Breaking: Mass Shooting at Ft. Hood

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
BLAH BLAH BLAH So Hasan was obviously just another nutcase, and attempts to brand him as anything else are absurd.

OK Bozo, if he is not an Islamist terrorist then how do you explain this:

Regardless of word games and beating people over the head with dictionary definitions of terrorism, the fact remains that we had a solider who identified with our killers and then turned around and killed us. The ideology he identified with was Islam and barring his connection to that I contend that he would not have had a reason to snap.

That he was contacting Islamic terrorists and shares a history in a Virginia mosque with 9-11 hijackers is all the more damning for your notion.

And what do you have to say about this:

Even if he blew himself up yelling alah ackbar this administration and the left would still refuse to call it a terrorist attack by a radical muslim. And in my opinion (really fact) there is nothing different from blowing himself up and this shooting. The motivations and outcome are one and the same - to carry out his personal jihad which he has been instructed to do by muslim leaders.

Go ahead Kyle, explain this reality away so that it fits your own version of the real world. It's always good for a laugh.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Funny how everyone made fun of McCain when he hinted that Obama would take the country back to a pre 9/11 mentality and then this happens...
(not saying that the shooting was funny)

Everyone saw the writing on the wall and the government even knew about this guy but was too chicken shit to act on it because they were afraid of being called politically incorrect.

These deaths are 100% on the government.
You do realize, don't you, that the FBI determined in December of 2008 - on Bush's watch - that Hasan had been communicating with Anwar al Awlaki, but decided that the communications were consistent with the research Hasan was doing, and were innocent.

So, are you telling us you blame Bush?
 

BMW540I6speed

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2005
1,055
0
0
Even if he blew himself up yelling alah ackbar this administration and the left would still refuse to call it a terrorist attack by a radical muslim.

LolZ, at this time in the investigation, the "right" isn't calling it one either...

From the links above, Jonah Goldberg said:

"He committed treason and murder. It was a cowardly act. If we are at war, then it was a war crime."
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
LolZ, at this time in the investigation, the "right" isn't calling it one either...

From the links above, Jonah Goldberg said:

"He committed treason and murder. It was a cowardly act. If we are at war, then it was a war crime."

We sure as hell are calling it a terrorist attack on American soil regardless of what talking heads say. Call a spade a spade and screw political correctness - muslim terrorist carrying out jihad. Have a quick military trial and send him to the firing squad.

Remember the oath to The Constitution - "protect from enemies both foreign AND domestic"
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Versus the conservative position: Christian + killer = murderer. Muslim + killer = jihadist terrorist. Amirite?


Can we arrest people for thought crime?


Can we arrest people for Anti-American thoughts?


Why didn't his fellow physician confront him? And then what? A stern warning?

If some scrawny Asian college student can gun down an entire classroom, I don't think a trained member of our military would have any issues carrying out mass murder.

Short of imprisoning people for "pre-crime", you can't do anything about it.

Wow, you state the liberal position quite well, thanks. Obviously there is no way for the military to control who can and cannot be in the military at a given time. And clearly there is no middle ground between arresting someone and doing nothing. So surely (in the liberal world at least) nothing could possibly have been done, otherwise Government would surely have done it. /sarcasm

As to Christian murderers, if a Christian shoots a bunch of people in an abortion clinic while yelling "Abortion is murder!" then I would consider him a terrorist, the object of the shooting being not only to kill people, but to do so in such a way as to terrorize others into accepting his preferred actions.

BMW, National Review does not establish the "conservative position", nor is there anything preventing its columnists from adopting liberal positions. It's not a binary world.
 

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
Even if he blew himself up yelling alah ackbar this administration and the left would still refuse to call it a terrorist attack by a radical muslim. And in my opinion (really fact) there is nothing different from blowing himself up and this shooting. The motivations and outcome are one and the same - to carry out his personal jihad which he has been instructed to do by muslim leaders.

Muslim leaders do not lead radical Muslims. I'm glad we are not in a rush to label him a terrorist, because that is a really convenient way for an administration to strip someone of all their rights. I'm sorry, but my definition of terrorism does not include random acts of violence. The "threshold" is a little higher in my book.

A little video I uploaded for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaWmumbsCvg

We're ignoring the fact that this guy was a trauma specialist. No one is talking about counter-transference, secondary trauma, or suicide by police. People are outright dismissing other relevant facts, like how he was obviously ostracized by a fellow soldier. We are acting like it's a radical concept that someone would believe the Laws of God trump the Laws of Man, or that it's a radical idea that someone would struggle with the idea of killing someone else like themselves because they took an oath. We are only looking for stuff that supports our preconceived notions of why this crime was committed based on his last name.

