Brainonska511
Lifer
- Dec 10, 2005
- 25,515
- 8,937
- 136
I mean, isn't that part of the reason they had this shakedown certification flight - make sure everything is in working order? Seems that since issues have cropped up, NASA and Boeing are taking the conservative approach: examining the issues while they still have access to the docked vehicle, and putting the safety of the crew first. I think there are enough incidents in NASA's history to justify taking a safety-first approach instead of ignoring the engineering unknowns.Can't rely on Boeing to get going anymore it seems..
Could 2 NASA astronauts be stuck at the space station until next year? A decision is imminent
NASA is on the verge of deciding how and when to bring two astronauts back from the International Space Station, after running into trouble with their new Boeing capsule.apnews.com
Even before Wilmore and Williams blasted off June 5, their capsule sprang a leak in propulsion-related plumbing. Boeing and NASA judged the small helium leak to be stable and isolated, and proceeded with the test flight. But as Starliner approached the space station the next day, four more leaks erupted. Five thrusters also failed.
And despite the problems, I think having a second, capable crewable vehicle (once its certified) to take people into space is a good thing. Having something to counterbalance Musk and SpaceX should be a good thing.