igor_kavinski
Lifer
- Jul 27, 2020
- 20,921
- 14,496
- 146
The Sacklers. Pretty serious damage/kill count.I mean ever hear of rich corrupt people just protecting their interests?
The Sacklers. Pretty serious damage/kill count.I mean ever hear of rich corrupt people just protecting their interests?
Take it to the conspiracy thread. Literally no top management at Boeing was at risk from that lawsuit.You think any business interests that protected their money in that way had to be run by the mob? I mean ever hear of rich corrupt people just protecting their interests? The world is a pretty ugly place, and that goes way way beyond anything mob related btw.
Moved to Virginia...The more I learn about Corporate Washington state, the less I disbelieve.
Amazon and Starbucks come to mind as far as dirty tricks. Why not Boeing?
When, both are still in Seattle, at this time.Moved to Virginia...
Boeing is in Virginia. I may have misunderstood his argument thoughWhen, both are still in Seattle, at this time.
They've only been there for two years. I maintain they still have the Seattle mindset.
(And when did Wiki change page formats?)
OK, never mind. That was the crippled mobile version. The real version looks normal.
Ok so Boeing had no real bad press at the time and no interest in keeping a lower profile from other negative news relating to their mishaps. Interesting. Corporations would never do anything like that unless they are run by the mob. As if right? I mean what kind of uncivilized society do we live in anyway? This shit just doesn't happen. Clearly nobody else would do such a thing but the mob. I gotcha.Take it to the conspiracy thread. Literally no top management at Boeing was at risk from that lawsuit.
They were in Chicago for about 20 years before that.They've only been there for two years. I maintain they still have the Seattle mindset.
(And when did Wiki change page formats?)
OK, never mind. That was the crippled mobile version. The real version looks normal.
Okay, whatever. If you want to believe that corporations go around killing people over small value lawsuits, go ahead. This guy was likely whining about improper paperwork and MRB tags he didn't agree with, not things that were going to bring Boeing down or even get much news compared to a door coming off in flight.Ok so Boeing had no real bad press at the time and no interest in keeping a lower profile from other negative news relating to their mishaps. Interesting. Corporations would never do anything like that unless they are run by the mob. As if right? I mean what kind of uncivilized society do we live in anyway? This shit just doesn't happen. Clearly nobody else would do such a thing but the mob. I gotcha.
You mean they didn't kill the team mate reporting the issue?
Remember tho this kind of stuff is normal, should be ignored, plz keep flying so ppl keep their jobs.
Said literally no one. In this case, it appears the reporting process did it's job and they found the issue and are correcting it. Hopefully they figure out the real root cause and implement a proper systemic solution.Remember tho this kind of stuff is normal, should be ignored, plz keep flying so ppl keep their jobs.
Yeah it really appears to be working well, now that the truth of their willful misconduct is starting to leak out. I fail to see how you can spin that kind of positivity out of that report.Said literally no one. In this case, it appears the reporting process did it's job and they found the issue and are correcting it. Hopefully they figure out the real root cause and implement a proper systemic solution.
Oh you sweet summer child. If you only had an idea of how many verification tests on any given engineering project are missed, dropped, or reduced. Granted most aren’t falsified but occasionally they are.Yeah it really appears to be working well, now that the truth of their willful misconduct is starting to leak out. I fail to see how you can spin that kind of positivity out of that report.
It didn't leak out, Boeing management sent it out and told everyone. I guess you'd prefer the hide their problems and not fix them?Yeah it really appears to be working well, now that the truth of their willful misconduct is starting to leak out. I fail to see how you can spin that kind of positivity out of that report.
I agree with you, but in commercial you can't accept additional risk. You must show an equivalent level of safety.Oh you sweet summer child. If you only had an idea of how many verification tests on any given engineering project are missed, dropped, or reduced. Granted most aren’t falsified but occasionally they are.
When that happens you have to decide whether to redo the test, if it’s even possible, find some other way to justify the lack of the completed test, or accept extra risk.
The undeniably good part of this story is Boeing upper management is now saying/doing the right things. Skipping tests isn’t acceptable, they notified the regulator, and identified where in the process they could buy down the risk from the missing test.
This is step one to trying to right the ship at Boeing. They have a lot of steps to go.
It didn't leak out, Boeing management sent it out and told everyone. I guess you'd prefer the hide their problems and not fix them
Maybe the plan is to send monkeys first?Boeing won't fix leaky Starliner before flying first crew to ISS
Boeing is set to launch its first crewed space mission in June without fixing a small helium gas leak on its troubled Starliner spaceship, officials said Friday.phys.org