Bush/John Edward in White house, Will you take it?

[nakedfrog]

Originally posted by: vanln
You are wrong my friend. If I want attach hard on John Kerry. I would say John Kerry is a big lie. It shows on his face very clear. He is a number one gigolo in US. He dumps his girl friend to marry rich women. He attacks on Cheney daughter. That is not a good behavior. His face looks ugly and his wife appearance acting doesn?t look like a high class person. His 20 years record were weak and he flip flop
I didn't mention those. I just attack on John Kerry concept
And I surprise that Liberals have the same behavior like John Kerry. They like attack on personal matter. That is the different between pro Bush and pro Kerry. Pro Bush don?t like dirties games on their own people. Pro Kerry are willing to do all kind of stupid thing

I like a wombat attack on daughter when Bush like dirties with gaming.

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

Originally posted by: nakedfrog

Originally posted by: vanln
You are wrong my friend. If I want attach hard on John Kerry. I would say John Kerry is a big lie. It shows on his face very clear. He is a number one gigolo in US. He dumps his girl friend to marry rich women. He attacks on Cheney daughter. That is not a good behavior. His face looks ugly and his wife appearance acting doesn?t look like a high class person. His 20 years record were weak and he flip flop
I didn't mention those. I just attack on John Kerry concept
And I surprise that Liberals have the same behavior like John Kerry. They like attack on personal matter. That is the different between pro Bush and pro Kerry. Pro Bush don?t like dirties games on their own people. Pro Kerry are willing to do all kind of stupid thing

I like a wombat attack on daughter when Bush like dirties with gaming.

It stupid robot cheating number one driveshaft applies like no Rumsfeld ugly ambulance.

 

[Locke0186]

That's not quite right... Congress IS the Electoral College. You must mean the Supreme Court.

 

[DT4K]

Originally posted by: Todd33
LOL. Is it me, or are the rabid Bush fans just idiots? At least the Liberals in the forums can make arguements, read, write, etc.

Hey now, I didn't call all Kerry supporters idiots just because Todd33 is a complete moron.

And yeah, can we get this guy banned or something? Even doing my best to translate to english, he still doesn't make any sense and sounds like a psycho troll.

 

[Hammer]

there's even more messed up scenarios then bush/edward in the white house.

try this: president edwards

if there is no majority of votes in the house and edwards wins in the senate, and january 20th rolls by, edwards becomes acting president until the house can decide.

oh and also, if there is a tie in the senate for VP, cheney can vote for himself in a tie breaker.

 

[LunarRay]

Vanln,
It seems from what I can gather from your posts in this thread that you support President Bush over Senator Kerry for the next presidential four years because Mr. Bush invaded Iraq in the furtherance of defeating terrorism and Kerry cannot deliver a better economy than Bush to the American People and legal aliens resident in the US. Assuming this to be true, I don't follow how you can take an economic track record produced by the Bush Administration which has failed in just about every aspect and compare it to what Kerry MUST deliver if he is to secure another four years if he wins this time. The terrorism issue continues as strong if not stronger than before. I don't see how invading Iraq did anything to dissuaded any potential terrorist from pushing their agenda. The terrorist is not part of a government body they are every day citizens until they go about their business. I think the Bush Administration had other than terrorism on their mind when they invaded Iraq. I believe this and the rest of the world seems to believe it and for this reason we have put in jeopardy our relationships around the world and created a terrorism monster that no invasion anywhere can squash. It seems to me that a policy that lets them be happy in their little world is the best short term solution and long term maybe we can develop dialog of understand and mutual agreements on many fronts.

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: LunarRay
Vanln,
It seems from what I can gather from your posts in this thread that you support President Bush over Senator Kerry for the next presidential four years because Mr. Bush invaded Iraq in the furtherance of defeating terrorism and Kerry cannot deliver a better economy than Bush to the American People and legal aliens resident in the US. Assuming this to be true, I don't follow how you can take an economic track record produced by the Bush Administration which has failed in just about every aspect and compare it to what Kerry MUST deliver if he is to secure another four years if he wins this time. The terrorism issue continues as strong if not stronger than before. I don't see how invading Iraq did anything to dissuaded any potential terrorist from pushing their agenda. The terrorist is not part of a government body they are every day citizens until they go about their business. I think the Bush Administration had other than terrorism on their mind when they invaded Iraq. I believe this and the rest of the world seems to believe it and for this reason we have put in jeopardy our relationships around the world and created a terrorism monster that no invasion anywhere can squash. It seems to me that a policy that lets them be happy in their little world is the best short term solution and long term maybe we can develop dialog of understand and mutual agreements on many fronts.

Tou are trying to be rational here, LR. Bush's appeal isn't to reasonable people. His appeal is emotional. Generally speaking Bush appeals to people who are afraid and don't care about the morality of anthing they feel needs doing to stop their fear.

 

[SickBeast]

Originally posted by: her209
Well, you have Johns.... then you have a Bush and a Dick....

OMGWTFBBQ :Q

 

[arsbanned]

maweebadoobadeebayaba daba dooo

 

[vanln]

Originally posted by: LunarRay
Vanln,
It seems from what I can gather from your posts in this thread that you support President Bush over Senator Kerry for the next presidential four years because Mr. Bush invaded Iraq in the furtherance of defeating terrorism and Kerry cannot deliver a better economy than Bush to the American People and legal aliens resident in the US. Assuming this to be true, I don't follow how you can take an economic track record produced by the Bush Administration which has failed in just about every aspect and compare it to what Kerry MUST deliver if he is to secure another four years if he wins this time. The terrorism issue continues as strong if not stronger than before. I don't see how invading Iraq did anything to dissuaded any potential terrorist from pushing their agenda. The terrorist is not part of a government body they are every day citizens until they go about their business. I think the Bush Administration had other than terrorism on their mind when they invaded Iraq. I believe this and the rest of the world seems to believe it and for this reason we have put in jeopardy our relationships around the world and created a terrorism monster that no invasion anywhere can squash. It seems to me that a policy that lets them be happy in their little world is the best short term solution and long term maybe we can develop dialog of understand and mutual agreements on many fronts.

For sure Bush and his adm have some secret interest. And they don?t want to go out to say about it. This has a lot thing to do with EU dollars. Think about when European came up with EU dollar. They are in title to combat with US dollar. The structure of EU dollar is wrong that is why we don?t need to make them collapse. We just want make EU dollar survive. EU dollar do have a big associate with oil. And remember oil in Iraq is not our interest. That oil is European interest.
To sub-contract job out of US. We eliminate inventory during this time. We don?t have to suffer with billions dollars of inventory. Think about we have job and hold billions dollar of inventory. Yes we have job and we have inventory. The question is who will pay the merchandise. Who have money to pay it? End up we have more dept.
Now China has the contract. Remember every DVD they make only $1 per DVD system. They hold billions of dollars in inventory. Some thing goes wrong they hold a big dept.
Manufacturing has to open 24 hrs a days, they can not close . Now if we said we don?t have money to buy. Of course we will ask them to low the price . Even they lost money they will sell it for you
End up USA we have less dept than other country. I just tell you the general ideal. That is our top secret . Remember politic is not simple.
The predict out come from Bush in the next 4 years is more than we expect
hehehe
John Kerry is wrong for sure

 

[LunarRay]

Vanln,
The North Sea Oil Field has quite a reserve. All of Europe demands much less oil than we do for an equal population. Russia is Europe too as is the nearer former Soviet bloc nations and there is oil a plenty there. So I don't see oil being a European issue as much as a US issue. It is no big secret that the US needs stability in the Mid East to insure the flow of oil to our shores. With out oil the US would go into the ground economically. We'd spend most of our earnings keeping warm or paying for McDonald's plastic plates and some too for the vehicles... But you're right we can't have the Euro become the denominator of world commodities. If that happened dollar investments would dry up and so too our economy.
Bush know this and Kerry knows this and most anyone who thinks knows this. But no one says this. Kinda interesting if you ask me.
In any event, the terrorist need not fly into NY or elsewhere to damage us. All they need doing to destabilize the US and some European countries as well as the oil rich Arabs is to detonate 'dirty' nuke devices in the oil fields around the Mid East. For a thousand years that oil will be worthless... The terrorist don't care about oil... I think he cares about his version of Islam.

 

[LunarRay]

Moonster,

You are trying to be rational here, LR. Bush's appeal isn't to reasonable people. His appeal is emotional. Generally speaking Bush appeals to people who are afraid and don't care about the morality of anything they feel needs doing to stop their fear.

That sorta suggests Bush's following might oughta take up knitting to ease the stress.. what with all there is to really concern ourselves with the Bush blather seems a bit mild. Even an learning tree chopper knows the tree falls down not up.

 

[PatboyX]

what would my other options be, rather than "taking it?"
or...how would i "flush the johns?"

 

[vanln]

Lunar Ray,
We do know that something go under ground. I would hand the job to the Inventer Bush to do the job rather than John Kerry. So who is better to do job in your opinion?

 

[LunarRay]

Originally posted by: vanln
Lunar Ray,
We do know that something go under ground. I would hand the job to the Inventer Bush to do the job rather than John Kerry. So who is better to do job in your opinion?

I don't know. But I do know that Bush Invaded Iraq using Article 51 of the UN Charter and it was based on lies. Show me a picture taken by our intel vehicles before the invasion of a WMD and its delivery system and some proof that an immanent invasion of US interests was to occur and I might run back and ask for my ballot back..