Breaking- Church shooting in TX

Page 49 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
Training and competency testing are great. I agree.

They won’t completely stop fatal mistakes but would be an excellent start at reducing accidental shootings

I haven’t seen anyone argue that it’s impossible that sometimes a good guy with a gun will stop a bad guy. Not even Zin.

I’m saying there’s a significant cost to arming enough people that a good guy with a gun actually makes a positive difference.

See my edit with new link, quote (especially about how to handle a gun properly) and info.

Do you own a gun? Yes or No before I answer further.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,123
14,491
146
Do you own a gun? Yes or No before I answer further.
No

The additional risk to my family of having a gun in the house, even though I would:
  • Keep it locked in a gun safe
  • Keep it unloaded
  • Require my wife and kids to learn how to use it
Is not worth the minimal potential benefit of maybe being useful if we were in a violent situation.

(I have shot guns before. I’ve gone skeet shooting several times and enjoyed it)
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126

Thank you for your honest answer and not wimp out like certain posters. Thumb up. I do not need to say anything further.

One more thing, can you or anyone post a link or two about any shooting that happened because of (or even with) properly handling of gun (see my link above about how to handle a gun properly, heck here is another one - http://www.magtechammunition.com/resources/safety-university/nra-gun-safety/ ) and not something like this from the story you just posted?

......he began handling a gun that he thought was unloaded.

Or leave the loaded gun on the table with young kids around or pointed at someone because he/she thought the gun was not loaded or shoot at someone/something before identify the target correctly (remember that "Blade Runner" from South Africa that shot his girlfriend even she was behind a door?) or was drinking alcohol or smoking weed....etc.

I like to see a link or two about guns just went off for no reason and not in any violation of the rules how to handle gun properly.
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,143
30,099
146
Zin I called you out for being an asshole lying about someone who risked their life to save others. And you are. Both a liar about this when you kept insisting things you couldn't possibly have known, and an asshole for trying desperately to discredit someone (which you're still attempting to do in your backhanded little way) who did a courageous thing vs. you always taking the coward route.

And you know you are. Your ilk pretends to do battle against mostly imaginary enemies. You like to imagine evil and then falsely accuse others of it so you can pretend to be a victim.

This person stepped up and took on an evil person in reality. No wonder you and other cowards wish if weren't so and try desperately to discredit. It stands in stark contrast to your cowardice. Once more... own it.

I lied about what that guy did? Where? I realize this will be a complicated task for you, as not one of you has deigned to address a thing that I have actually said, but nonetheless, I charge you in seeking out where I claimed that the dude did not go out and shoot the murderer for what he reasonably assumed the murderer's intentions were.

good luck
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,123
14,491
146
Thank you for your honest answer and not wimp out like certain posters. Thumb up. I do not need to say anything further.

One more thing, can you or anyone post a link or two about any shooting that happened because (or even with) properly handling of gun (see my link above about how to handle a gun properly, heck here is another one - http://www.magtechammunition.com/resources/safety-university/nra-gun-safety/ ) and not something like this from the story you just posted?



Or leave the loaded gun on the table with young kids around or pointed at someone because he/she thought the gun was not loaded or shoot at someone/something before identify the target correctly (remember that "Blade Runner" from South Africa that shot his girlfriend even she was behind a door?)..etc.

I like to see a link or two about guns just went off for no reason.

I’ll let someone else look for that because for my point a person needs to be involved.

People & guns are the problem not guns alone.

At my particular place of employment we spend millions on training, simulations, and certifications to reduce human error. The right error at the wrong time could lead to loss of crew or $$$$$ damage.

If I remember the numbers right 99.998% of the time our operations are error free. Notice it’s still not 100% despite the massive effort to make no mistakes. This is because even the most highly trained and conscientious person can and will make a mistake eventually.

If we apply that 99.998% error free percentage to owning a weapon it basically means on average a highly trained individual will make 1 error like leaving your weapon unattended or not realizing it’s loaded every 5000 times they handle a weapon. You might hit 5000 times in a lifetime if you only handle a gun one 1 or 2 times a week or in less than 10 years if you conceal carry every day.

Some obvious caveats:
  • Making an error like leaving a loaded weapon unattended does not mean something catastrophic must happen
  • Some gun owners probably are trained in safety as well as we are at our job
  • Most however are not so they will be making errors at a higher rate
My basic point is those people you refer to as not handling their weapons properly, those are all gun owners at some point or another. For most their mistake won’t cost anyone anything for some it will be catastrophic.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
I’ll let someone else look for that because for my point a person needs to be involved.

People & guns are the problem not guns alone.

At my particular place of employment we spend millions on training, simulations, and certifications to reduce human error. The right error at the wrong time could lead to loss of crew or $$$$$ damage.

If I remember the numbers right 99.998% of the time our operations are error free. Notice it’s still not 100% despite the massive effort to make no mistakes. This is because even the most highly trained and conscientious person can and will make a mistake eventually.

If we apply that 99.998% error free percentage to owning a weapon it basically means on average a highly trained individual will make 1 error like leaving your weapon unattended or not realizing it’s loaded every 5000 times they handle a weapon. You might hit 5000 times in a lifetime if you only handle a gun one 1 or 2 times a week or in less than 10 years if you conceal carry every day.

Some obvious caveats:
  • Making an error like leaving a loaded weapon unattended does not mean something catastrophic must happen
  • Some gun owners probably are trained in safety as well as we are at our job
  • Most however are not so they will be making errors at a higher rate
My basic point is those people you refer to as not handling their weapons properly, those are all gun owners at some point or another. For most their mistake won’t cost anyone anything for some it will be catastrophic.

I see your points and you seem to be reasonable so I will reply.

Nothing in life is 100% safe or risk free, nothing. I understand that and I am willing to accept that risk but I will NOT accept carelessness/irresponsibility as the main cause(s) for unneccessary higher risk (see your link above and the story about the Blade Runner).

You spoke about some mistakes were not as serious as others and I agree.

That's why one of the most important rule of how to handle gun properly is DO NOT ever ever point at anyone/anything that you do not want to shoot at. Why? Because even if you "forgot" to check if the gun was loaded (one part of the rules too) but you did not point at a person/living being then even if the gun went off (a huge f*** up btw), the mistake would not be as catastrophic as you would point the gun at the person/living being.

I haven't read/hear about anyone was killed/injured from any gun went off by its lonesome self. Each and every single case of "accidental discharge/shooting", a gun was mishandled in a unsafe and irresponsible way. No need for that.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,090
136
We do? What was the extent of his injury before he got in his car and drove away?

We know someone shot him. We don't know if he stopped anything else from happening as anything beyond that is an assumption of what his intent is next. As far as we know he was done. It would fit the norm of these types of events. In that case nothing was stopped.
He literally does not understand you. It's really that simple. He does not understand logic. Don't bother.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,090
136
Got news for you. Cops aren't that great at shooting either. A lot of them are worst than the 'gun nuts' because a lot of 'gun nuts' go to the range a lot but many cops only go once a year to qualify.
You think it's a wise "pro gun" argument to remind us that even trained police officers are, generally, awful marksmen in action...?
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,702
8,926
146
You think it's a wise "pro gun" argument to remind us that even trained police officers are, generally, awful marksmen in action...?
It's not about pinpoint marksmanship in that situation. It's about ability to respond in the situation. I'm sorry but billy bob who hits the range now and then has no idea what to do in that type of situation.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,558
15,444
136

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,143
30,099
146

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,090
136
Do you own a gun? Yes or No before I answer further.

Just out of curiosity, why does it matter?

Also, I have to say that I find your argument regarding dismissing any injuries related to mishandling of firearms perplexing. Of course a firearm in and of itself cause any harm. Of course the Colonel's rules for firearm handling are air tight (they're self fulfilling). But isn't that a bit of an odd argument given that we're discussing human interaction with firearms and humans are inherently flawed creatures? That would be like not talking about car accidents from a public policy point because if used "properly" there should never be an accident. Well, sure, but .... We live in reality, and must used rules from that world, not from a more perfect universe.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,774
40,262
136
Good thing that Alex Jones has brain tonics to sell to people that prevents them from easy mind control and thus shooting up innocent people. You know, because that's what it takes to stay reasonable.

We call it humble lead.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,558
15,444
136
Whatever you say. Not very many people on the right could be described that way any more.

Exactly! Which is why it's important to distinguish between the two. I would welcome more conservatives instead of alienate them. They are an endangered species.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Video of the end of the Texas shooter pursuit. Sounds like the guy who stopped this mad man had to get to his safe to get his gun, slowing down his actions. Pretty amazing video, you can see how full of adrenaline he must be. The reality of what just happened was probably settling in. Guess he used an AR15 to stop the guy, too.
 
Last edited:

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,671
136
Video of the end of the Texas shooter pursuit. Sounds like the guy who stopped this mad man had to get to his safe to get his gun, slowing down his actions. Pretty amazing video, you can see how full of adrenaline he must be. The reality of what just happened was probably settling in. Guess he used an AR15 to stop the guy, too.

Sounds like? he must be? Probably? Guess he? So you sure about all that?

Seriously this what gets you excited, a blurry picture and a beer gut?
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Sounds like? he must be? Probably? Guess he? So you sure about all that?

Seriously this what gets you excited, a blurry picture and a beer gut?

No matter which side of the gun debate you are on, I think this is an intriguing video. The guy stopped a mass murderer and you're focused on his gut.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |