And all you have is name-calling. Probably because you can't actually refute the facts.
Ever read this board whenever guns are brought up? We have people claiming with all sincerity that like, freely allowing machine guns to be bought and sold won't result in massacres because "they're only useful for suppressing fire" And so anything short of machine gun freedom is government tyranny.
They probably feared that the Newtown families might actually push through gun legislation through both houses, so this bombing is to stop it.
And right-wingers definitely feel persecuted. Always.
Furthermore, the demographic which participates in the Boston marathon are the urban elite that the survivalists loathe the most.
Let us know when you post some facts.
1. Boston marathon dedicated to Newtown
2. Newtown families near finish line.
3. bomb set off near finish line.
4. Gun bill going through congress.
5. bombing will disrupt focus on gun bill, lessening chance of passage
6. location of event makes it unlikely to be Islamic.
7. history of right wing attacks on sporting events using bombs with shrapnel (96 olympics)
8. no one has claimed responsibility. Typically, Islamic terrorists claim responsibility. Typically, right wing terrorists do not claim responsibility
Just some facts.
Is this you?
Huh.
It seems you are the equivalent of those who want to go and shoot Muslims because they all hate us and want to take over the world. You make a straw man out of people you don't like, but hell don't let that stand in the way of "facts" that you make up. We have some extreme right who I think are pretty sad cases. Congratulation, you've been promoted to the ranks of spiteful and mean spirited folk. It's entirely possible that some anti government group is responsible and that will be on those who did it, like it's on the Muslims who attacked on 9/11, but you like those who pronounced all Muslims as terrorists will do the same.
care to substantively address the arguments set forth? Are you able to?
1. Boston marathon dedicated to Newtown
2. Newtown families near finish line.
3. bomb set off near finish line.
4. Gun bill going through congress.
5. bombing will disrupt focus on gun bill, lessening chance of passage
6. location of event makes it unlikely to be Islamic.
7. history of right wing attacks on sporting events using bombs with shrapnel (96 olympics)
8. no one has claimed responsibility. Typically, Islamic terrorists claim responsibility. Typically, right wing terrorists do not claim responsibility
Just some facts.
I don't know how you came to this conclusion. You seem to be angry, operating on emotion and unable to address any facts set forth.
The death toll is quite low, suggesting a bomb that lacked shrapnel. A pipe bomb with nails used would produce a much higher death toll. So if this was a terrorism plot, the suspect in question lacks knowledge, or at least, wanted to reduce the death toll for some unknown reason, or possibly even had other motives such as assassination or experimentation. I do believe this was done by a lone wolf though regardless of motive.
I don't know how you came to this conclusion. You seem to be angry, operating on emotion and unable to address any facts set forth.
We already know that you are an idiot. Do you at least have the courage to say it to their faces that they are terrorists? No you don't because you're a coward lives in his mom's basement.
The death toll is quite low, suggesting a bomb that lacked shrapnel. A pipe bomb with nails used would produce a much higher death toll. So if this was a terrorism plot, the suspect in question lacks knowledge, or at least, wanted to reduce the death toll for some unknown reason, or possibly even had other motives such as assassination or experimentation. I do believe this was done by a lone wolf though regardless of motive.
Do you have the courage to say that to his face?
I doubt he wanted to minimize casualties.
Probably is a lone-wolf, judging by the simplicity of the bombs. It was a pressure cooker timed in a backpack.
Eh, also, Islamic terrorists tend to be...most complicated in their attacks. Like, Richard Reid's shoe bomb required a lot of ingenuity and an organization behind it. This one sounds more home-brew.
I will give some personal experiences about my dealings with Muslims. This is just from past experiences and observations.
No matter what country I have met Muslims they ALWAYS seem to put Islam before the Western Society they live in. You cannot imagine the negative things they say about Western people although they themselves are enjoying the Western "dream" and freedom.
For example, I have cousins who are Roman Catholic but born and raised in England. One of them in the past joined the British army while they were fighting the IRA. He eventually ended up doing a stint in Northern Ireland. He never once questioned his duty and the fact that he could kill a fellow Roman Catholic. Religion did not come first over duty to Country.
Now a Muslim has a high probability in my opinion to put Islam before any Country or army. One never knows when they can go Jihad on their own troops.
They love the Western freedom and choices but yet criticize the crap out the Western society they live in at the same time because it is not halal.
We already know that you are an idiot. Do you at least have the courage to say it to their faces that they are terrorists? No you don't because you're a coward lives in his mom's basement.