Blackjack200
Lifer
- May 28, 2007
- 15,995
- 1,688
- 126
Yes, some have stadiums. None have all the housing and the public transport volume necessary. Los Angeles was successful because it built no new venues and funneled almost the entire budget into housing and public transportation which are useful investments in the long run. And lots of other cities could do the same, use existing stadiums to avoid the big-ticket budget killers. But nobody has the ability to host the Olympics turn-key where they can get the bid and just hang up some banners. Even the most prepared sites would still require substantial building projects to work.
Yes, you're right, I made it sound turn-key. I should have said that most of the major infrastructure is in place, i.e. the stadiums. The Olympic Village and dorms and stuff would probably still need to be built (but really, just reserve rooms at hotels because you have like 8 years notice )