Bradley Manning verdict

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
A that intelligence has since contributed to deaths of people.

So were did EK go??????

Bailed out after it was proved he was lying agaign? Typical. He stated that as a fact, and said people died. And once again, he provided no proof, and no rebuttal to the facts we presented.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
I hope the runty, pencil-neck douchebag spends the next 30 years ass raped by psychopaths. He and his American-hating kindred spirit douchebag, Snowden, can take turns as comfort women in the federal penitentiary system. Whistle-blowers?? Nope, not hardly. But they'll be blowin' a lot of something else!!

So I gather you are OK with the NSA getting all your private info without your consent and some random nobody can browse through it at their leisure. That is unrelated to this case but you brought up Snowdon as well which is IMO not even remotely the same type of information leak.
 
Last edited:

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
We really ought to amend the oath to just protecting against all foreign enemies and just leave it at that. If the Army really protected us against domestic, the lobbyists would be arrest/special interest groups would get cracked down on and there would be a coup of congress/NSA etc.
 

mistercrabby

Senior member
Mar 9, 2013
963
53
91
So I gather you are OK with the NSA getting all your private info without your consent and some random nobody can browse through it at their leisure. That is unrelated to this case but you brought up Snowdon as well which is IMO not even remotely the same type of information leak.

I wouldn't say I'm 'OK' with it. I recognize a legitimate law enforcement and threat containment rational for many of these activities. I think the pendulum swings too far in one direction or the other and we have to course-correct.

If the FBI can quickly eliminate me as a suspect and get onto finding the real bad guy by snooping my Visa card, I'm not really bothered.

The part of about the some random nobody is the hitch. We have to have solid controls aournd that. It's like medical records, right? You don't want people not specifically involved in the case doing that, but you do want the doctor and nurse treating you to have the info. So that part of your question has a point.

It's an especially important point when it comes to release of the information to 3rd parties who were never intended to see it. And who should make that call.

Which brings us to the last part of your post, the question of Manning-Snowden-Assange. The douchebag trifecta!

My view is that classified is classified and whether you're a contractor, gov employee or a uniformed service member of the intelligence community, you don't do that shit. Period. The last pixel on the end of the period. Makes sense?

Assange is a dirtbag but he's not our dirtbag. He didn't have a duty to protect the information, and by exension, us, the way Manning and Snowden did.

So help me understand why you think the leaks are different?
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
Then a couple of months later, the government quietly had to admit they had no evidence that anyone was killed. Oops....guess you missed that huh? Oh right, it was something you didn't want to accept, so you probably just ignored it.

Conveniently overlooked is that fact that how much intelligence is being shared with the US that is no longer being done.
And could some of that intelligence have prevented causalities.

One can not prove a negative.

All that is known is that shared intelligence used to be able to be worked together to defeat plans of the opponents.

So were did EK go??????
Some have work to do

Bailed out after it was proved he was lying again? Typical. He stated that as a fact, and said people died. And once again, he provided no proof, and no rebuttal to the facts we presented.
I do not have access to foreign intelligence info any more.

What a military officer testified is what he knew of at the time and as it resulted in known non-classified information from the US side.

What has happened since then; stuff that may have been classified; info that may not have been revealed to them and info from allies was not made available and/or able to be discussed.

There was a saying a few years ago: Loose lips sink ships.
Might be difficult to prove that a bomber or U-Boat was able to get into position based on gossip; but potential was there. Cables to Axis intelligence did not include the source of gossip; just the fact that the info was determined to be of such quality level. And that was for the same reason - to protect the source

Less intelligence leads to longer lead times/poorer planning.

We have no way of knowing what others are doing if they no longer tell us and the results of such.
 
Last edited:

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
The fact of the matter much of the evidence in this case is still classified so the public will not know until it's been declassified.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130812/mannings-mental-health-at-issue-sentencing

The prosecution has portrayed Manning as a traitor and last week called on witnesses who described the effect of the disclosures, though much of their testimony was behind closed doors as it touched on classified details.
Rear Admiral Kevin Donegan, who was head of operations for US Central Command at the time of the leaks, said troops in Iraq and Afghanistan were ordered to warn people and villages exposed in the files that they were at risk.
Troops told the sources identified in the published documents that they were "potentially in jeopardy and some of them in danger of retaliation from the enemy," the Navy admiral said.

None the less, Bradley Manning will be very old and gray before he's a free man again.
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
Conveniently overlooked is that fact that how much intelligence is being shared with the US that is no longer being done.
And could some of that intelligence have prevented causalities.

One can not prove a negative.

All that is known is that shared intelligence used to be able to be worked together to defeat plans of the opponents.


I do not have access to foreign intelligence info any more.

What a military officer testified is what he knew of at the time and as it resulted in known non-classified information from the US side.

What has happened since then; stuff that may have been classified; info that may not have been revealed to them and info from allies was not made available and/or able to be discussed.

There was a saying a few years ago: Loose lips sink ships.
Might be difficult to prove that a bomber or U-Boat was able to get into position based on gossip; but potential was there. Cables to Axis intelligence did not include the source of gossip; just the fact that the info was determined to be of such quality level. And that was for the same reason - to protect the source

Less intelligence leads to longer lead times/poorer planning.

We have no way of knowing what others are doing if they no longer tell us and the results of such.

LOL...man...you and palehorse sure do some serious mental contortions and lying to try and justify your lies. Typical of a bigoted troll though, you even threw in an immediate personal attack on me becuase you caouldn't defend your post.

Let me make it clear since you are trying to weasel out of your lies.You clearly stated:

that intelligence has since contributed to deaths of people.

You didn't say maybe, hypotheticaly or anything else. You said people died. Full stop. And as usual, you based your "knowledge" (I use that term loosely with you) since with you it means "my personal beliefs") on what? Random news reports from years ago? Did you even bother to google to see if you were right?

So again, a senior Army officer testified under oath that no one died. You quite clearly have stated that people did die. Are cyou laiming he perjured himself? That is a serious accusation.

Lets see.....who to believe? the bigot posting on a tech forum or the serving military officer with clearance to investigate? Wow, such a tough choice. I think most of us will believe the officer that testified under oath.

So again you have proof that people died? Or are you just trolling as usual? Post some proof or admit you lied. All this hand waving doesn't do anything but show you are trolling and refuse to admit the truth.
 

mistercrabby

Senior member
Mar 9, 2013
963
53
91
Sounds like Manning was trying pull a "Section 8"...



So, the picture is finally starting to come together...
http://www.tulsaworld.com/article.a..._to_work/20130813_298_0_FORTME404649?subj=298

Manning is unhappy being stuck in the desert with all a bunch of, his words, “ignorant rednecks”, doing grunt-level intel work. He tries to get sent home by acting like an asshole, being late for work, and pretending to have "issues".

He even sends is boss a picture, "Bufallo Bill"-style. His supervisor, SFC Adkins said that in April 2010, Manning emailed him a picture of himself in a blonde wig and lipstick attached to a letter titled, “My problem.” (I Googled and no dice on a pic. Dammit! I want to know what shade he prefers.):sneaky:

How could that not work!?!

But it doesn't, so, blammo, he decides to give a big, old red lipstick kiss-off to uncle sam by leaking the biggest trove of classified documents in US history!!

You go, girl! er boy! or whatever. not being anti-GLBT, cause i don't believe he ever had any "confusion", just using it to scam the Army! (i ain't the only one, 'cause you ever notice the crickets from that segment?).

It will be interesting to see whether the judge buys all this nonsense about his "mental fragility" in passing sentance.

For all you out there that thought he was doing the world a "favor", out of the goodness of his sweet little heart, trying to make the horror out there go away, you're all suckers. :whiste:

He didn't do it to be the hero of the moral high ground, nor because he was confused about his hangy-downy parts and neither because Julian brain-washed him. He did it for revenge.
 

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,660
491
126
Sounds like the judge split the difference between what the defense and what the prosecution wanted.

He might get out sooner than 35 years. I hope he does considering the conditions he was kept under while awaiting trial.

But he does probably deserve to serve more than 20 for just handing over information indiscriminately.

Too bad he didn't exercise better judgement in what he released instead of giving everything he had to another person.

By that I mean if he had just released the video and any documents that might have been related to that video I believe his sentence would have been much much less.

Instead he gets many years and not many people know about the video, or care that it is compelling (imo) evidence of an alleged war crime.
 

mistercrabby

Senior member
Mar 9, 2013
963
53
91
Manning deserves what he gets. He ain't no hero, he's a selfish ass who betrayed his country's trust.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Sounds like Manning was trying pull a "Section 8"...



So, the picture is finally starting to come together...
http://www.tulsaworld.com/article.a..._to_work/20130813_298_0_FORTME404649?subj=298

Manning is unhappy being stuck in the desert with all a bunch of, his words, “ignorant rednecks”, doing grunt-level intel work. He tries to get sent home by acting like an asshole, being late for work, and pretending to have "issues".

He even sends is boss a picture, "Bufallo Bill"-style. His supervisor, SFC Adkins said that in April 2010, Manning emailed him a picture of himself in a blonde wig and lipstick attached to a letter titled, “My problem.” (I Googled and no dice on a pic. Dammit! I want to know what shade he prefers.):sneaky:

How could that not work!?!

