get a bunch of firefighters there with one purpose. … They slide it over a little bit and the water obviously flowed a lot better.’’

Gotta love it!
 

Tommy2000GT

Golden Member
Jun 19, 2000
1,832
3
81
Let's try this again. The front port is a 4" port, the side ports are 2.5" ports. You'll never flow enough water out of the side ports to match the main front port's flow rate. Here, maybe a picture will help.....


Look at this image again. The silver thing is connected to the front outlet of the hydrant. But they could have used the side connection on the silver thing which is as big as the connection that yellow hose is on.

 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
92
91
Look at this image again. The silver thing is connected to the front outlet of the hydrant. But they could have used the side connection on the silver thing which is as big as the connection that yellow hose is on.


Holy crap, that's been answered multiple times. The shiny splitter has two intakes and one outlet.

ONCE AND FOR ALL:
1) The hydrant has a single 4" port. The sides couldn't have been used. Stop suggesting it.
2) The shiny metal splitter added by the FD has two intakes for boosting pressure and one outlet (See BrayD). The sides couldn't have been used. Stop suggesting it.
 
Last edited:

BrayD

Member
Oct 12, 2012
32
0
0
Look at this image again. The silver thing is connected to the front outlet of the hydrant. But they could have used the side connection on the silver thing which is as big as the connection that yellow hose is on.

Wow, are people even reading this thread? A reason is given why the side ports on the hydrant aren't used, and a person asks about the "splitter" thingy. Then an answer is given why the "splitter" thingy isn't used and people ask about the hydrant again. The answer is given and, again, people ask about the "splitter" thingy. Over and over.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
92
91
I think they should have plowed over the car with a firetruck. It probably would have taken less time than fooling with it and the hydrant would have been clear. I'd definitely find no fault with the FD for doing something like that.
 

Tommy2000GT

Golden Member
Jun 19, 2000
1,832
3
81
Holy crap, that's been answered multiple times. The shiny splitter has two intakes and one outlet.

ONCE AND FOR ALL:
1) The hydrant has a single 4" port. The sides couldn't have been used. Stop suggesting it.
2) The shiny metal splitter added by the FD has two intakes for boosting pressure and one outlet (See BrayD). The sides couldn't have been used. Stop suggesting it.

ok but it was still a dick move by the fireman
 

Stopsignhank

Platinum Member
Mar 1, 2014
2,339
1,534
136
I think it is great it is getting all this attention. It may stop others from parking in front of hydrants. I know the douchebag who drove that car won't do it again.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
92
91
ok but it was still a dick move by the fireman

That makes no sense. They needed water and there was only 1 outlet. The car was in front of it. Therefore, the car needed to be dealt with in the only way possible. It wasn't a dick move; it was the only move.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,414
1,574
126
While I don't have a problem with them doing it, I'm surprised they didn't just hook up to the car and tow it out of the way with one of the trucks. It would have actually made more sense. That would have cleared a nice path to the hydrant and allowed a better run for the hose. As it is, it still has a decent kink in the hose.

NOT SURE IF SERIOUS

They're trying to FIGHT A FUCKING FIRE and you want them to call a tow truck?

mind=blown

this thread is completely bananas.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,227
36
91
If the firefighters tried to be nice and go around your car, and someone died in the fire because they took too long...your car insurance won't even come close to covering the civil and possibly criminal liability you are exposed to.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |