- Nov 8, 2012
- 20,842
- 4,785
- 146
Didn't really see a dedicated thread on this - yet this was a major recent decision that will inevitably spark this week's protests.
Attorney general ended up only charging one of the officers - and it wasn't for murder but more along the lines of recklessly shooting.
Personally I think there's some problems on all fronts. Irrational frothing at the mouth lefties won't settle for anything other than 1st Degree murder charges for each officer.
Righties will probably say the officers are entirely innocent.
Reality is somewhere inbetween. If officers are being shot at - you can expect fire to be returned. Goodluck getting a murder charge. Are you expecting them to cower in fear and run away when shots were fired?
But what pisses me the fuck off about this whole thing is the part that NO ONE cares to discuss.... Who is ultimately liable for this? The answer is REALLY fucking simple. The person most liable for this is the judge that approved a warrant. Period. End of story. They are the cause of this. They are supposed to be the checks and balance. They weren't and they never are.
2nd person that is liable should be the officers, investigators, etc... whomever presented the (obvious false) evidence to the judge.
Those are the parties responsible for these events the most. But for some blissful reason we just ignore that and just directly point the finger at the officers that were tasked with performing the warrant. They conduct the warrant - and they get shot at. They respond with shots.
Doing things like raiding a home with guns drawn should require SUBSTANTIAL evidence to approve. I'm talking documented videos and photos of people hauling in bricks of cocaine/heroin or something to that scale. They make it sound like there was a meth lab going on - but the reality was obviously otherwise.
Attorney general ended up only charging one of the officers - and it wasn't for murder but more along the lines of recklessly shooting.
Breonna Taylor: Police officer charged but not over death
Brett Hankison fired 10 rounds into her apartment and is accused of endangering her neighbours.
www.bbc.com
Brett Hankison has been charged, not with Ms Taylor's death, but with "wanton endangerment" for firing into a neighbour's apartment in Louisville.
Two other officers who were involved have not been charged.
Personally I think there's some problems on all fronts. Irrational frothing at the mouth lefties won't settle for anything other than 1st Degree murder charges for each officer.
Righties will probably say the officers are entirely innocent.
Reality is somewhere inbetween. If officers are being shot at - you can expect fire to be returned. Goodluck getting a murder charge. Are you expecting them to cower in fear and run away when shots were fired?
But what pisses me the fuck off about this whole thing is the part that NO ONE cares to discuss.... Who is ultimately liable for this? The answer is REALLY fucking simple. The person most liable for this is the judge that approved a warrant. Period. End of story. They are the cause of this. They are supposed to be the checks and balance. They weren't and they never are.
2nd person that is liable should be the officers, investigators, etc... whomever presented the (obvious false) evidence to the judge.
Those are the parties responsible for these events the most. But for some blissful reason we just ignore that and just directly point the finger at the officers that were tasked with performing the warrant. They conduct the warrant - and they get shot at. They respond with shots.
Doing things like raiding a home with guns drawn should require SUBSTANTIAL evidence to approve. I'm talking documented videos and photos of people hauling in bricks of cocaine/heroin or something to that scale. They make it sound like there was a meth lab going on - but the reality was obviously otherwise.