Yeah, cause the other guy is just a shining beacon of competence, morality, and ethics, right?
She definitely has some issues going on that go far beyond "pollen" or some other BS. The recent videos of her freezing seeming disoriented etc make it seem like she has something like parkinsons or a series of mini-strokes or something like that.
Regardless, her health issues just distract from all the real reasons she's a horrible candidate, the lies, the incompetence, the corruption etc.
She definitely has some issues going on that go far beyond "pollen" or some other BS. The recent videos of her freezing seeming disoriented etc make it seem like she has something like parkinsons or a series of mini-strokes or something like that.
Let's think through this statement, too. If she has parkinson and strokes yet still makes Trump look like some dunce with a gradeschool vocabulary, what the hell does that say about the standing of the two parties?
It doesn't matter if she wins by 20 points or 1 vote, the outcome is still the same.That she's that pathetic of a candidate since she isn't beating him by twenty points. How embarrassing for you.
Her having to withdraw and Kaine or Biden leading the ticket would be awesome actually.
That she's that pathetic of a candidate since she isn't beating him by twenty points. How embarrassing for you.
Video where she freezes? Is that the one where someone was rushing the stage and SS surrounded her? I know I saw some right wing sites showing that video claiming she just froze that didn't mention anything about the circumstances.
Yeah, cause the other guy is just a shining beacon of competence, morality, and ethics, right?
Your candidate is horrible / corrupt / crooked etc, and your best response is "but uh, the other guy is bad too!". That's pretty pathetic.
She's not really any of those things, but that's beside the point. What he was insinuating is that even if you believe the accusations against Clinton, Trump is not 'bad too' but is far, far worse. There has never been a more corrupt individual that has been a major party nominee, in all of US history which is of course ironic considering Republicans think Clinton is corrupt.
That's not hyperbole either. Trump is easily the most corrupt individual by a country mile. Yes I realize that includes Nixon.
lol, predictably spoken like a true hildabeast supporter. Trump might in fact be corrupt and crooked, but he can't hold a candle to hildebeast in that department. Not even close. She's the only nominee that would have been in jail if not for political clout and connections.
Yes, that was one of several similar ones I've seen recently. I don't know the particular circumstances, but it sure as heck seems like she's having anxiety issues, parkinsons, mini-strokes or some other problems. I don't think her health should automatically disqualify her as a candidate anyway, it just puts a little more emphasis on the VP who might have a higher chance of becoming the president during the term.
Of course he can. He has repeatedly and publicly bragged about bribing public officials. If you think Clinton is more corrupt than someone like that then show me specifics. Not insinuation, not right wing rumors, facts.
I don't have any issue with a candidate using a hearing aid.... assuming that's a hearing aid. I have no idea if it is or isn't..Any pics of her with a hearing aid? From last night's debate:
Again, funny stuff that you want to see facts when you are making accusations without facts yourself. If you have actual facts of illegal activity on his part, I'm sure there would be a legion of people (both R and D) that would love to torpedo Trump, and he doesn't have the political connections to shield him from any consequences......
As a businessman and a very substantial donor to very important people, when you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do. As a businessman, I need that.
Without facts? Are you joking? He has literally stated as much.
In his own words:
By all means try and twist yourself into knots so that's not a statement of bribery.
So basically he said you can influence politicians by donating to them, and that he's done so. Oh, and here's another shocker for you, water is wet too! Really! There is nothing illegal about donating money to some foundation or group in the hope (wink wink!) that some politician might have a more favorable view of something you care about. On the other hand, a politician accepting money and in return taking certain actions IS illegal.
So as expected, you have no proof of anything illegal or even inappropriate having been done.
So basically he said you can influence politicians by donating to them, and that he's done so. Oh, and here's another shocker for you, water is wet too! Really! There is nothing illegal about donating money to some foundation or group in the hope (wink wink!) that some politician might have a more favorable view of something you care about. On the other hand, a politician accepting money and in return taking certain actions IS illegal.
So as expected, you have no proof of anything illegal or even inappropriate having been done.
Any pics of her with a hearing aid? From last night's debate:
Any pics of her with a hearing aid? From last night's debate:
I do like the way you upload images to imgur to anonymize the source.
Well. There is something illegal about setting up 18 shell corporations to donate 18X more than allowed. Or donating from a charitable organization to a campaign. There is actually a long list of the illegal contributions Trump has made over the years and the hundreds of thousands in fines he has paid for doing so. So Trump is the only one of the two who has has been found to have broken the law. Clinton is guilty because you believe she is.
A) does the source really matter? B) does her wearing a hearing aid matter? I don't see a problem with her (or anyone else) wearing a hearing aid.
So in other words someone openly stating 'I give people money so they will do what I want them to' doesn't meet your standard for bribery.
Wow.