But it doesn't, so, blammo, he decides to give a big, old red lipstick kiss-off to uncle sam by leaking the biggest trove of classified documents in US history!!

You go, girl! er boy! or whatever. not being anti-GLBT, cause i don't believe he ever had any "confusion", just using it to scam the Army! (i ain't the only one, 'cause you ever notice the crickets from that segment?).

It will be interesting to see whether the judge buys all this nonsense about his "mental fragility" in passing sentance.

For all you out there that thought he was doing the world a "favor", out of the goodness of his sweet little heart, trying to make the horror out there go away, you're all suckers. :whiste:

He didn't do it to be the hero of the moral high ground, nor because he was confused about his hangy-downy parts and neither because Julian brain-washed him. He did it for revenge.


Sounds like short guy syndrome, especially with the violence outbursts. The latter isn't in line with gender identity issues.
 

Darkman

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2013
4,033
0
0
Many people "on top" (and in the government) are bigger sinners than this loser.

1/3 of 35 years = almost 12 years ...

Let him do 12 years ... (which is quite a period in itself) ... and let him da f*ck out.
 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
Many people "on top" (and in the government) are bigger sinners than this loser.

1/3 of 35 years = almost 12 years ...

Let him do 12 years ... (which is quite a period in itself) ... and let him da f*ck out.

The people in power do more harm to this country. They have wasted trillions of dollars and destroy countless lives in meaningless wars, but they never go trial.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
Speaking of betraying our country's trust, how about the dishonorable treatment of him while in custody?

That was addressed by the same military court that tried him.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...rom-this-this-is-just-a-stage-in-my-life.html

Manning is expected to serve his sentence at Fort Leavenworth, where he has been in pretrial confinement since April 2011. Prior to that Manning was held in pre-trial confinement at Marine Corp Base Quantico Brig for nine months. U.N. special rapporteur on torture Juan Ernesto Mendez called his treatment at the Quantico Brig &#8220;cruel, inhuman and degrading.&#8221; Manning was forced to strip and remain on a suicide risk regime against the recommendations of Brig mental health professionals. Lind ruled that a portion of his time at Quantico was unlawful, but granted Manning only 112 days of credit on his sentence for it. Manning sentence's of 35 years will also be reduced by 1,293 days for time already served.
Also some of this so called bad treatment was due to decisions Manning made rather than being forced upon him by military personnel.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/01/08/53730.htm
Col. Denise Lind, the military judge, spent nearly two hours Tuesday reading into the record. The ruling strikes a defiant tone at the international and media outrage against Manning's treatment in the now-shuttered Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Va.
In her lengthy factual findings, Lind exonerated the three-star general accused of inappropriately influencing his staff, and she deferred almost entirely to the government's interpretation of the disputed events.
She found that Manning never endured solitary confinement, that he was never forced to stand naked at morning call, and that guards never harassed him in response to public protest.
During Manning's nine-month detention, such issues have sparked rallies and protests by prominent national and international figures.
A month after Manning's lawyer spoke to the press about his client's treatment, former State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told a roomful of reporters that the treatment of Manning was "ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid." He was subsequently forced to resign.
Likewise, in a report for the United Nations, special rappoteur on torture Juan Mendez slammed Manning's "cruel, degrading and inhuman" treatment.
Mendez said he might have used stronger words if Quantico had not denied him access for an unmonitored visit.
Then-Rep. Dennis Kucinich complained that he was kept out of the prison, too.
But Lind said Tuesday that "this was appropriate."
"Neither Mr. Mendez nor Congressman Kucinich were on the accused's visitation list," she said.
Quantico staff acted with Manning's safety in mind to prevent him from committing suicide, the colonel ruled, conceding that they occasionally broke regulations out of "overcaution."
In each of these instances, she granted 1-to-1 sentencing credit or a fraction of that amount.
Seven of those days stem from the time Manning spent on suicide risk, after his psychologist determined that it was unnecessary.
Though Lind found that these decisions violated the secretary of the Navy's rules, she appeared to shift some blame to Capt. William Hocter, the brig psychologist who treated Manning.
Brig staff mistrusted Hocter and blamed him for the suicide of another detainee, Lind noted.
Quantico subsequently cleared Hocter - and the rest of the brig staff - of wrongdoing after an investigation of the suicide, but this is not mentioned in Lind's ruling.
Lind also granted credit for 75 days that Manning spent on prevention of injury watch, also against psychologist recommendations.
Another 20 days credit stemmed from the brig's ordered removal of Manning's underwear after he made a sarcastic remark about being able to kill himself with the elastic.
"This decision is a very close call," she said.
A final 10 days will credit the time that Manning had 20 minutes of recreation time, rather than the standard hour.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |