The school was required by state law to turn the situation over to the legal system.
The law was written to provide no wiggle room.
Then the fault lies with the lawmakers and the idiots who elect the lawmakers. The school administrators did NOTHING wrong. They're the only ones who are NOT wrong in this scenario and not so coincidentally they're the ones that the ATOT idiots want to be at fault.
The law is idiotic.
The people who passed the law should be impeached.
The kid is an idiot.
The parents are negligent.
The school admins did what they were required to do.
This isn't rocket science.
So if the law requires you to shoot your family will you do it? I think not. We all make choices.
is "let it flow" a euphemism for autoerotic asphyxiation?
underwear vs bathing suit???? I don't see the difference? Would he have been labeled a sex offender if he was wearing a bathing suit? such as those worn by the swimming team in high school? I don't understand? Are running shorts the track team wears labeled also as sex offender shorts?
No, "back yard" is a euphemism for cheap hooker tied to the ground...
school bureaucracy = libtards at work
high school kids dont' wear tighty whities. im calling shens.
I did. Never learned about fancy underwears until about a year or two into the Navy.
Clothing is appropriate for certain occasions/locations.
The kid was trying to draw attention. If no clothing so be it.
Again, the problem was the laws, as written, allows for no wiggle room/discression
high school kids dont' wear tighty whities. im calling shens.
Law classifies the incident as indecent exposure.
You want a kid in his underwear prancing around your daughter in school?
Kid was caught in a grey area and did not have the willpower to fight for himself. Nor did his family step up.
Such is derived from the one sided article.
I did. Never learned about fancy underwears until about a year or two into the Navy.