Thank you SCROTUS for giving Americans the right to die en masse in a storm of totally legal and totally cool automatic weapon fire.
Jeez get it right. It's not automatic weapon fire, it's bump stock fire, totally different.Thank you SCROTUS for giving Americans the right to die en masse in a storm of totally legal and totally cool automatic weapon fire.
Gosh, you're dumb.This ruling is very surprising. For years I've been reading that this Supreme Court was put in place to do Trumps bidding. This ban was put in place by the Trump admin with his approval. If the above is true why would they go against him?
I'll wait for you TDS suffering phucktards to move the goalposts before you answer. Should be as funny/ sad as usual.
As a second amendment advocate I think Bump Stops should be illegal along with high capacity magazines. Also anything that is intended to get around the automatic weapons (machine gun) being illegal.
But this single issue falls outside everything else his party stands forExcept you keep voting for the exact party that does all these things you are supposedly 'against'
Empty words.
Except you keep voting for the exact party that does all these things you are supposedly 'against'
Empty words.
I'm pretty sure you will be the only person here advocating for the banning of Bump Stops.As a second amendment advocate I think Bump Stops should be illegal along with high capacity magazines. Also anything that is intended to get around the automatic weapons (machine gun) being illegal.
The exception that proves the rule.This ruling is very surprising. For years I've been reading that this Supreme Court was put in place to do Trumps bidding. This ban was put in place by the Trump admin with his approval. If the above is true why would they go against him?
He's not wrong though is he? It's been obvious for years that you claim to believe one thing and then vote for people who don't believe that and enact policies that are the opposite.Blah, Blah, Blah.
I'm pretty sure you will be the only person here advocating for the banning of Bump Stops.
He's not wrong though is he? It's been obvious for you years that you claim to believe one thing and then vote for people who don't believe that and enact policies that are the opposite.
So yeah
As a mechanical engineer you can have my bump stops when you pry them from my crushed suspension.As a second amendment advocate I think Bump Stocks should be illegal along with high capacity magazines. Also anything that is intended to get around the automatic weapons (machine gun) being illegal.
You voted for Nancy Mace in 2022 right?Actually you have no idea who I vote / voted for other than Trump twice and I also voting for Clinton once for President.
Hey and guess what, Trump is the one that banned Bump Stocks. Holy Shit!
The laws definitely need to be refined. Currently they lead to not only the bump stock situation, but effectively make gatling guns legal:I agree with you in principal, but the ruling was based on the language of the statues in place.
It is a technological adaptation to increase due rate, but bumpstocks do not meet the legal definition of machineguns since it's still 1 trigger action/ 1 round fired.
I would think binary triggers also fall into this category.
I do think it's important for the govt to follow the laws as written, so the legal outcome of this may be to revise the statues appropriately.
Put on your thinking cap.Why ban body armor? It's a passive defense.
Remember the north hollywood shootout? The only people who need body armor are LEOs and military. Civilians shouldn't be allowed to own the same equipment as either.Why ban body armor? It's a passive defense.
You voted for Nancy Mace in 2022 right?
She is NRA endorsed. Think she supports banning high capacity mags, bump stocks etc?