zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,819
- 29,570
- 146
completions, attempts, total yards, yards per catch, touchdowns?
yep, I deleted the rest. It looked fine before I hit post!
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/den/denver-broncos
completions, attempts, total yards, yards per catch, touchdowns?
yep, I deleted the rest. It looked fine before I hit post!
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/den/denver-broncos
Happens to me every week when I make this thread. Have to copy to notepad first, fix the formatting, copy and past into the thread and fix the formatting again. I think they do that on purpose so no crawlers can mine the data easily.
Just can't wait for that very quickly approaching time when both brady and can'tplayincoldmanning are out of the game and they leave a couple bandwagons full of sobbing schmucks.
I heard they caught Tampa Bay's AIDS and died?
They'll hop on a new one soon enough. Dallas went through this after the Triplets and Dynasty era. All the bandwagoners hopped onto Houston the second they started having some decent seasons. And, watching how quickly they're falling off now is rather humorous. For the past few years, they've been nothing but trash talking the Cowboys and now they are silent as the dead.
I'll never understand how people can change the team they're rooting for. Short of a permanent move it just seems wrong. Hell I moved to this area three years ago and still don't give much of a shit about Indy or Chicago. It just feels like cheating to root for anybody other than what I grew up watching. I guess that's what makes bandwagoners so despicable.
Here we have it folks, a tiered bandwagon approach. :awe:I do tend to pull for the local team(s), assuming they aren't mortal enemies. Only because it's more fun to have a local team winning, or even to share in their misery.
I still keep primary allegiances, but I have had no shame in pulling for the Cubs/A's (Mets), the Chargers/Bears/Niners/Seattle (Redskins) because there are no real conflicts.
Especially with football, I tend to pick "new teams" based on players.
Here we have it folks, a tiered bandwagon approach. :awe:
I'm the same way, I have "my team" but there's a few others I enjoy watching and sometimes a team will change from year to year in that secondary list.
Impressive effort by Cutler so far. The 2nd quarter isn't even over and he's already thrown more picks than McCown did in six games.
Weird in Seattle game, WR basically pushed out of bounds so now he can't come back in and be an eligible receiver? I didn't know that was the case
Not that anyone cares, but here's why from mike pereria
"Regarding your tweets, it makes no difference if Tate was pushed out there. The QB was out of the pocket - WR can legally be pushed OOB"
Vikes doing their darnedest to give NFC east to the girls.