boeing '60s stealth tech

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ALIVE

Golden Member
May 21, 2012
1,960
0
0
You know what? You are right. At first the conversation was about an article talking about an old airplane. Then you changed it to the topic of russian radar. Then it was about nuclear war and american ego. Then it was about laser proof missles which will be developed in the future. And finally, hot coffee, top gear, and a spider. Nobody should reply, because they can't debug all that.

the topic was a stealth plane
and radar is on topic
because if a radar can detect a plane then it is not stealth right???
so how talking about radar is out of topic

as for laser all the others
who derailed the topic other posters
 

ALIVE

Golden Member
May 21, 2012
1,960
0
0
Butthurt Russian(? or other East European) with mental illness(es) or traumatic brain injury.

war in Yugoslavia
while usa entered 5 km after the surrender of the serbians due to the minefields
form the thin air a division of russian appears in their capitol

the superior usa with all the satellite did not detect a whole division moving and heard it on the news of its arrival anyway in the same war they destroyed the chinese embassy because their intelligence told them it was not there
so yes usa is superior and russians are but hurt

georgia war
while usa had deployed cia and military agents inside the country for black ops against the neighbor russia it was soon clear that somethign would happen in the area

while usa and president bush was talkign on tv about usa army rapid deployment capabilities less than 24h and the dispach of an air carrier to the area to assist the georgian

the russians without usa detecting the concentration of the troops
made a rapid move from all the frontier eliminating the georgia army machine in hours

of course the rapid deployment of americans never happened did not have the time to do it
and then the fun begin
bush to putin
we sent the air carrier for humanitarian reason in the area you need to let it dock (in the port you already control)
putin to bush
you are wellcome to come and help with humanitarian after all the russian troops are here for humanitarian reasons also
bush to putin
usa will not permit any georgia soil to be lost
putin to bush
of course russia will not permit any georgia soil to be lost georgia soil is for georgian

next day russian assimilated 2/3 of the country
declaring that they brought russian soil under russian rule
soil that was never georgian

bush said nothing and call the air carrier back

another but hurt moment for the russians yes

when the recent history is a disgrace for your military and political leadership going from 1 defeat to another you are the one with mental issues

live in your fantasy propaganda world
 

ALIVE

Golden Member
May 21, 2012
1,960
0
0
This post brought to you by the Putin's Office of Internet Trolls (tm)

It's always cool to see the odds and ends of technology, especially in way you don't expect.

and this comes from someone that actually does not like russia

like them or not has nothing to do with reality
2 times they humiliate your army forces
by the way putin was nice and after arresting your army and cia personal in georgia gift raped them and give it to usa

but this is a long tradition of russian arresting military units
and then freeing them to usa bu without their equipment

ww2 america send a bomber squadron in the east so they can bomb germany also from that direction
the beloved uncle Stalin that was the propaganda in the times decided to relief americans from their strategic bombers since russian had no one and america had then in 4 years they copied the design and they start producing them with a different name

well the american crew must be grateful that stalin release them and did not kill them

do they teach you this in your history lessons or is to painful to be touched???

thats why american are the laughing idiots of the rest world
they have stopped thinking
anything that goes we are the best we do only right
is immediately received as propaganda and lies

live in a fantasy world it does not matter
there are thinking people
and there are americans lol :biggrin:
 

skimple

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2005
1,283
3
81
and this comes from someone that actually does not like russia

like them or not has nothing to do with reality
2 times they humiliate your army forces
by the way putin was nice and after arresting your army and cia personal in georgia gift raped them and give it to usa

but this is a long tradition of russian arresting military units
and then freeing them to usa bu without their equipment

ww2 america send a bomber squadron in the east so they can bomb germany also from that direction
the beloved uncle Stalin that was the propaganda in the times decided to relief americans from their strategic bombers since russian had no one and america had then in 4 years they copied the design and they start producing them with a different name

well the american crew must be grateful that stalin release them and did not kill them

do they teach you this in your history lessons or is to painful to be touched???

thats why american are the laughing idiots of the rest world
they have stopped thinking
anything that goes we are the best we do only right
is immediately received as propaganda and lies

live in a fantasy world it does not matter
there are thinking people
and there are americans lol :biggrin:

 

ALIVE

Golden Member
May 21, 2012
1,960
0
0
And then there is you....what's your excuse?

in a topic you answer the topic and leave personal attacks away
if i was your president and i told you
i am shocked to find out that the stealth technology is a hype and we begin paying billions for nothing

that will attract the comment
you are east european
you are putin spokesman
or lasers

do you americans even know how to make a discussion with arguments?
apparently not

you answer with 1 line putting a tag to categorize me
thus suddenly what i say have no value

THATS INSANE STUPID
if something has value or nothing has nothing to do with who told it
but with what he told
you are not american you can not talk about american technology??'
we kick russian butt
but when i bring historical facts
more personal attacks???
more labeling????

so if suddenly i tell you that i am muslin
at you are muslin-phobic calling me wrong
that suddenly will make me right
and you will all stay in line to say i am sorry??


can you have any arguments or not?
if i am wrong by all means
point me my mistakes
 

Blitzvogel

Platinum Member
Oct 17, 2010
2,012
23
81
Interesting article. What is interesting is how old some aircraft designs really are, and how old the projects leading up to the prototypes are even older. The F-14 first flew in 1969. The F-15 in 1972, and the F-16 in 1974. However, design studies for these planes began much earlier than that, but it gives you and idea as to how much earlier engineers and scientists knew about new ideas and phenomenons before they appeared on actual aircraft.

Many people don't understand how the A-12 family of planes (YF-12, SR-71) were designed with some radar wave mitigating technologies like radar signal "traps" in the leading edges of the wing and chines.

I always looked at the F-14 as a prime turning point in fighter design, because it was deliberately designed to have the body produce a major portion of overall lift - about 40%. For American fighters, it was a return to creating fighters with a good maneuver envelope for close in dogfighting. This design directly influenced the Soviets in the design of the Su-27 and MiG-29 prototypes.

Also in consequence of stealth, Soviet fighters of the 80s popularized the Infrared Search and Track System (IRST) system that has seen a resurgence in western fighters now that they are reliable and powerful enough. Early IRST systems appeared in USAF fighters of the 1950s like the F-106, and even the YF-12, but were unreliable, added much complexity and of course didn't have the huge detection ranges of larger radars at the time. The F-35s EODAS system has very capable IR/Night Vision cameras that can detect major thermal signatures from extremely long ranges, so it doesn't need a dedicated IRST system at all AFAIK.
 

K7SN

Senior member
Jun 21, 2015
353
0
0
Interesting article. What is interesting is how old some aircraft designs really are, and how old the projects leading up to the prototypes are even older. The F-14 first flew in 1969. The F-15 in 1972, and the F-16 in 1974. However, design studies for these planes began much earlier than that, but it gives you and idea as to how much earlier engineers and scientists knew about new ideas and phenomenons before they appeared on actual aircraft.

Many people don't understand how the A-12 family of planes (YF-12, SR-71) were designed with some radar wave mitigating technologies like radar signal "traps" in the leading edges of the wing and chines.

I always looked at the F-14 as a prime turning point in fighter design, because it was deliberately designed to have the body produce a major portion of overall lift - about 40%. For American fighters, it was a return to creating fighters with a good maneuver envelope for close in dogfighting. This design directly influenced the Soviets in the design of the Su-27 and MiG-29 prototypes.

Also in consequence of stealth, Soviet fighters of the 80s popularized the Infrared Search and Track System (IRST) system that has seen a resurgence in western fighters now that they are reliable and powerful enough. Early IRST systems appeared in USAF fighters of the 1950s like the F-106, and even the YF-12, but were unreliable, added much complexity and of course didn't have the huge detection ranges of larger radars at the time. The F-35s EODAS system has very capable IR/Night Vision cameras that can detect major thermal signatures from extremely long ranges, so it doesn't need a dedicated IRST system at all AFAIK.

+1
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
in a topic you answer the topic and leave personal attacks away
if i was your president and i told you
i am shocked to find out that the stealth technology is a hype and we begin paying billions for nothing

that will attract the comment
you are east european
you are putin spokesman
or lasers

do you americans even know how to make a discussion with arguments?
apparently not

you answer with 1 line putting a tag to categorize me
thus suddenly what i say have no value

THATS INSANE STUPID
if something has value or nothing has nothing to do with who told it
but with what he told
you are not american you can not talk about american technology??'
we kick russian butt
but when i bring historical facts
more personal attacks???
more labeling????

so if suddenly i tell you that i am muslin
at you are muslin-phobic calling me wrong
that suddenly will make me right
and you will all stay in line to say i am sorry??


can you have any arguments or not?
if i am wrong by all means
point me my mistakes

Say hi to Stewox for me, I miss his vaccine rants.
 
Oct 9, 1999
19,632
37
91
war in Yugoslavia
while usa entered 5 km after the surrender of the serbians due to the minefields
form the thin air a division of russian appears in their capitol

the superior usa with all the satellite did not detect a whole division moving and heard it on the news of its arrival anyway in the same war they destroyed the chinese embassy because their intelligence told them it was not there
so yes usa is superior and russians are but hurt

georgia war
while usa had deployed cia and military agents inside the country for black ops against the neighbor russia it was soon clear that somethign would happen in the area

while usa and president bush was talkign on tv about usa army rapid deployment capabilities less than 24h and the dispach of an air carrier to the area to assist the georgian

the russians without usa detecting the concentration of the troops
made a rapid move from all the frontier eliminating the georgia army machine in hours

of course the rapid deployment of americans never happened did not have the time to do it
and then the fun begin
bush to putin
we sent the air carrier for humanitarian reason in the area you need to let it dock (in the port you already control)
putin to bush
you are wellcome to come and help with humanitarian after all the russian troops are here for humanitarian reasons also
bush to putin
usa will not permit any georgia soil to be lost
putin to bush
of course russia will not permit any georgia soil to be lost georgia soil is for georgian

next day russian assimilated 2/3 of the country
declaring that they brought russian soil under russian rule
soil that was never georgian

bush said nothing and call the air carrier back

another but hurt moment for the russians yes

when the recent history is a disgrace for your military and political leadership going from 1 defeat to another you are the one with mental issues

live in your fantasy propaganda world


Why do you type like a 4th grader? Is it that hard to provide information that is actually readable or did you spend all your time and money learning about radar tech and the American ego?
 

skimple

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2005
1,283
3
81
Why do you type like a 4th grader? Is it that hard to provide information that is actually readable or did you spend all your time and money learning about radar tech and the American ego?

Hey! I take offense to that!

My fourth grader is a much better typer/writer than "haiku-boy"
 

skimple

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2005
1,283
3
81
Such a xenophobic and condescending undertone going on here.

1 - Its not an undertone, its a direct reaction to the explicit insult delivered in post #3

"you over pay a plane for an ability that actual does not have
but thats the american way
all bs talk but no product to back it up"

2 - I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. Taking one person to task for an idiotic post they made does not indicate xenophobia.
 

RelaxTheMind

Platinum Member
Oct 15, 2002
2,245
0
76
1 - Its not an undertone, its a direct reaction to the explicit insult delivered in post #3

"you over pay a plane for an ability that actual does not have
but thats the american way
all bs talk but no product to back it up"

2 - I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. Taking one person to task for an idiotic post they made does not indicate xenophobia.

1. The person in post 3 was who i was referring to in the first place without direct quote since it seems to be several posts. But yeh its not an undertone, he is being quite blatant about it with the blanket statements and generalizations usually accustomed to militant xenophobes. Its called sarcasm.

2. They mean exactly what i meant them to mean.

3. This is a forum not reddit. The post above yours isnt usually directed at you unless quoted like you just did.
 

Gunbuster

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,852
23
81
I would be developing drone carriers ASAP. popping out thousands of baby drones with jamming, decoys, countermeasures, etc.. What is a fancy super radar and SAM site going to do when faced with the choice of 1,000+ targets made with off the shelf relatively cheap components?
 

ALIVE

Golden Member
May 21, 2012
1,960
0
0
I would be developing drone carriers ASAP. popping out thousands of baby drones with jamming, decoys, countermeasures, etc.. What is a fancy super radar and SAM site going to do when faced with the choice of 1,000+ targets made with off the shelf relatively cheap components?

what weaponry will this min drones have???

now days its not about 1 solo radar
is all about a network of radars
 

Pulsar

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2003
5,224
306
126
Such a xenophobic and condescending undertone going on here.

Irritation at some overly-nationalistic person who assumes he knows everything is hardly xenophobia.

If you can't see all the flaws and failures of logic in Alive's posts, I'm sure not going to help you find them. Suffice it to say the guy thinks he knows far more than he actually does.
 

ALIVE

Golden Member
May 21, 2012
1,960
0
0
Irritation at some overly-nationalistic person who assumes he knows everything is hardly xenophobia.

If you can't see all the flaws and failures of logic in Alive's posts, I'm sure not going to help you find them. Suffice it to say the guy thinks he knows far more than he actually does.

how stealth is implement in todays planes
1. strange angles to bounce out the single away from the radar
solution already implemented 2 radar 1 acting as transmitter and 1 acting as receiver

stealth by bouncing is busted f117a is not a stealth

2. stealth by absorbing material
while the absorption will never be 100% it is promising

change the frequency at the radar station
while the material can adsorb a range of frequencies can not adsorb them all

stealth by absorbing busted

3. the physical movement of the air craft in the air makes a turbulence in the air which you can use a radar to find that disturbance
extend the use of weather radars which track down air turbulences

by this mean you track not the plane but the physical evidence it leaves by moving through the air
where is the plane a little ahead from the detect anomaly

so please debug my reality
which of these 3 does not exist and why it does not exist
so far the only reason i am wrong is because you say so
because i am stupid because i am not American because because

constantly attacked personally but never 1 pick up the discussion to say way what i say its wrong
so i wait
do anyone have more info???
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |