- Jun 15, 2013
- 1
- 0
- 0
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/16xkb
Hows the build? Any tips or modifications ? Would like to stay under 600, preferable 580>
Hows the build? Any tips or modifications ? Would like to stay under 600, preferable 580>
I wouldn't get that AMD FX chip. An i3 3220 would be a better choice for gaming, IMO.
Erm, no.
Stick with the AMD part, it's the best value in that range.
Erm, no.
Stick with the AMD part, it's the best value in that range.
The i3 holds up well against those high power consumption FX chips...
Just let me get my 200 Hz monitor out.
It's an amazing argument... That nobody cares about in targeted user group (like you said). Still it's reoccurring so often that it's getting silly.Oh yes, because that is what everyone cares about in a gaming desktop PC.
It's an amazing argument... That nobody cares about in targeted user group (like you said). Still it's reoccurring so often that it's getting silly.
People who recommend i3 should buy and actually use it themselves to game on. With pictures/videos as proof etc.
That being said, I'd still recommend an FX6300/6350 for a slightly more future-proof gaming rig, but don't dismiss the i3 entirely for a budget rig. If I were building a system for a mix of productivity, gaming, and office use, I'd get the i3.
Actually, the i3 is very competitive with the FX6350 in a lot of games (the ones above are cherry-picked). My own testing has shown that in many games, it can actually keep pace with an i7: http://www.techbuyersguru.com/CPUgaming.php
That being said, I'd still recommend an FX6300/6350 for a slightly more future-proof gaming rig, but don't dismiss the i3 entirely for a budget rig. If I were building a system for a mix of productivity, gaming, and office use, I'd get the i3.
How come? I'd have thought that for general purpose productivity and office use, any modern chip would be fine (even a Celeron) if paired with an SSD- and the majority of CPU intensive tasks other than gaming tend to be pretty well multithreaded these days (encoding springs to mind). Given that most modern PCs ship with at least 4 threads, I wouldn't expect many more single-threaded CPU intensive applications to arise. *shrug*
EDIT: Also, nice article! I might have to check out your blog more often.
Thanks!
The reason I'd recommend it for a multi-purpose system is its ultra-low power consumption, much better single-threaded performance, and built-in video.
I'm typing this right now on my i3-3220 test system and it's using 27W at the wall. With a discrete video card it would be closer to 45W, but even so, it's pretty amazing.
People who recommend i3 should buy and actually use it themselves to game on. With pictures/videos as proof etc.