We've already decided what the cause of this attack was, and god damn it, all the other facts don't matter. Anyone who disagrees is a liberal politically correct anti-American fool. It's fucking pathetic and displays a level of ignorance that is truly revolting. However, that isn't the worst part. The most revolting thing about this entire episode is that it will lead to even more ostracizing of Muslim Americans, which will probably lead to even more violence.

To me this is more demonstration that the 9/11 attacks were successful. Americans are scared. We are now confusing actual terrorism with random acts of violence. People are looking for patterns, in hopes that they can predict when this will happen again and they can be safe. Many Americans simply cannot accept the fact that this was a random and senseless act of violence against our troops. They need something more firm to cling to, and if this thread is any evidence, a lot of people are clinging to the idea that Muslims can't be trusted. It won't work. You can't predict when someone will do something like this. You can never be 'safe' and the sooner you realize it, the happier you will be. What's truly sad is that some of these same people thump the Constitution in one hand while advocating we strip a certain group of it's civil rights with the other. That scares me a whole hell of a lot more than anything this guy did.
 
Last edited:

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
<snip>
To me this is more demonstration that the 9/11 attacks were successful. Americans are scared. We are now confusing actual terrorism with random acts of violence. People are looking for patterns, in hopes that they can predict when this will happen again and they can be safe. Many Americans simply cannot accept the fact that this was a random and senseless act of violence against our troops. They need something more firm to cling to, and if this thread is any evidence, a lot of people are clinging to the idea that Muslims can't be trusted. It won't work. You can't predict when someone will do something like this. You can never be 'safe' and the sooner you realize it, the happier you will be. What's truly sad is that some of these same people thump the Constitution in one hand while advocating we strip a certain group of it's civil rights with the other.

I will never understand this line of reasoning that "we're scared". That couldn't be farther from the truth. We're not scared, we're resolved to crush and annihilate anyone that wishes to cause harm to our nation or inflict terror in our citizens or use violence as a means to outwardly influence our politics. Resolve, not fear.

Oh, and Sen. McCain called it "an act of terror" today. Does that suit the apologists?

-edit-
Just reread your post. It's very sickening how you are making excuses and essentially apologizing for this guy. It's almost as if you support what he did or somehow think it's ok or not his fault or not premeditated. You sound like every other muslim if you are one - shifting blame away from your ideology and called upon jihad. STand up and denounce this attack or continue to be lumped in with the lunatics fringe of your religion of "peace".
 
Last edited:

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,128
8,869
136
I will never understand this line of reasoning that "we're scared". That couldn't be farther from the truth. We're not scared, we're resolved to crush and annihilate anyone that wishes to cause harm to our nation or inflict terror in our citizens or use violence as a means to outwardly influence our politics. Resolve, not fear.

Oh, and Sen. McCain called it "an act of terror" today. Does that suit the apologists?

-edit-
Just reread your post. It's very sickening how you are making excuses and essentially apologizing for this guy. It's almost as if you support what he did or somehow think it's ok or not his fault or not premeditated. You sound like every other muslim if you are one - shifting blame away from your ideology and called upon jihad. STand up and denounce this attack or continue to be lumped in with the lunatics fringe of your religion of "peace".

Jesus. Learn to read.
 

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
I will never understand this line of reasoning that "we're scared". That couldn't be farther from the truth. We're not scared, we're resolved to crush and annihilate anyone that wishes to cause harm to our nation or inflict terror in our citizens or use violence as a means to outwardly influence our politics. Resolve, not fear.

Oh, and Sen. McCain called it "an act of terror" today. Does that suit the apologists?

-edit-
Just reread your post. It's very sickening how you are making excuses and essentially apologizing for this guy. It's almost as if you support what he did or somehow think it's ok or not his fault or not premeditated. You sound like every other muslim if you are one - shifting blame away from your ideology and called upon jihad. STand up and denounce this attack or continue to be lumped in with the lunatics fringe of your religion of "peace".

I did not apologize for this guy. I did not condone his behavior at all. I'm simply saying that the world is not the black and white one you paint it as. Do I think that if he had radical religious beliefs it accounts for some of the motivation behind this crime? Yes, I just don't think it accounts for all of it. I'm note even sure yet that it even accounts for most of the motivation. You are ignoring a great deal of salient information because it doesn't fit with your worldview. I'm going into Counseling. I intend to become a Trauma Specialist. There is a whole ton of information that the mainstream media is ignoring with regards to the Hasan's chosen profession that may explain some of the motivation behind this attack. Specifically concepts like secondary trauma and counter-transference.

I could care less what any other person labels this act as. As far as I'm concerned, it was a random, senseless, crime upon U.S. soldiers. I do not think it fits the criteria of organized terrorism, not unless we are broadening that definition a great deal. This doesn't appear to be an attack that was arranged by Al-Qaeda or any other "terrorist" organization, it was simply the act of a madman. That isn't terrorism.

As for your second paragraph, I suggest you spend some time in a reading comprehension class. Your response reeks of paranoia. You are so blinded by your fear you don't even acknowledge it. I'm agnostic. If I was Muslim would it matter? What did I say that was so radical? I did not once condone his actions, I simply offered some additional information about potential motivations.
 
Last edited:

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
...if he is not an Islamist terrorist then how do you explain this:
Correlation does not imply causation.

Again, did terrorists actually have an operative in the military, they would have made far more use of him than having him do what any nutcase kid can.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,365
50,340
136
I know falsers such as yourself like to claim that, but highly doubt the claim has any basis in reality.

Well by all means prove me wrong. Feel free to link me a single structural engineering department of any university or any major structural engineering group that supports your ideas (or really any similar purposeful demolition) theory for 9/11.

Since my claim has no basis in reality, one should be easy to find.
 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
It's your claim, and you just proved it wrongheaded yourself by admitting it is based on imagining that a bunch of people who never necessarily looked at the evidence support the official myth of how the buildings came down.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,365
50,340
136
It's your claim, and you just proved it wrongheaded yourself by admitting it is based on imagining that a bunch of people who never necessarily looked at the evidence support the official myth of how the buildings came down.

Wait... what? I think we might be getting to the root of why you're a truther, and it could very well be because you lack basic reading comprehension skills as well as an understanding of logical conjecture. My statement did absolutely nothing to 'admit' it was based on imagining people who never looked at the evidence thought something or anything even remotely resembling that.

There are a number of authoritative sources that have declared that the buildings' destruction was due to the jet impact and ensuing fire. Nowhere in my statement did I use or attempt to use the conjecture of people who have 'never necessarily looked at the evidence', my point of view is already supported by such groups. What I am saying is that many many people HAVE looked at the evidence, and if it is as compelling as you claim it to be, at least one reputable structural engineering entity should have endorsed your view.

Why don't you go find one.
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
You want to give a true definition of "terrorist attack"? Kinda hard to debate anything when you don't even know what you are discussing.

Still waiting on our resident terrorist expert spidey07 to answer this question. It's an easy question for someone who knows so much about this type of thing.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Muslim leaders do not lead radical Muslims. I'm glad we are not in a rush to label him a terrorist, because that is a really convenient way for an administration to strip someone of all their rights. I'm sorry, but my definition of terrorism does not include random acts of violence. The "threshold" is a little higher in my book.

A little video I uploaded for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaWmumbsCvg

We're ignoring the fact that this guy was a trauma specialist. No one is talking about counter-transference, secondary trauma, or suicide by police. People are outright dismissing other relevant facts, like how he was obviously ostracized by a fellow soldier. We are acting like it's a radical concept that someone would believe the Laws of God trump the Laws of Man, or that it's a radical idea that someone would struggle with the idea of killing someone else like themselves because they took an oath. We are only looking for stuff that supports our preconceived notions of why this crime was committed based on his last name.

We've already decided what the cause of this attack was, and god damn it, all the other facts don't matter. Anyone who disagrees is a liberal politically correct anti-American fool. It's fucking pathetic and displays a level of ignorance that is truly revolting. However, that isn't the worst part. The most revolting thing about this entire episode is that it will lead to even more ostracizing of Muslim Americans, which will probably lead to even more violence.

To me this is more demonstration that the 9/11 attacks were successful. Americans are scared. We are now confusing actual terrorism with random acts of violence. People are looking for patterns, in hopes that they can predict when this will happen again and they can be safe. Many Americans simply cannot accept the fact that this was a random and senseless act of violence against our troops. They need something more firm to cling to, and if this thread is any evidence, a lot of people are clinging to the idea that Muslims can't be trusted. It won't work. You can't predict when someone will do something like this. You can never be 'safe' and the sooner you realize it, the happier you will be. What's truly sad is that some of these same people thump the Constitution in one hand while advocating we strip a certain group of it's civil rights with the other. That scares me a whole hell of a lot more than anything this guy did.

When one yells "Allahu akbar" while shooting forty-one fellow soldiers because he was "ostracised" by another soldier, that's the Law of Allah, not the Law of G-d. Christian soldiers may not have liked fighting Christian Serbs to allow Muslim Albanians to take over their country, but exactly zero shot dozens of their fellow soldiers and dependents thinking it would please G-d. For that matter, exactly zero shot dozens of Muslims thinking it would please G-d.

This was senseless, yes, but hardly random. He hated the War on Terror because he was a Muslim and the terrorists were Muslim, he didn't want to participate in it because he was a Muslim, and he killed as many infidels as possible to avoid participating in it. There is little about this that was random. It is the same thing that radical Islamic leaders everywhere preach that good Muslims should do, and unfortunately instead of standing up to radical elements within Islam, non-radical Muslims immediately begin explaining why it isn't terrorism and making excuses for it.

The idea that this could not have been predicted - and stopped - is just insane. Surely you've read some of his lecture? The man was foaming street rat crazy with hatred toward the United States, he was attempting to contact al Qaeda, he was contacting Muslims clerics encouraging all Muslims to rise up against the United States - if this was random then so was 9/11, nothing to do with radical Islam and its hate for the West and America, just a bunch of young men who just happened to like cutting women's throats and flying jet liners into buildings. Sort of a social club.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,128
8,869
136
Well, no need for an investigation now. Someone's second account ^ has already cracked the case.
 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Nowhere in my statement did I use or attempt to use the conjecture of people who have 'never necessarily looked at the evidence'...
You claimed "the vast majority of all structural engineers", but when asked how you substantiate your claim, you simply cite the lack of "a single structural engineering department of any university or any major structural engineering group" acknowledging the fact that the buildings were rigged to come down. So, you can't even show a simple majority, let alone a vast one, even took a serious look at the evidence, yet you play make-believe in claiming otherwise as an excuse to avoid doing so yourself.

Seriously, here is a list of architects and engineers who have come to terms with the fact that the official story is flagrantly false, I highly doubt you can product list of credentialed people anywhere that long who will sign their name to the contrary. Put simply, you've got little more than smoke and mirrors.
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
We sure as hell are calling it a terrorist attack on American soil regardless of what talking heads say. Call a spade a spade and screw political correctness - muslim terrorist carrying out jihad. Have a quick military trial and send him to the firing squad.

Remember the oath to The Constitution - "protect from enemies both foreign AND domestic"

Then why haven't you been shot yet? You and your kind are doing far more damage to this country than Hasan ever could. You're making it's citizens little robot pussies who cower in their homes, stroking their guns, listening to sociopathic corporate prostitutes tell them they should be worried about when the brown people are going to get them.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Then why haven't you been shot yet? You and your kind are doing far more damage to this country than Hasan ever could. You're making it's citizens little robot pussies who cower in their homes, stroking their guns, listening to sociopathic corporate prostitutes tell them they should be worried about when the brown people are going to get them.

LOL! I've already explained it has nothing to do with being scared, more about destroying our enemies.
 

ss284

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,534
0
0
Seriously, here is a list of architects and engineers who have come to terms with the fact that the official story is flagrantly false, I highly doubt you can product list of credentialed people anywhere that long who will sign their name to the contrary. Put simply, you've got little more than smoke and mirrors.

Why would he need to produce a petition, if its the accepted theory? By definition your truther petition is a list of engineers that disagree with this accepted and proven theory. This list of "credentialed internet engineers" is so small in comparison to the number of real architects and engineers that exist, that all it proves is that there are more people like you in our country that cant understand basic logic, science, and math.

Its really depressing actually .
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Then why haven't you been shot yet? You and your kind are doing far more damage to this country than Hasan ever could. You're making it's citizens little robot pussies who cower in their homes, stroking their guns, listening to sociopathic corporate prostitutes tell them they should be worried about when the brown people are going to get them.

actually you are. the silly pussy notions of yours that have cut off the balls of authority. authorities were petrified of doing anything to this piece of shit for the fear of getting crucified as racist. its just that simple. there is mountains of evidence about the extreme Islamic views this piece of shit has and nobody had the BALLS to throw his ass out of the military.

also WTF is wrong with the Army for allowing a nutcase shrink treat soldiers for their problems???? no wonder our troops aren't getting the help they need.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |