Yes, though I don't know how much he's worth now as he lost a huge portion of his investment (fertilizer) due to the fire/explosion.
Whoaa!
Somebody is in a lot of trouble (civil suits etc.).
Fern
Yes, though I don't know how much he's worth now as he lost a huge portion of his investment (fertilizer) due to the fire/explosion.
These asshats hate our way of life and attacked us (placing bombs in a public place is an attack, right??) I would hope that one could see the difference between a kid lighting off a cherry bomb but then again, we have seen some asinine decisions being made when it comes to this.
I think anyone, especially a naturalized citizen, should automatically forfeit their citizenship if they are found guilty of being involved in attack on this country.
The only thing we would gain would be the ability to use 'advanced' interrogation techniques to find out if he might know of any future attacks that might be planned. Wouldn't this be worth it if it even saves the life of one US citizen?
Her and her buddy Obama can kiss my fucking ass.Now we have captured the two terrorists from Chechnya who come from the troubled region that is Muslim, but we cannot understand their motives, not yet. And Obama encourages us to refrain.
Progressive/Democrat professor thinks we were too tough on the poor widdle Muslim terrorists.
http://ruthobrien.org/a-day-of-terror/
Her and her buddy Obama can kiss my fucking ass.
The United States that I love hunts down terrorists AND follows human rights during capture. Giving the worst criminal or terrorist the most dignity during captivity shows why we should not be feared as a nation and is the best antidote to terrorism.
Never heard of her. I don't care what she thinks. Why do you? You seem to find it intolerable that anyone would dare disagree with you, whereas it seems to me the freedom to do so is more or less what this country is about.
Interestingly, if unsurprisingly, your paraphrase of her post is essentially misleading. What she's saying is essentially identical to what, among others, longtime POW John McCain has said:
This said, the mortuary pictures of the older brother of the two are extremely disturbing, raising questions as to whether the Boston Police Department captured him with too much force.
I remember they were blaming alkida so those two dummies that were caught, what were they?
from the article:
No reason to lie about it Vito.
"Lie," huh? Apparently you don't know what that word means. "Raising questions" about whether excessive force was used doesn't mean it was. Personally I would not second-guess the use of force against people who were shooting and throwing bombs at the police, but I am certainly not offended by someone willing to look at that issue. You, in your usual feigned-outrage fashion, are looking to make a mountain out of a molehill. Why do you even care what this relatively anonymous academic thinks anyway?
Has it ever occurred to you that the obnoxiously thin-skinned, intolerant persona you've created here makes you look like a total coward? I just KNOW you've never served in uniform - I never knew another GI who was your particular brand of whining pussy.
Here you see the liberal when faced with truth, fact, and common sense resort to insults. Deflection didn't work so this is the next step in their play book. Attacking the source clearly didn't work the first time so the liberal will follow these steps.
Deflect.
Attack source
Insult.
Deflect.
Attack source
Insult.
You're one to talk.
I am not responding to truth, fact, or common sense (none of which you have ever demonstrated an adult's grasp of). I am responding to faux outrage and whining by a simpleton partisan hack.
Do you still maintain this attack was perpetrated by "Hadjis," or "Middle Eastern terrorists"? Alternatively, do you admit you were wrong? Speaking of deflection (which you raised), I don't recall you ever admitting you were wrong about anything, including the election of Christine O'Donnell, the election of Rick Perry, and/or the election of Mitt Romney.
Cry more. I see that's become the latest tactic of the most useless righties, whining about "insults" whenever they're cornered in their lies and misinformation. As I said in another thread, you and your ilk are like a guy who smears himself with feces crying foul when others points out he stinks. The issue is how you behave, Spidey, not that people call out your behavior.You see the liberal here following the same play book I just described.
They just can't help themselves.
This liberal has hit the trifecta in just one paragraph.
"Lie," huh?
"Lie," huh? Apparently you don't know what that word means. "Raising questions" about whether excessive force was used doesn't mean it was.
Here you see the liberal when faced with truth, fact, and common sense resort to insults. Deflection didn't work so this is the next step in their play book. Attacking the source clearly didn't work the first time so the liberal will follow these steps.
Deflect.
Attack source
Insult.
Why bother? Spidey is impervious to reality. He is the poster boy for cognitive dissonance.You're one to talk.
I am not responding to truth, fact, or common sense (none of which you have ever demonstrated an adult's grasp of). I am responding to faux outrage and whining by a simpleton partisan hack.
Do you still maintain this attack was perpetrated by "Hadjis," or "Middle Eastern terrorists"? Alternatively, do you admit you were wrong? Speaking of deflection (which you raised), I don't recall you ever admitting you were wrong about anything, including the election of Christine O'Donnell, the election of Rick Perry, and/or the election of Mitt Romney.
But it's possible, too, that this reticence is a product of the very real suspicion that the perpetrators here are self-styled American patriots. At this point, most analysts are leaning that way.