Originally posted by: Pennstate
I don't understand the privacy argument. It's not like the names of the deceased were written in big letters on the coffins.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Pennstate
I don't understand the privacy argument. It's not like the names of the deceased were written in big letters on the coffins.
The privacy arguement is that the Bush admin wants to keep these images private to themselves and reduce the US casualties to just a name and rank in an obituary.
Not everyone here gets their talking points from the GOP. Run along now. I got the thread title the same place Bush got his justification for war fromOriginally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Pennstate
I don't understand the privacy argument. It's not like the names of the deceased were written in big letters on the coffins.
The privacy arguement is that the Bush admin wants to keep these images private to themselves and reduce the US casualties to just a name and rank in an obituary.
Did Bush tell you this personally or did you get it from the same place you pulled the thread title from?
NASANOTE TO EDITORS : n04-059
Columbia Crew Mistakenly Identified As Iraqi War Casualties
Many news organizations across the country are mistakenly identifying the flag-draped caskets of the Space Shuttle Columbia's crew as those of war casualties from Iraq.
Editors are being asked to confirm that the images used in news reports are in fact those of American casualties and not those of the NASA astronauts who were killed Feb.1, 2003, in the Columbia tragedy.
An initial review of the images featured on the Internet site www.thememoryhole.org shows that more than 18 rows of images from Dover Air Force Base in Delaware are actually photographs of honors rendered to Columbia's seven astronauts.
News organizations across the world have been publishing and distributing images featured on the web site.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Not everyone here gets their talking points from the GOP. Run along now. I got the thread title the same place Bush got his justification for war fromOriginally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Pennstate
I don't understand the privacy argument. It's not like the names of the deceased were written in big letters on the coffins.
The privacy arguement is that the Bush admin wants to keep these images private to themselves and reduce the US casualties to just a name and rank in an obituary.
Did Bush tell you this personally or did you get it from the same place you pulled the thread title from?
Originally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Not everyone here gets their talking points from the GOP. Run along now. I got the thread title the same place Bush got his justification for war fromOriginally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Pennstate
I don't understand the privacy argument. It's not like the names of the deceased were written in big letters on the coffins.
The privacy arguement is that the Bush admin wants to keep these images private to themselves and reduce the US casualties to just a name and rank in an obituary.
Did Bush tell you this personally or did you get it from the same place you pulled the thread title from?
Tenett?
Originally posted by: KK
Where'd you pull that title and topic summary from? Your ass?
KK
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: KK
Where'd you pull that title and topic summary from? Your ass?
KK
:beer:
CkG
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: KK
Where'd you pull that title and topic summary from? Your ass?
KK
:beer:
CkG
:cookie for a throll, since you didn't contribute anything to the thread.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: KK
Where'd you pull that title and topic summary from? Your ass?
KK
:beer:
CkG
:cookie for a throll, since you didn't contribute anything to the thread.
*cookie* to OP then
CkG
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Doesn't really matter, this is a war, even though it was declared over a long time ago, the flowers turned into bullets and every day someones father, son, brother, sister, mother or daughter die in Iraq, that is only counting those who matters, not the Iraqis, the ones who are supposed to be liberated.
Soon the power will be turned over to the Iraqis, erm, no, not for the security or law enforcement, not for the legal system of course, but the, eh, power.
Thank god the Iraqis are now liberated so they can follow ehhhh, well someone else than Saddam that they don't want to follow.
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Doesn't really matter, this is a war, even though it was declared over a long time ago, the flowers turned into bullets and every day someones father, son, brother, sister, mother or daughter die in Iraq, that is only counting those who matters, not the Iraqis, the ones who are supposed to be liberated.
Soon the power will be turned over to the Iraqis, erm, no, not for the security or law enforcement, not for the legal system of course, but the, eh, power.
Thank god the Iraqis are now liberated so they can follow ehhhh, well someone else than Saddam that they don't want to follow.
Luckily, you have no say in anything that goes on in Iraq. The next time your country gets the balls to get involved in world politics, you can start bashing our foreign policy.
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Doesn't really matter, this is a war, even though it was declared over a long time ago, the flowers turned into bullets and every day someones father, son, brother, sister, mother or daughter die in Iraq, that is only counting those who matters, not the Iraqis, the ones who are supposed to be liberated.
Soon the power will be turned over to the Iraqis, erm, no, not for the security or law enforcement, not for the legal system of course, but the, eh, power.
Thank god the Iraqis are now liberated so they can follow ehhhh, well someone else than Saddam that they don't want to follow.
Luckily, you have no say in anything that goes on in Iraq. The next time your country gets the balls to get involved in world politics, you can start bashing our foreign policy.
I did five years in battle zones as a NATO officer, how about you?
Next time your country decides to start a war based on obvious lies and misinformation, maybe your wife will loose her husband, then she can start praising your foregin policy, until then, keep your mouth shut little one.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/23/bush.caskets/index.html